KenH
Well-Known Member
Are you sure you understand what the sovereignty of God entails.?
With my puny human brain? Of course not.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Are you sure you understand what the sovereignty of God entails.?
You wanted to deflect from John 12:32 and what "all" means in that text so you jump to another verse in the attempt to support your odd view.
You seem to have a real problem with context Ken.
What does Luk 2:1 have to do with John 12:32 except that the word "all" is found in both verses.
So Jesus blood actually covers the sins of literally all mankind? If so, thats universalism
I know you're a good person, Ken, but that is some messed up theology you're following right there!
A total misunderstanding of God's sovereignty. What a mess it is!
The fact that Jesus did indeed die for all the sins of all humanity does not mean every person will automatically be saved. Each person has to trust in Christ individually. If Christ died only for the elect, which is not substantiated by any Bible verse, then the unsaved have an excuse for not responding to the gospel.True. Those opposed to salvation by the free sovereign grace of God, including the Biblical truth of particular redemption, try to run away from the logical conclusion that arises from their teaching that Christ paid the sin debt of every person that will ever live, namely, that if Christ paid the sin debt for every person who will ever live, then every person who will ever live will be, must be, saved. That is the logical conclusion of their false teaching, regardless of how much they try in vain to deny it.
I was not deflecting.
No, I just disagree with your false gospel.
I was simply proving that you can't just assume every time you see the word "all" that it means every person on earth, as obviously in Luke 2:1 it does not.
The whole world of the elect, in other words the atonement was not just national in scope but international, covering a people located throughout the world.If God chooses who will be saved, what was the purpose of the atonement in that as John said, He is the satisfaction for the sins of the whole world?
The whole world of the elect, in other words the atonement was not just national in scope but international, covering a people located throughout the world.
Ever notice Calvinists say something in one post and then deny they said it in another. This ploy is to change the subject from the topic of the thread.I don't know how you turn "Many seek" that I wrote into "many do not actually seek" that you wrote.
Thats a false gospel, it was only for Gods electThe atonement was for all of humanity BF
1 John 2:2 says Jesus is the means of reconciliation for the whole of humanity. 2 Peter 2:1 tells us Jesus bought even those heading for destruction.Thats a false gospel, it was only for Gods elect
Flowers has an infuriating tendency to edit other people's videos and then claim they support his view when they don't. At the 4:30 mark is an example. Mac is not saying that people always had their own innate ability to come to Christ any time. He is saying that there is a time period where they are called and the Spirit is working and warning them lest they refuse.I give you John MacArthur to answer some of the question.![]()
John MacArthur Contradicts Calvinism | Dr. Leighton Flowers | Soteriology 101
Dr. Leighton Flowers plays two sermons by Dr. John MacArthur which seem to present a blatant contradiction. One argues for Calvinism's doctrine of total mora...www.youtube.com
Thats a false gospel, it was only for Gods elect
Intercession is not a Calvinist doctrine.Flowers has an infuriating tendency to edit other people's videos and then claim they support his view when they don't. At the 4:30 mark is an example. Mac is not saying that people always had their own innate ability to come to Christ any time. He is saying that there is a time period where they are called and the Spirit is working and warning them lest they refuse.
It is just as inconsistent for a Provisionist to pray that someone who has heard the gospel and not yet become a Christian - get saved. After all, they have been provided with everything necessary and it is now up to them. Any "interference" by the Holy Spirit smacks of Calvinism and is a manipulation of their free will.
For clarification, specifically the deterministic approaches of Calvinism is what I am referring to, and in relation to salvation.Intercession is not a Calvinist doctrine.
There is a balance between Hyper cal and Arminianism.
There are some things that I would view as hyper cal that most Calvinists would not. Because they go beyond what Scripture teaches and require different definitions taken from other books of the Bible, and out of context, I consider them hyper.
But if intercession is strictly a doctrine of Calvin in your definition, we can at least agree that we should be interceding.
In either case, what Mac says about it does appear to contradict himself. I don’t see how anything that you add to those statements fixes them up into everything else that he preaches.
You are right I think. Most non-Catholic Christians I know believe that the Holy Spirit is either the driving force or at least essential in the sense of a calling or convicting and without it no one would come. And they also believe that people can reject this calling and ruin themselves by doing so. And most people believe that everyone who hears the gospel has at least "some light, some calling" as John R. Rice used to say.There is a balance between Hyper cal and Arminianism.
There are some things that I would view as hyper cal that most Calvinists would not. Because they go beyond what Scripture teaches and require different definitions taken from other books of the Bible, and out of context, I consider them hyper.
But if intercession is strictly a doctrine of Calvin in your definition, we can at least agree that we should be interceding.
He does. So does Calvin and Owen. I don't see how you can escape the idea that our free will, depraved as it is, is not involved somewhere in all this. If nothing more than that we can be so obstinate that God will eventually say that he judicially withdraws gracious influence and conviction and respects your wishes.In either case, what Mac says about it does appear to contradict himself. I don’t see how anything that you add to those statements fixes them up into everything else that he preaches.
Flowers has an infuriating tendency to edit other people's videos and then claim they support his view when they don't. At the 4:30 mark is an example. Mac is not saying that people always had their own innate ability to come to Christ any time. He is saying that there is a time period where they are called and the Spirit is working and warning them lest they refuse.
It is just as inconsistent for a Provisionist to pray that someone who has heard the gospel and not yet become a Christian - get saved. After all, they have been provided with everything necessary and it is now up to them. Any "interference" by the Holy Spirit smacks of Calvinism and is a manipulation of their free will.