Search results

The eternal Son of God is neither begotten nor made to have always been the Son of God. Not light from light, but the true Light.

How is it not working? Type.or phone model? Browser? Works different than before in.some ways. The HTML layout set up a little different. My phone is a Moto g pure, Android 12. Needs to be replaced soon. Using a Chrome browser for this Website.

I have seen it done. And to me, KJV onlyism is not tenable. https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2016/04/codex-vaticanus-and-ending-of-mark.html?m=1

Codex Vanticanus supports the notion that Mark 16:9-20 is older than it's omission by it's unusual blank column which has been demonstrated it can allow it's insertion. Proverbs 30:5-6, Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his...

I believe it is a valid evidence. But not a sole evidence. God has promised in Proverbs 30:5-6, Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.

. . . but he that believeth not shall be damned.

A misstatement of fact. The number of codex of Greek copies of Mark are reported to be 1650 codex. Only 3 of them omit Mark 16:9-20.

Fact, only 3 codex mss omit Mark 16:9-20. The blank column in one ms which has room to allow for Mark 16:9-20 supports the notion Mark 16:9-20 is older than that codex. Also Colossians 1:23 for Mark 16:15. Also over 1700 codex have Mark 16:9-20.

What are you arguing? [Mark 16:16 with Acts of the Apostles 2:38?] It is explicitly my understanding that believer's baptism is never a requirement in any way in order to be saved.

And so, Revelation 20:15, And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

Thank you

One's faith comes from perceived truth. First, personal experience. Second, from the witness of others. Good logic.

The notion amillennialism is a word direct from the Scripture is simply not true. Revelation 20:1-9.

Romans 2:1. Literally are simply points of light. We moderns call them meteors. And those which land on the Earth meteorites. I had this understanding before I was a Christian.

@Jope The tribulation mentioned in Matthew 24:29, Immediately after the tribulation of those days . . . . Has not occurred yet.

With Jude 1:4 that Jesus being the LORD God has been an issue. OP post #1.

That the Lord Jesus Christ is the LORD God is not at issue. That He is both Lord and Christ [being both man and God] is at issue. Acts of the Apostles 2:36, . . . both Lord and Christ. Ephesians 5:5, . . . of Christ and God. [ASV]

That "generation" are them who see Matthew 24:29-30 events.

In Revelation 20:1-15 God says what He means.

Not at all. You seem not to understand what I had explained.