Flawless Bible Poll

It has too many serious errors to be considered Christian. Did you know Christ's death was a plan B and not the intention of his coming, according to Dispies? How wicked is that?

 

NO translation in any language.

But EVERY valid translation in any language is perfect for God's intended use of it.

The most-perfect Bible man could have would be made of every known ancient Scriptural manuscript, untranslated. BUT HOW MANY PEOPLE COULD READ ALL OF IT ?

 

WITH ALL DUE RESPECT:

Have you taken the time to check out the Greek for yourself, to see which renderings are the MOST-ACCURATE? You might not like the results !

 

The majority of the Jews of that time spoke Aramaic, which was the "lingua franca" of the time. Thus, it was considered a 'hebrew tongue'.

And, if you check, you'll find that the name "Bethesda" is of CHALDEE origin.

 

Check out the Greek for "robbery". You might not like the results.

The Greek word there, 'harpagmos', means to seize or grasp, & is applied to robbery and non-robbery seizing as well. Thus, "not robbery" & "not to be grasped" are both correct.

 

Where's THAT come from?????????????????????? Isaiah & Daniel both prophesied He'd be suffering and would be "cut off", meaning an early death.

 

The Dispensationalists believe this according to the Scofield Bible notes. It is among other heretical beliefs found in the first Scofield notes. Are you a "Dispy"?

 

It's in the notes. Also, another heresy is where Scofield said the Sermon on the Mount is not for the church. But for the Jews in the Millennium. How demonic is this? John says if anyone has not the doctrine of Christ, they are not saved. Mathew calls the Sermon on the Mount "the doctrine of Christ". Many got rolled by Dispensationalism and it is so bizarre, it takes lots of studies to see how evil it is.

 

When I was first studying the Bible seriously, I used a Ryrie Study Bible. I read the Bible cover to cover and found Ryrie's notes to be helpful in the Old Testament. But when it came to the gospels, it was clear that Ryrie believed that Jesus was going to set up the Millennial Kingdom of God upon the earth, but delayed that because of His rejection by the Jews. Therefore, the church age is "Plan B."

Having read the Old Testament and the rest of the New Testament, especially Paul's writings, I struggled as to how to interpret the New Testament. I finally realized that Ryrie's notes were simply his opinions, and I had to have the courage to go with what the scripture actually taught instead of Ryrie's interpretation. That taught me a huge lesson as I started over with the scripture and made sure that everything that I was taking as fact was backed up somewhere in the text of scripture. It revolutionized my study.

 

I am certainly not a "full dispy, such as preterists make out all anti=preterisms to be. I believe there are 5 dispensations, the ways God interacted/interacts with man They are:
1.) the world before the flood
2.) the world between the flood & Exodus
3.) the world between the Exodus & Jesus' ministry/resurrection
4.) the present age, between Jesus' resurrection & His return
5.) the future world after Jesus' return

Hard to dispute those "dispensations".

 

That's why I don't use "study Bibles".

 

Impressive! However, scripture never mentions them.

 

That would be the very Originals themselves!

 

NO translation was either inspired, nor exact copy of the originals!

 

The are known issues in the OT texts regarding numbers at times!

 

God preserved the words in the Translations, but did not inspire any translation, nor is there any perfect copy of the originals!

 

Take the Critical Greek text, and amend it in the certain areas where the MT/Bzt is to be seen as being the preferred rendering, and then translate into English!

 

ONLY KJVO claims to have a perfect translation though!