Sorry, but you are a fool.
??? I was actually defending your point Alan. Who's the fool here?
Go back and peruse the post.
Perhaps I constructed it wrong and you missed that the post is addressed to Silverhair.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Sorry, but you are a fool.
So, you're making a stink over this:
Remember Pharoah? God hardened his heart, made him INABLE to comply to Moses' demand, and smote him and his people for not complying. You must not know your Bible very well because this is par for course.
17 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, For this very purpose did I raise thee up, that I might show in thee my power, and that my name might be published abroad in all the earth.
18 So then he hath mercy on whom he will, and whom he will be hardeneth.
19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he still find fault? For who withstandeth his will?
20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why didst thou make me thus? Ro 9
You just can't accept God's Sovereignty, thus your continual railing against Him.
what does that have to do with spiritual inability that God causes, nothing.
KY you must not know your bible very well as Pharaoh hardened his own heart several times before God hardened it. But what does that have to do with spiritual inability that God causes, nothing.
The verses you quote do not support what you think they do. But that is understandable as you only see the bible through your calvinist glasses.
Pharaoh hardened his own heart and God just strengthened Pharaoh resolve in how he would deal with the Jews that he considered his to do with as he pleased.
Pharaoh and Israel
Pharaoh's refusal to be sensitive to the situation or to the pleas of the Hebrew people is spoken of as a heaviness or hardening of the heart
kâbêd H3513
Generally speaking, expressing slowness, dullness or implacability and is found most often in relation to Pharaoh. Kabed usually carries a negative connotation.
châzaq H2388
The basic meaning of this word in the Qal stem is "be(come) strong."
Often in relation to Pharaoh it means to strengthen, harden, be firm, grow firm, be resolute
In general, the Piel is causative of the Qal, "make strong," "strengthen."
Piel usually expresses an "intensive" or "intentional" action.
The Hiphil is "take hold of," "seize,"
Exo_1:11-22 Pharaoh Oppresses Israel
Exo_3:20 I [God] will stretch out My hand and strike Egypt
Exo_7:13 Pharaoh's heart grew hard H2388 (H8799)
Qal [to grow stout, grow rigid, grow hard (bad sense)] BDB
Exo_7:14 Pharaoh’s heart is hard H3515
[hard, difficult, burdensome] BDB
Exo_7:22 and Pharaoh's heart grew hard H2388 (H8799)
Qal [to grow stout, grow rigid, grow hard (bad sense)] BDB {1 Plague blood}
Exo_8:15 he {Pharaoh} hardened H3513 (H8687) his heart
Hiphil [to make heavy, make dull, make unresponsive] BDB {2 Plague frogs}
Exo_8:19 Pharaoh’s grew hard H2388 (H8799), and he did not heed
Qal [to grow stout, grow rigid, grow hard (bad sense)] BDB {3 Plague lice}
Exo_8:32 But Pharaoh hardened H3513 (H8686) his heart
Hiphil [to make heavy, make dull, make unresponsive ] BDB {4 Plague flies}
Exo_9:7 But the heart of Pharaoh became hard H3513 (H8799)
Qal [to be heavy] BDB {5 Plague livestock}
Exo_9:12 But the LORD hardened H2388 (H8762) the heart
Piel [to make rigid, make hard] BDB {6 Plague boils}
Exo_9:34 and he {Pharaoh} hardened H3513 (H8686) his heart
Hiphil [to make heavy, make dull, make unresponsive] BDB {7 Plague hail}
Exo_10:20 But the LORD hardened H2388 (H8762) Pharaoh’s heart
Piel [to make rigid, make hard] BDB {8 Plague locusts}
Exo_10:27 But the LORD hardened H2388 (H8762) Pharaoh’s heart
Piel [to make rigid, make hard] BDB {9 Plague darkness}
Exo_10:1 for I have hardened H3513 (H8689) his heart
Hiphil [to make heavy, make dull, make unresponsive ] BDB
Exo_11:4-5 all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die
{final Plague all firstborn of egypt die}
Exo_11:10 and the LORD hardened H2388 (H8762) Pharaoh’s heart
Piel [to make rigid, make hard] BDB
Exo_14:4 Then I will harden H2388 (H8765) Pharaoh’s heart
Piel [to make rigid, make hard] BDB
Exo_14:8 And the LORD hardened H2388 (H8762) the heart of Pharaoh
Piel [to make rigid, make hard] BDB
Exo_14:17 And I indeed will harden H2388 (H8764) the hearts of the Egyptians
Piel [to make rigid, make hard] BDB
I understand and accept the Sovereignty of God it is the Calvinist definition of God's sovereignty and your abuse of scripture that I rail against.
