Rippon said:Once again Lou , you show how little you understand Calvinism . It is much broader in scope than just the 5 points . It is so tedious to have to explain this time and time again .
Thanks. You saved me the trouble.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Rippon said:Once again Lou , you show how little you understand Calvinism . It is much broader in scope than just the 5 points . It is so tedious to have to explain this time and time again .
BrotherJames said:I guess Jesus was lying when he said you must come unto him like a child in order to enter the kingdom of heaven. Or the kids back then were very smart.
BrotherJames said:I guess Jesus was lying when he said you must come unto him like a child in order to enter the kingdom of heaven. Or the kids back then were very smart.
menageriekeeper said:Actually, Isaiah, I think the question has been answered quite well. You just don't like the answer.
MenagerieKeeper said:Let me take a swing at this.
Christ died so that all mankind who believed in Him might be saved.
All mankind was already condemned and there was nothing any of them/us could do about it. (see Jn 3:17)
So, those who died before Christ were saved according to their faith/belief that was looking forward to the time of the Messiah.
So yes, Christ died for all mankind, even those who died in the OT. All mankind, however, will not accept His sacrifice and will therefore die in their sins according to their own unbelief in which they were already condemned.
First off, mankind is destined for hell because of unbelief. There was no one in hell before Christ came that was a believer. Those in hell had already chosen not to believe.
Yeah, this I fear is true for many Calvinists. Calvinism is "easy shorthand" for easy ecclesiology, hold the eschatology, pls.npetreley said:I didn't have any idea what TULIP meant until I came to BB. I was already convinced of election, etc., though. I wouldn't say I'm a true Calvinist, anyway, but I'm comfortable being called that, since it's an easy shorthand.
I think there are a couple of ways that we can both fail..webdog said:I agree that individual beliefs within each can both be wrong...by how can calvinist vs. non calvinist both be wrong, though?They are two absolutes on each side of the spectrum. If both are wrong, nothing is right.
Christ died for ALL sin of ALL people (OT saints included) so that ALL would one day be resurrected to stand before Him (Bema, MK, GWT).Isaiah 40 said:Isaiah40:28 said:Christ died for people who were already condemned to hell due to their sin and unbelief?
What purpose did His death serve those who were already condemned to hell?
I asked this way back at the beginning and have continued to ask it since.
What is the non-Calvinist consensus?
So how have you answered the question of why Jesus died for people who were already in hell?skypair said:Christ died for ALL sin of ALL people (OT saints included) so that ALL would one day be resurrected to stand before Him (Bema, MK, GWT).
Christ did not die for UNBELIEF -- a sin of ommission which ALL know they need to do, Rom 1:19-20. It is possible to omit or commit many things in ignorance but this one is "inexcuseable!"
Consensus opinion? I would hope so.
skypair
Again, where is the reason or purpose for Christ dying for people who in your own words, "had already chosen not to believe"?
Why did He have to die for them then? Their destiny was chosen and unchangeable.
What could His death do for them?
Oh, sorry. Thought I did.Isaiah40:28 said:So how have you answered the question of why Jesus died for people who were already in hell?
How have you answered what His death did for them?
I think you answered the what instead of the why.skypair said:Oh, sorry. Thought I did.
At the GWT, they too will receive sinless bodies. They'll be raised on account of Christ's payment for their sins of commission, too.
And they will be judged like ALL out of the "book of works" -- have their "day in court," so to speak, before Christ, the Judge. I see the "book of works" somewhat ameliorating eternal spiritual suffering if the works were good. But then the "book of life" is opened and only those who had received Christ would be found written there. These will not be found and will experience the 2nd physical death in a real "lake of fire" and exist eternally is a spiritual state of suffering in darkness and alone.
skypair
Well since your eschatological beliefs are worlds away from mine, your explanations will not make any sense with my views.skypair said:Oh, sorry. Thought I did.
At the GWT, they too will receive sinless bodies. They'll be raised on account of Christ's payment for their sins of commission, too.
And they will be judged like ALL out of the "book of works" -- have their "day in court," so to speak, before Christ, the Judge. I see the "book of works" somewhat ameliorating eternal spiritual suffering if the works were good. But then the "book of life" is opened and only those who had received Christ would be found written there. These will not be found and will experience the 2nd physical death in a real "lake of fire" and exist eternally is a spiritual state of suffering in darkness and alone.
skypair
Rippon/npetreley said:Once again Lou , you show how little you understand Calvinism . It is much broader in scope than just the 5 points . It is so tedious to have to explain this time and time again ....Thanks. You saved me the trouble.
Lou Martuneac said:Rippon/npetreley:
The 5 points of Calvinism are the foundation of Reformed theology. Various other issues flow from them, such as: the extra-biblical teaching that regeneration must precede faith; double-predestination, hyper-Calvinism; and the works based interpretation of the Gospel known as: Lordship Salvation.
It is a simple, unambiguous question. Which of the five points of Calvinism do you reject?
Total Inability; Unconditional Election; Limited Atonement; Irresistible Grace; Perseverance of the Saints
Can we start with Calvinism's Limited Atonement? This point very closely identifies with the question of this thread.
Do you believe and agree with Calvinism's Limited Atonement?
I trust that you are not going to dodge this question.
LM
John 3:36
36He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
4 Love suffers long and is kind; love does not envy; love does not parade itself, is not puffed up; 5 does not behave rudely, does not seek its own, is not provoked, thinks no evil; 6 does not rejoice in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth; 7 bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.
8 Love never fails. But whether there are prophecies, they will fail; whether there are tongues, they will cease; whether there is knowledge, it will vanish away.
"For whom the, and scourgeth every son whom He receiveth."Lord loveth He chasteneth