Nothing gets settled in one liners.
...and few read your essays. Short, brief, and to the point, folks will read.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Nothing gets settled in one liners.
For the elect, yes. Not for the ones who did not have their sins paid for, the non-elect.
Logic requires you prove a universal claim. You claim that Jesus has drawn and does draw 100% of all humanity to himself. Your task is to prove that 100% of all humanity is drawn. Tell me about that tribe on an island off the India coast where no Christian has survived. Did Jesus draw all these folks to himself?Ooooppps, where are you getting the non-elect? Your theology requires you to make up some new doctrines.It is reasonable to believe the words and to follow the logic of the scriptures.
Jesus said, "If I be lifted up I will draw all men unto me." Then after he was lifted up and resurrected he said "Go into the world and preach the gospel to every creature." Is every creature the same as all?
Previously and before he was lifted up he said the following to the same men;
5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:
6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Logic would have us to reasonably conclude that before he was lifted up he was not drawing all men unto himself. No?
Logic requires you prove a universal claim. You claim that Jesus has drawn and does draw 100% of all humanity to himself. Your task is to prove that 100% of all humanity is drawn. Tell me about that tribe on an island off the India coast where no Christian has survived. Did Jesus draw all these folks to himself?
You want to go with logic? Prove your universal assertion or admit you misspoke.
Um, if some are elect, that necessitates the rest be non-elect.Are you preaching the non doctrine of the non elect as well?
See, you did not answer a single question I asked but went into a hysterical rant asking me to prove what I did not say. Ask me a question based on what I said and not what you misinterpreted my words to say and I will give you an answer.
You have demonstrated the prevailing MO of the Reformed in your post.
So...logic isn't your strong suit.Are you preaching the non doctrine of the non elect as well?
See, you did not answer a single question I asked but went into a hysterical rant asking me to prove what I did not say. Ask me a question based on what I said and not what you misinterpreted my words to say and I will give you an answer.
You have demonstrated the prevailing MO of the Reformed in your post.
That's Gods business, none of mine, the question is what if?... He could have saved everyone?... Why didn't he?... What is amazing is that he saved anyone?... All deserved his WRATH, NONE deserved his love... ... We LOVE him because he first LOVED us!... Quit putting the cart before the horse... Brother Glen
Romans 9:24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?
25 As he saith also in Osee, I will call them my people, which were not my people; and her beloved, which was not beloved.
26 And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God
What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction
God was long-suffering for the sake of the wheat, not the tares.
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some count slackness; but is longsuffering to you-ward, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. 2 Pet 3:9
Peter was the apostle to the Jews and the 'longsuffering to you-ward' is the forty years God gave the Jews to repent and avoid 'the wrath to come' upon that generation and bringing the curses/plagues of Lev 26/Dt 28 down upon their progeny. 'I gave her time that she should repent; and she willeth not to repent' Re 2:21.
'Not wishing that any should perish' is in the same vein as Acts 2:40:
And with many other words he testified, and exhorted them, saying, Save yourselves from this crooked generation.
Or Acts 3:23:
And it shall be, that every soul that shall not hearken to that prophet, shall be utterly destroyed from among the people.
Or Rev 18:4:
Come forth, my people, out of her, that ye have no fellowship with her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues:
WHY would God even bother with those who are "vessels of destruction", as they are already hell-bound,
Why would God be LONGSUFFERING towards these?
Right. God 'endured' the evil for the sake of the good:
22 What if God, willing to show his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering vessels of wrath fitted unto destruction:
23 and that he might make known the riches of his glory upon vessels of mercy, which he afore prepared unto glory, Ro 9
Are you intentionally twisting the scriptures? Does the Calvinist Derangement Syndrome that you suffer from drive you to do this? In no way does the passage indicate His longsuffering was 'towards' the vessels of wrath. God 'endured' the vessels of wrath while He 'patiently' waited for the vessels of mercy that He had prepared afore for glory.
I see your normal twisted Calvinist theology which is not what the Bible actually says
I see your Calvinist Derangement Syndrome is still hindering you.
A perfect example of accusing God through a question and then coming to a false conclusion.WHY would God even bother with those who are "vessels of destruction", as they are already hell-bound, which must mean according to Reformed theology, that they are non-elect? Why would God be LONGSUFFERING towards these? The only reason is that He desires their salvation, which is what 2 Peter 3:9 says.
All men means all His Sheep from amongst jew and gentile. And to draw means to regenerate, give them new life and faith.First, please pardon this wrong of mine -- ceasing concerning the pronoun for God to capitalize the first letter -- as almost no Bible, neither old nor new, capitalizes the first letter.
The Bible states plainly that after his ascension, the Lord Jesus Christ would draw to himself all men. (John 12:32 KJV)
By this it is evident that TULIP is faulty, for if all men are drawn to Christ at this time, then the Holy Ghost is moving on all. And wherefore moves he upon all people, if there are some who are chosen by him who alone receive their souls' regeneration?
What is God doing with the unregenerate who were never chosen for Heaven, but pretending to move upon their hearts, if the blood of Christ is insufficient for atoning for the sins of all people. What is the purpose of common grace, but the condemnation of souls who are hated by God, whom he loves in pretense?
When I say God hates, I don't mean the true God; I mean the false God of Calvinism.
I agree with the first sentence.All men means all His Sheep from amongst jew and gentile. And to draw means to regenerate, give them new life and faith.
All men means all His Sheep from amongst jew and gentile. And to draw means to regenerate, give them new life and faith.
So...logic isn't your strong suit.
universal statement – Essential Thinking for Philosophy
It's funny that you think my expectation that you prove your universal statement somehow becomes me being hysterical.
I understand, you cannot prove a universal "all" statement, therefore, logically, you are wrong.