1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured If Adam Hadn't Sinned...

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Internet Theologian, Apr 23, 2016.

  1. TomLaPalm

    TomLaPalm Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2016
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    8
    re-deem means more than purchase of a new item but to regain possession .
    Reconcile has a previous relationship as well. One cannot reconcile with a new friend .

    All that was created could exist in Heaven, Sin even first existed in Heaven. No redemption in Heaven though, It could not because there is no "kinship" of the created beings. There is no brotherhood.
    Only those who sinned need redemption, Redemption , by one for many, could only occurr in a physical world where flesh and blood exist and are shared by sinners.

    So the only reason the physical world exists is redemption, everything else could or did occur in Heaven
     
    #81 TomLaPalm, May 11, 2016
    Last edited: May 11, 2016
  2. TomLaPalm

    TomLaPalm Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2016
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    8
    I got Romans.

    It is very dangerous of you to develop doctrine solely from an English translation. Especially compounded with Humanism . Do you not understand inherited sin is a trick of the devil that ultimately reduces to blaming God for your sinful state?



    Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
    Rom 1:20
    For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
    Rom 1:21
    Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
    Rom 1:22

    Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,


    When did they know GOD?
     
  3. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    ="TomLaPalm,
    Friend...if you had romans you would not question the teaching.

    So....if that is so, give me a translation that you believe captures these passages more accurately...let's see what you have got!CautiousCautiousCautious I think you are bluffing...Sneaky
    This is borderline incoherent. Who mentioned humanism at all?Cautious

    This shows you do not understand Romans yet...sorry but you are grasping at the proverbial straws



    Before the flood men had a knowledge of God but turned to idolatry as they were dead in Adam.
     
  4. TomLaPalm

    TomLaPalm Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2016
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    8

    The verses says sinners knew God. A relationship, Previously

    You mentioned Humanism , but you didn't know it.

    Humanism, or placing undue importance on the human experience over the spiritual , is throughout translations. You dwell in it by blaming Adam for your sinful state. It is a deception .

    Blaming Adam for our sin is plainly contradicts Ezekiel 18

    Here is where man blames God

    Eze 18:25
    Yet ye say, The way of the Lord is not equal. Hear now, O house of Israel; Is not my way equal? are not your ways unequal?

    Eze 18:30
    Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, every one according to his ways, saith the Lord GOD. Repent, and turnyourselves from all your transgressions; so iniquity shall not be your ruin.


    Compare the English, Young's Literal Translation or read the NT direct (literal) Greek or Aramaic, not the reverse interlinear either. It is difficult (for me at least) but very rewarding.
     
  5. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Forgive my forgetfulness, brother. We have discussed your ideas about the spiritual and physical, and the necessity of the physical world in order to redeem the spiritual, on another thread. I had failed to make the connection. I still strongly disagree with your viewpoint, but (now that my brain is functioning at least at half capacity) recalling your position I can make sense of your posts.
     
  6. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    "TomLaPalm,

    yes...before the flood

    .
    no...not at all

    nonsense
    you do not understand ezk 18
    I do not blame God at all.

    these verses have no bearing on this discussion

    That is till english...it just places the word order more as the greek text does.

    yes...so you show me from the greek how romans 3;23 does not teach what i declared it does.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. SovereignGrace

    SovereignGrace Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    5,536
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Faith:
    Baptist
    When ppl stray from the Federal Headship of Adam, doctrines run amuck. Such an example is in this thread now.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I don't think straying from the federal headship of Adam is the source of the "amuckness" here.
     
  9. SovereignGrace

    SovereignGrace Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    5,536
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Why did you disagree,.Jon? Look at TLP's stance. It is off the rails, theologically speaking.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. SovereignGrace

    SovereignGrace Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    5,536
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Faith:
    Baptist
    TLP's posts prove otherwise.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Internet Theologian

    Internet Theologian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2015
    Messages:
    2,223
    Likes Received:
    991
    Yep. No reason to disagree here.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I agree that it's "off the rails", but I think his detour is a bit deeper than denying the federal headship of Adam. Had I not remembered other conversations, I may have agreed with you. (I don't mean anything negative, brother, just that I don't think that doctrine answers for his theology. I believe his position and our positions are farther apart than you indicate).

    Maybe this will help explain why I disagreed:

    http://www.baptistboard.com/threads/why-did-god-create-the-physical-universe.98798/
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Do you believe that the difference between TLP's position is that he rejects the Federal Headship of Adam?

    Please, brother, explain how that difference accounts for his position.
     
  14. Internet Theologian

    Internet Theologian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2015
    Messages:
    2,223
    Likes Received:
    991
    It wouldn't amount to a profitable engagement so I'll pass. I choose the 'quick response' method. It expresses my opinion concisely.
     
  15. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I believe the disagreement between your position and Tom's is greater than his denial of the headship of Adam.

    I'm pulling your position a bit farther away from TLP's as I think there is a larger gulf between his view and yours on this point. You seem to have a biblical view here, brother, and I thought the emphasis important. :)
     
  16. TomLaPalm

    TomLaPalm Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2016
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    8

    I am not question the teaching from God's Word at all. I do strongly question man 's misinterpretation of the meaning and the willingness to choose man's opinions over clear scripture.

    is it your position Ezekial 18 is wrong?
     
  17. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yep. That and so much more. Thumbsup

    Rating a thread is so much more concise than than a brief but comprehensive explanation..:rolleyes:...that is, if you have no comprehension to offer.....O O

    ....."concise" means "brief but comprehensive"....your rating is brief but not comprehensive....comprehension being a play on words......O O.....comprehend? LaughLaughLaughLaugh
     
  18. TomLaPalm

    TomLaPalm Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2016
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    8

    yes, I believe the federal headship of Adam is a minor error compared to the most important point., It is difficult to measure to whom I am responding .

    But let us try, Consider if "THE souls of MEN are the fallen elohyim. or "angels". We are the bad guys in the Bible narrative and that Humanity is the method of redemption

    Consider, the expulsion, the necessity of the physical world, and the method of redemption , Purpose for Israel, even Scripture etc. if the statement is true

    I know with your knowledge of Scripture you can think about this scenario i objectively in detail . You may find an possible error I cannot overcome
     
  19. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I did not say ezk was wrong....I said your understanding of it as a contradiction to Paul in Romans is a falsehood. You misunderstand both verses, you fail to grasp the implications of the fall and it's lasting effects on man.
    Until you understand this accurately, you will not properly understand the gospel as it is linked by the Holy Spirit in Romans 5.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  20. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    This is unbiblical nonsense. It is non christian mythology....this is all that is lefty when you depart from scripture.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
Loading...