• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Will of God in the Fall of Man

Status
Not open for further replies.

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So you do not believe in a permissive will of God? I ask only to seek clarification. Thanks and I love you my Brother.
God has only one will....
Theologian s create this kind of classification trying to explain God's will of decree,to those who cannot face the truth or grasp it.
It opens the door to carnal speculation like we find in post 39 which becomes disputes over words and carnal philosophy.
I do not go there
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
How about we define sin as simply rebelling against God. I'm not sure sin is anything more than this but I'm open to correction.

Evil is a bit difficult to define. We may define it as the total sum of all unpleasant consequences of sinning or rebelling against God.

In that case, did God DESIGN and PLAN man's Sin, and by extension Evil?
I also understand sin as rebellion against God, so I am comfortable with that definition (I am not sure about Calvin and MacArthur). Insofar as to the Fall being within or outside if God's providence, I believe Scripture presents the sin of man as within that scope.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G530A using Tapatalk
 

rigz

Member
God has only one will....
Theologian s create this kind of classification trying to explain God's will of decree,to those who cannot face the truth or grasp it.
It opens the door to carnal speculation like we find in post 39 which becomes disputes over words and carnal philosophy.
I do not go there

what do you understand by the term 'will of God'?
 

rigz

Member
I also understand sin as rebellion against God, so I am comfortable with that definition (I am not sure about Calvin and MacArthur). Insofar as to the Fall being within or outside if God's providence, I believe Scripture presents the sin of man as within that scope.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G530A using Tapatalk
I have no idea what 'within or outside of God's providence' means to you, but I'm interested in whether God WANTED Adam to eat the fruit.
 

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Excuse me but are you not conflating foreknowledge and Cause?
Well, let's be honest here. None of us has ever known His mind or can be His counsellor. Not saying you are purporting this...just saying. Here's the specifics of what is revealed in Adam's fall. God makes the Garden and places Adam therein. He then puts Adam to sleep and from a rib He makes Eve to be his help-mate. God had already previously told Adam what he could and could not eat. The tree of knowledge of good and evil was placed there by God. Eve, being beguiled by the serpent(Satan) eats and gives to Adam and he eats and both die spiritually. That is what we know as biblical irrefutable fact. Now, Adam was not coerced into eating of that fruit, he freely chose to. This is where the different views part ways. Did Adam sin in accord with God's permissive will or decretive will? I see it as both. God does not desire any to sin, yet He allows sin to be here and now, and it also fulfills His plan. It is just like the crucifixion of Christ. Those who cried 'crucify Him' over-and-over again freely did as their hearts desired. Yet, it was decreed that He would be numbered with the transgressors, He would be as a Lamb led to the slaughter, He would die for the sins of His ppl, etc.

Nothing really catches God by surprise and nobody is disputing this.
Correct.

Where it gets hazy is when you ascribe man's rebellion to God's Will which you then classify as 'permissive'. Will in my mind means INTENTION and PURPOSE. So unless you are comfortable with God INTENDING and PURPOSING man to fall, I find the phrase 'permissive will' totally out of place and highly misleading.
God leaving man to their own devices fulfills His will. See the crucifixion of Christ.

When I look at the subject verses, it is mighty clear that God's Will was 'do not eat'. Eating was rebellion/sinning/defying God's will. Do you dispute this?
And if they did not eat, no Christ. There is no 'plan B.'
 

rigz

Member
Well, let's be honest here. None of us has ever known His mind or can be His counsellor. Not saying you are purporting this...just saying. Here's the specifics of what is revealed in Adam's fall. God makes the Garden and places Adam therein. He then puts Adam to sleep and from a rib He makes Eve to be his help-mate. God had already previously told Adam what he could and could not eat. The tree of knowledge of good and evil was placed there by God. Eve, being beguiled by the serpent(Satan) eats and gives to Adam and he eats and both die spiritually. That is what we know as biblical irrefutable fact. Now, Adam was not coerced into eating of that fruit, he freely chose to. This is where the different views part ways. Did Adam sin in accord with God's permissive will or decretive will? I see it as both. God does not desire any to sin, yet He allows sin to be here and now, and it also fulfills His plan. It is just like the crucifixion of Christ. Those who cried 'crucify Him' over-and-over again freely did as their hearts desired. Yet, it was decreed that He would be numbered with the transgressors, He would be as a Lamb led to the slaughter, He would die for the sins of His ppl, etc.


Correct.


God leaving man to their own devices fulfills His will. See the crucifixion of Christ.


And if they did not eat, no Christ. There is no 'plan B.'

Good.
At this very point I request you to DEFINE Will of God and then try and define your own classes.

