1. I am not sure it is against the law to give your child a cup of beer in your own house, But you can research that and bring it forth since you believe it is fact. Also, you will find that in some countries it is not against their laws at all for they have no law governing the private consumption of alcohol.
Section 244.085(3) of the Kentucky Revised Statutes provides:
A person under 21 years of age shall not possess for his or her own use or purchase or attempt to purchase or have another purchase for him or her any alcoholic beverages. No person shall aid or assist any person under 21 years of age in purchasing or having delivered or served to him or her any alcoholic beverages.
I believe most of the states have similar laws.
2. You'll have to give an example of the difference and as to why one reaction would be bad and the other good
.This is from a report by the American Medical Association.
The brain goes through dynamic change during adolescence, and alcohol can seriously damage long- and short-term growth processes. Frontal lobe development and the refinement of pathways and connections continue until age 16, and a high rate of energy is used as the brain matures until age 20. Damage from alcohol at this time can be long-term and irreversible. In addition, short-term or moderate drinking impairs learning and memory far more in youth than adults. Adolescents need only drink half as much to suffer the same negative effects.
There are scores of similar findings in other reports.
3. No judgment is necessary for the parent would be the one in charge of how much the child recieved. According to your postion a parent should have no problem sitting down and having a glass of beer with their child as long as the amount is in proportion with the wieght of the child.
It doesn't work that way. See the AMA report cited above. By your logic, a 40 pound child should be able to drink 20% as much as a 200 pound man. However, the effects on children are proportionately more severe.
The point is not how much but rather should the example of "do as I say and not as I do" be taught by Christians. If their is nothing wrong with taking mood drugs then by all means give the child a drink and stop being a Pharisee.
It's not "Do as I say, not as I do." It's telling children thay can't drink until they are 21. After that drink responsibly and if you can't drink responsibly, then refrain from drinking.
I am noticing that it sure is tough trying to defend drug consumption for pleasures sake. Why do Christians even try? I guess the love of beer is stronger than the love of righteousness.
So you are saying drinking is a sin. As someone said earlier here, I guess Jesus and the apostles would be denied admission to your church? Talk about being a Pharisee! Or maybe you're like the temperence lady who encountered a man drinking in a bar and upbraided him for this practice. The man replied, "Lady don't you know that Jesus Christ himself turned water into wine?" To which the lady retorted, "Yes, and I would have thought a lot more of him if he hadn't done that."