I agree with you on this.Many people talk about some sort of credence or assent that it saves. I think this is error.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I agree with you on this.Many people talk about some sort of credence or assent that it saves. I think this is error.
Obviously, I heartily embrace these words.
However, I think that we need to be careful how we interpret them. The broad scriptural picture that I see suggests that if one is not "on a general upward trajetory" in terms of good works (after entering into faith), then our ultimate fate is bleak.
I suggest that one read these words from 1 John as affirming that "slip-ups" can be remediated. But I doubt that these words mean that "you're saved" no matter what kind of life you live after entering into faith.
I agree with you on this.
Originally Posted by BobRyan
A better question would be -- "What sin does the Bible say you MUST continue to commit as a born-again Christian"?
1Cor 10 and Romans 6 make it clear that the answer is "none".
However Romans 8 DOES bring to view a group that MUST continue to sin --
Rom 8
5 For those who are according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who are according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit.
6 For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace,
7 because the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the Law of God, for it is not even able to do so,
8 and those who are [b]in the flesh cannot please God[/b].
That is not a better question for the answer is as you say "none".
A good question would be why is it everyone born of God does still have failures at keeping God's commandments?
Now I myself find myself failing daily even though I really desire to keep God's commandments.
How about Christians who refuse to repent of breaking the Sabbath commandment? Or is the Sabbath commandment one of those commandments not in force for the believer in Christ?
:godisgood:
Yes that is true.Christianity is about knowing a person.
Steaver;
Now I myself find myself failing daily even though I really desire to keep God's commandments.
That is exactly the problem Paul admitted to having in Romans 7 before he applied the Romans 8 solution - which released him from slavery to sinning - as Romans 6 demands.
in Christ,
Bob
James 4:17 "to the one that knows to do right - and does it not - to him it is sin"
John 16 the "Spirit (of truth) convicts the WORLD of sin and righteousness and judgment".
As Christ said also in John 16 "I have many more things to teach you but you cannot bear them now"
Many people read various parts of the Bible and then decide for whatever reason "that does not mean me".
The disciples did it when it came to loving their neighbor in Lev 19:18 vs loving the Samaritans.
But in the end - God addresses those issues with each one of us via His Holy Spirit - "convicting the WORLD of sin and righteousness and judgment".
Catholics who persecuted protestants would often claim they felt "blessed by God" for doing so.
in John 16 Christ ALSO said that people would persecute the saints "thinking they do God a service". Saul did that - before becoming Paul.
in Christ,
Bob
Are you saying that one is not held accountable for merely knowing what the Law says, but one must also have had the Spirit convict them that "shall" or "shall not" really means "shall" or "shall not"?
Example;
Are you saying one could read "thou shall not kill" and the Spirit NOT convict them that this is a commandment that God holds them accountable to keep?
:jesus:
Did Jesus rationalize.My previous post addressed that - but upon reflection...
I am amazed that you would ask that question.
You seem to be saying that it is not possible that someone could read one of the Ten Commadments and then come up with some attractive rationale as to why they did not have to be in obedience to what they were reading.
I find it hard to believe that you of all people cannot imagine how such a thing might happen.
in Christ,
Bob
Steaver: Would like to take this survey to see how many here have been able to keep God's commandments without any failures whatsoever since their rebirth.
As the Catholics read the commandment against the worship of images and then suppose that because their images are not gods - but merely represent the one true God -- they are not in violation of the very commandment they are reading.
As the Catholics read the Isaiah 8:19-20 command against praying to the dead and against man-made tradition that is not judged "sola scriptura" - and yet suppose reasons to themselves as to why their own practice might not be a violation of that scripture.
I meantion Catholics only because it is often easier to see the problem clearly when "other people" are having the problem rather when you are having it.
James 4:17 "To him that knows to do right - and does it not - to him it is sin"
The Holy Spirit's job is to "convict the WORLD of sin and righteousness and judgment"
It is our job to go and share the good news of the Gospel as found in the Word of God -- teaching them ALL the Word of God. But it is not man that convicts man of sin -- it is the Holy Spirit.
I have shown you D.L Moody's sermon on the Sabbath commandment - right?
And I recently posted a link to an old 2008 World Net Daily news article researching that subject -
http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1518461&postcount=65
Paul argues that as the chief of sinners he used to work for the goal of killing the saints. But in Phil 3 he declares that at that time he thought of himself as "blameless" before God.
in Christ,
Bob
Are you saying that one is not held accountable for merely knowing what the Law says, but one must also have had the Spirit convict them that "shall" or "shall not" really means "shall" or "shall not"?
Example;
Are you saying one could read "thou shall not kill" and the Spirit NOT convict them that this is a commandment that God holds them accountable to keep?
Paul argues that as the chief of sinners he used to work for the goal of killing the saints. But in Phil 3 he declares that at that time he thought of himself as "blameless" before God.
Did Jesus rationalize.
Thou shalt not kill. One of the Ten Commandments.
HP: What is so absurd is that such a survey proves absolutely nothing. Neither would the following surveys prove anything: A survey on whether or not anyone has not sinned, or if anyone did not sin for a day, month or year subsequent to salvation.
If there was a mountain no one had climbed before, does that make it a natural impossibility to climb? If no has ever landed on Mars, does it make it a natural impossibility for one to land there?
Here are two great verses for us to consider:
Heb 6:1 ¶ Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God,
Php 3:13 Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but this one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before,
14 I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.
15 ¶ Let us therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus minded: and if in any thing ye be otherwise minded, God shall reveal even this unto you.
Php 3:13 Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but this one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before,
14 I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.
15 ¶ Let us therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus minded: and if in any thing ye be otherwise minded, God shall reveal even this unto you.