As far as the cross is concerned, you are digressing. When you mean 'it was decreed', do you mean God commanded it to be so say as in creation?
 

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
God has only one will....
Theologian s create this kind of classification trying to explain God's will of decree,to those who cannot face the truth or grasp it.
It opens the door to carnal speculation like we find in post 39 which becomes disputes over words and carnal philosophy.
I do not go there
I can see the Reformed view within you. I do not mean this snarkly, as you know how I am and what I am saying.

To try to probe into places where it involves trying to get at God's thoughts are way too scary. It seems to me, that through studying, God does have a permissive will as well as a decretive will. We know He truly desires none to sin, but yet He did not stop Adam from doing it. We know He gets no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but in His holiness and righteousness, He has to punish them. So it appears He does have these two wills.

But I am open to you teaching me more of your view. :)
 
Last edited:

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Thank you.
Is it in order to define God's commandment not to eat as permissive Will?
You are asking me things that I am not entirely sure of, as this is in regards to God's mind. It is via my studying that I see God as having a permissive will. But I have old furniture with me as I am ~ 3 years removed from being in the free will camp. It is a laborious task of trying to study and grasp God's word. But a prosperous endeavor at that. So I do think it was God's permissive will they broke, but I could be wrong.

I am always open to correction.
 

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Very good. :)

At this very point I request you to DEFINE Will of God and then try and define your own classes.
Permissive will=Allows sin to be part of His plan...decretive will. God allowed(permissive) Adam to sin to bring Christ as the Redeemer of His chosen ppl.
Decretive will=God uses unregenerate ppl to crucify our Lord to propitiate God, to appease His wrath, so that He can justify the ungodly. To shed His blood to atone for...blot out the sins of those He came to die in their stead for.

As far as the cross is concerned, you are digressing.
Howso?

When you mean 'it was decreed', do you mean God commanded it to be so say as in creation?
The crucifixion? Yes it was decreed...decretive will of God at work.
 

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In regards to either will, sin plays a part in them. If God decretively willed Adam to eat, sin came about. If He permissively decreed him to eat, sin came about.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I can see the Reformed view within you. I do not mean this snarkly, as you know how I am and what I am saying.

To try to probe into places where it involves trying to get at God's thoughts are way too scary. It seems to me, that through studying, God does have a permissive will as well as a decretive will. We know He truly desires none to sin, but yet He did not stop Adam from doing it. We know He gets no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but in His holiness and righteousness, He has to punish them. So it appears He does have these two wills,

But I am open to you teaching me more of your view. :)
A.W.Pink has a nice simple 2 pg article on this in pdf form at chapel library.....Google it and it will get at the idea I am expressing. .......All is contained by Gods will.of decree.
 

Internet Theologian

Well-Known Member
So do you see it in scripture that God has a permissive and decretive will, or only one decretive will, Brother?
It looks obvious that God has decreed all things, and has permitted things thereby. I always recall Job where he received both good and evil by God's permission, and that in claiming this he didn't sin with his lips in saying so. Seems a fine line to walk but Job was most definitely mature in his understanding and faith in God.

Many flip out over this and go off saying 'Wait, you're saying God authored...!!!!!!!!!!!!!'
 

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A.W.Pink has a nice simple 2 pg article on this in pdf form at chapel library.....Google it and it will get at the idea I am expressing. .......All is contained by Gods will.of decree.
If this is the same article, AWP wrote something that seems very close to what I am trying to parlay.

"The decrees of God relate to all future things without exception; whatever is done in time, was foreordained before time began. God’s purpose was concerned with everything, whether great or small, whether good or evil. But with reference to the latter we must be careful to state that while God is the Orderer and Controller of sin, He is not the Author of it in the same way that He is the Author of good. Sin could not proceed from a Holy God by positive and direct creation, but only by decretive permission and negative action. God’s decree, as comprehensive as His government, extends to all creatures and events. It was concerned about our life and death; about our state in time, and our state in eternity. As God works all things after the counsel of His own will, we learn from His works what His counsel is (was), as we judge an architect’s plan by inspecting the building erected under his direction."

https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/sdg/attributes_online.html#chapter2

Is this the same article, Brother Iconoclast?
 

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It looks obvious that God has decreed all things, and has permitted things thereby. I always recall Job where he received both good and evil by God's permission, and that in claiming this he didn't sin with his lips in saying so. Seems a fine line to walk but Job was most definitely mature in his understanding and faith in God.

Many flip out over this and go off saying 'Wait, you're saying God authored...!!!!!!!!!!!!!'
But that which you bolded appears to be purporting both wills. Having come from the free will camp, I am still trying to hammer out all the DoG details. Please help me out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top