adisciplinedlearner
New Member
That's my question, too.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I have had lots of wine. It DOES add good flavor or else we wouldn't cook with it. .
Why do you say I will never understand this debate unless I've been drunk? God never got drunk but He wrote about it....
Ann;
Alcohol is a gift from God. We are not to get drunk but are to enjoy His blessing.
Ann;
And when I drank, I never felt the affects of the alcohol. Apparently you were a drunk. I was not. One glass of wine over the course of a meal wouldn't make me feel anything other than feeling "yum - that was good".
I can see how an alcoholic could think the taste is bad, but those of us who aren't might still like it.
How should we recognize drunkenness? Is it when a person has slurred speech and cannot walk a straight line?
Being a pastor comes with certain expectations in my book and being in control of my emotions and actions is one of those expectations (not that I always succeed, mind you). Plus, I work with addicts as part of my ministry so I need to set a good example in that area.
The choice to abstain from alcohol totally is a wise choice, for most cannot even drink one drink without falling into the state of being drunk, which is the sin.
Face it, everyone knows why a person consumes alcohol. It has nothing to do with taste, therein lies the problem and the sin. God judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart.
Ask yourself (not you pastor, speaking to the board here), Just why do you want that drink? Is it to get that feeling? That feeling is "drunk". Look it up.
You make a statement that, "most cannot even drink one drink without falling into the state of being drunk", but do you have proof for that statement?
.
Using your reasoning, if one glass of wine is wrong, then by the same estimation a bag of potato chips must be equally wrong.
An addict is a person who allows the substance, thought, item, or habit to CONTROL their lives.
I do not know Ann personally, but she has never lied to me on this forum and I can take her word for it that she does not lose control after a glass of wine. If she did, I am sure that her husband would step in.
The choice to abstain from alcohol totally is a wise choice
I've not agreed with many of your posts.
IMO, they've been too harsh, lacked grace, and at times been factually incorrect.
But...let's give credit for credit is due. I agree with your above statement.
(my reasons for supporting it were stated earlier in the thread, and on other selected BB locales)
Yes, you need to read the whole thread thus far. It has been proven buy science.
Chips cannot make you drunk. The topic here is alcohol and how God warns against it's effects. God says don't even look upon it. I take that as wrong to drink it at all.
Allows? If one is addicted to a drug it means they cannot resist the drug. Now how did they get to this place? By flirting with a drug that they knew could cause addiction.
I don't have the time or inclination to wade through the whole thread, so I'll take your word for it. But "science" also has "proven" evolution and "global warming".
No but chips can make you fat, increase your cholesterol, cause diabetes and contribute to a whole heap of other health issues. We have a family in our church that has a terrible food addiction- the whole family is grossly overweight and has lost limbs due to diabetes. I submit to you that if they had not eaten the first potato chip then they might not be food addicts today.
Ann is not an addict. Some people can have a glass of two of wine, and IMHO it is not sin for them to do so.
We're not going to agree. I think it is up to the individual believer. I do not promote it nor use it, but I also do not condemn someone doing the same thing our Lord did at His last meal before the cross. He didn't have grape juice.
That is exactly what He had
First, forget about the cooking part because no one can get "merry" eating food cooked with a little alcoholic wine. We are talking about drinking it.
You are not grasping the FACT that if you REMOVE the ALCOHOL and cook with the wine HAVING NO ALCOHOL you will get the SAME "good flavor" and probably even BETTER without the pungent alcohol part.
Ann, you can buy NON-ALCOHOLIC wine and get the good flavor. I have explained this at least three times to you and you keep missing the "ALCOHOL" part.
Because you believe that the alcohol part is what makes the wine "yummy". It's not, it's what makes the wine "toxic".
Here are your own words...
then you said....
1) You have no idea what alcohol alone taste like. You have only drank "good juice" which masked the alcohol that was present in it. The "yummy" you taste is the juices. Go and drink a shot of just alcohol and then come tell me how "yummy" it was.
2) You have never partaken in the "merry" that comes from the effects of the alcohol. You admitted you have never had enough wine to ever feel anything but the "Yum" from the flavor from the juices.
Now if you truly believe that alcohol is God's gift to you then why aren't you drinking it to experience it's effects, getting "merry"? A glass of wine with a meal will do nothing for "merry". In combination with the food the alcohol gets too diluted to cause a "merry".
Have you ever been "merry" on wine Ann? If not, then you have no idea what this debate is all about. It appears that you believe that "merry" means "yummy".
Ann has it right. She has never felt any effect from alcohol. She has never been guilty of drunkenness even though she has had beverages with alcohol in them.
This can only be recognized by the person doing the drinking. As soon as one feels the drug effecting their mind or mood they are now drunk by definition.
Face it, everyone knows why a person consumes alcohol. It has nothing to do with taste, therein lies the problem and the sin.