Featured Are Human Beings Born Sinners?

How else could any child get to heaven?

Without faith, it is impossible to please God.

 

Where in the Bible does it say too young to believe?

God can impart faith into the unborn

He is God

 

Eisegesis.

 

Before I was 'born again' I did not know how to refuse evil.
Before I was 'born again' I did not know how to choose good.
Before I was 'born again' I choose evil and refused good ... it had NOTHING to do with being an innocent "child".

I can understand English.
The scripture says "before the boy knows how to refuse the evil" ... that says that the boy CANNOT REFUSE evil. That does not say that the boy cannot choose evil. Anyone that has had to teach a two year old to share understands the truth of this verse.

 

You should know only those given to Christ on the basis of God crediting their faith as righteousness go to heaven. God does not need His word "fixed" to provide a loop hole for little tykes and the feeble minded. He will provide perfect justice for all.

 

Based on what? That is nothing but your bias being read into the passage.

Where does it say anything about "meeting" him in the sense that they will be alive together? You read that into the passage, it isn't there.

Yes

That is not what the passage says. Nowhere does it say he celebrated with a feast. It simply says he ate food.

Based on what? How can that ONLY mean heaven? You read that into the passage.

This is not found anywhere in the passage. It does not say that David's son was not a sinner. It just doesn't. That is unbiblical.

 

That is not the Word of God, that is your false bible.

 

@SavedByGrace you rated the above post as "funny" because you can't interact with it. Are you so prideful that you cannot admit when you are wrong?

 

Why can you not interact with the arguments? You are reading things into Scripture that simply are not there. Eisegesis.

 

How is it the wicked are born liars, Psalms 58:3, " The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies."
Revelation, 21:8, ". . . and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death."

 

I think you must be confusing what I posted with something else.
Firstly you reference Martyn Lloyd-Jones, when the article was by Spurgeon, and secondly you have drawn the exact opposite of what what Spurgeon wrote Here is an extract:

'On what ground, then, do we believe the child to be saved? We believe it to be as lost as the rest of mankind, and as truly condemned by the sentence which said, 'In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.' It is saved because it is elect. In the compass of election, in the Lamb's book of life, we believe there shall be found written millions of souls who are only shown briefly on earth, and then stretch their wings for Heaven.

They are saved, too, because they were redeemed by the precious blood of Jesus Christ. He who shed his blood for all his people, bought those dying in infancy with the same price with which he redeemed their parents, and therefore are they saved because Christ was Sponsor for them, and suffered in their stead.''

What Spurgeon is saying here is that although infants come into the world as sinners (Psalms 51:5 etc.), he believes that those who die in infancy are, without exception, redeemed by the blood of Christ. No one is obliged to agree with that, but that is what he believed. This is in line with the Reformed confessions, including the 1689 (10:3), of which he was a passionate supporter. He issued a reprint of the Confession in 1855 and had a copy buried in the foundations of the Metropolitan Tabernacle when it was being built.
What he emphatically did not believe is what you are falsely accusing him of believing; that babies are somehow born without sinful nature. If you have children or grandchildren, observation should have taught you something radically different even if the Scriptures do not persuade you.