...and all you've done here is shallowly pitted scripture against scripture.
Not true.The truth of the bible is obviously something that you do not recognize or accept.
Not true.You need your calvinism to support your errant views.
Not trueSo trust your calvinism I will trust scripture.
Not trueBut since you can not contribute much to this debate I will bid you adieu.
This has always bothered me. Clark Pinnock, who was a founding member of the Evangelical Theological Society, ended up in Open Theism, then one who believed in Annihilationism.
In the book on Open Theism, he said that he could not believe in A God who would condemn people who had never heard the name of Jesus.
I know Jesus said he was the Way. But will there be grace for those who never heard?
Not true.
Not true.
Not true
Not true
Wow! You packed a whole bunch of untruths into your post. You lose all credibility when you try to be a prophet and fail miserably at it.
I truly hope you will bid us adieu and leave.
Not true.
Not true.
Not true
Not true
Wow! You packed a whole bunch of untruths into your post. You lose all credibility when you try to be a prophet and fail miserably at it.
I truly hope you will bid us adieu and leave.
...and all you've done here is shallowly pitted scripture against scripture.
To use your phrase, are you so dense? God hardening Pharaoh's heart by strengthening his resolve is not "spiritual inability". You're grasping at straws KY.
Whether or not anyone hears and believes the Gospel, or any of the rest of the word of God, no one is without excuse when it comes to repentance.Therefore then somewhere hidden in V's 19,20 is the gospel whereby I could be saved and of which I heard a little before 1900 years ago. I'll buy that.
Not grasping, at all. I agree with Paul's conclusion from the example of Pharoah, "he hath mercy on whom he will, and whom he will be hardeneth". You're the one that's INABLE to accept it.
17 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, For this very purpose did I raise thee up, that I might show in thee my power, and that my name might be published abroad in all the earth.
18 So then he hath mercy on whom he will, and whom he will be hardeneth.
19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he still find fault? For who withstandeth his will?
20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why didst thou make me thus? Ro 9
God hardened Pharaoh's heart He did not make it spiritually impossible for Pharaoh to allow the Jews to go.
That is just you reading into scripture what is not there.
You're splitting hairs, straining out gnats, making a distinction without a difference. It was impossible for Pharoah to allow the Hebrews to go without God allowing it.
This is just you demonstrating your INABILITY to accept it; "he hath mercy on whom he will, and whom he will be hardeneth".
Silverhair, you post scripture and fail to realize that the scripture you post supports God's sovereign rule over humanity. There is no need to refute the scripture you use because it proves my point. You simply cannot imagine that those verses refute you.@taisto your response does not surprise me. But what does surprise me is that when I post clear scripture in support of my comments I get attacked by so many calvinists. The responses do not use scripture but rather focus on ad hominem's. Why is that? I must be touching a nerve.
You don't have to make the claim. When you tell me who I am and what I believe without any knowledge of me, you are attempting to play the role of prophet. I suggest you stop doing such a foolish thing.Have I ever claimed to be a prophet, NO.
You don't have a mirror, Silverhair. You have a prejudice that taints your sight.And yes I am sure you would like me to stop posting as it seems many on here do not like to have the mirror held up to them.
No you don't.As I said I just point out the logical errors and misuse of scripture that I see.
I study the Bible everyday. My understanding of scripture is always questioned since I am not God.Now if that upsets you or others then perhaps you should question your understanding of scripture.
You seem not to hear me when I tell you that I have never read anything John Calvin ever wrote. It would be impossible for me to create a philosophy from something I have never read. We read scripture. You read it and interpret it differently than I do. That's the point of disagreement. But, you won't look there because you cannot defend your interpretation of Bible passagesI have stated a number of times that calvinists should look at the foundation of their calvinist philosophy and as of this time I doubt that any have done so.
Quote the statements of John Calvin that you disagree with that you think are his foundation for his philosophy. Tell us why you hate John Calvin. Start a new thread in the Calvin forum and title it: "Why I, Silverhair, Hate John Calvin." Quote statements from Calvin that you think are the foundation of his philosophy. Since I haven't read anything about Calvin, I can read your claims and then see if others who have read Calvin will agree with you.If what I have said about the foundations is wrong then show me where. The history is easy enough to find if you want to know the truth.
Silverhair, you post scripture and fail to realize that the scripture you post supports God's sovereign rule over humanity. There is no need to refute the scripture you use because it proves my point. You simply cannot imagine that those verses refute you.
You don't have to make the claim. When you tell me who I am and what I believe without any knowledge of me, you are attempting to play the role of prophet. I suggest you stop doing such a foolish thing.
You don't have a mirror, Silverhair. You have a prejudice that taints your sight.
No you don't.
You accuse people of being evil "calvinists" whenever your humanist worldview is threatened.
I study the Bible everyday. My understanding of scripture is always questioned since I am not God.
What bothers me is your attempt to accuse and condemn Christians who don't hold to your humanist view of God.
You seem not to hear me when I tell you that I have never read anything John Calvin ever wrote. It would be impossible for me to create a philosophy from something I have never read. We read scripture. You read it and interpret it differently than I do. That's the point of disagreement. But, you won't look there because you cannot defend your interpretation of Bible passages
Quote the statements of John Calvin that you disagree with that you think are his foundation for his philosophy. Tell us why you hate John Calvin. Start a new thread in the Calvin forum and title it: "Why I, Silverhair, Hate John Calvin." Quote statements from Calvin that you think are the foundation of his philosophy. Since I haven't read anything about Calvin, I can read your claims and then see if others who have read Calvin will agree with you.
Silverhair, this topic has nothing to do with what you have been railing about.
Does God condemn people if they have never heard the gospel. The answer is, yes, God does condemn people. He condemns them because they have rebelled and sinned against God, whether they knew it or not.
There is nothing wrong in the scripture you post.All you have done in this post is say I know nothing of scripture and yet you do not show where what I have posted is wrong.
Here's your fallacy. I agree with the clarity of scripture that you post. The scripture proves my point. The scripture you post proves you wrong, yet you cannot imagine that to be true.So if you disagree with the clear scripture that I post it is not me that you are in disagreement with but rather with the bible.
I am saying that all people are condemned regardless of whether they have heard the gospel or not.God also condemns people that have heard the gospel. But what you seem to be implying is that unless they hear the gospel all people are condemned and that is a false conclusion on your part.
Quote him and show his error in theology based upon his observation of the text, or understand that your fussing is empty of any substance.Contrary to what you said I do not hate Calvin but I will say that he was a very poor example of someone that claimed to be a Christian.
King David killed a man so that he could have that man's wife as his own.I have seen people say that he was just a man of his time but that is the problem he was just a man of his time where, as a Christian, he should not have been. He should have risen above the petty intrigues of his time but he did not.
Silverhair, you never interpret the verses you post.As for what you call my railing, that is just me responding to comments made on this or other threads as the case may be. What I have noticed is that many of the responses I receive are attacks on me rather than dealing with the text of the bible I have posted. So it seems all the railing is coming from those that do not like what I have posted.
Your imagination is kicking in again.As I said before I must be hitting a nerve.
There is nothing wrong in the scripture you post.
You have not shown us that the scripture you post teaches what you teach. I have said that the scripture you post proves my point.
Here's your fallacy. I agree with the clarity of scripture that you post. The scripture proves my point. The scripture you post proves you wrong, yet you cannot imagine that to be true.
I am saying that all people are condemned regardless of whether they have heard the gospel or not.
"For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." Our sin condemns us, Silverhair.
There is no false conclusion on my part.
Quote him and show his error in theology based upon his observation of the text, or understand that your fussing is empty of any substance.
King David killed a man so that he could have that man's wife as his own.
Do you see the pettiness of your argument?
What observations of the Bible did Calvin make that you hate?
Silverhair, you never interpret the verses you post.
Share the passage and interpret it for us. Tell us how you read the verse and how you interpret the verse.
I read the verses you post and I think, "Yes, those are in the Bible and I love those verses."
You seem to think that all who read those verses will be appalled by them as though they are revolting. Here's a news flash, those verses are great. What's not great is the philosophical implication you spin on the verses without ever once interpreting the verses.
Try interpreting the verses you are posting.
Your imagination is kicking in again.
You haven't bid adieu. I must be hitting a nerve. (See how that works)
Stop being silly with your petty comments.