Search results

Hello and good morning. This doesn't answer my question. I asked "Who are involved in this earthly population, if not these very saints described in the verses prior (verses 1-6)?" So you don't believe there is a distinction in thrones here: Rev 3:21 ESV [Jesus speaking] The one who...

Why is it only when premillennialism is critiqued that the reign in the millennium is "temporary"? Why can't this criticism carry over into the amillennial view? And I've never encountered a premillennialist who believed Christ's reign was temporary. Can you give us your source?

Hello again :D Hope you dont mind my questions on your posts. :Cool What do you know about the gnostics that the Apostle John was against? Specifically their hermeneutics

Nice to meet you too :D So you believe these saints are in heaven, reigning with Christ. How come at the end of this thousand year reign, Satan is loosed and the world sets their targets on earthly Jerusalem? Who are involved in this earthly population, if not these very saints described in...

What is your "interpretation" of the fact that the Revelation 20:1-6 passage says that the saints reigning with Christ were beheaded? Are Christians currently universally beheaded?

[Insults edited] The covenants of God are literal and you can't refute it: just like your best teachers can't either. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We admit that Joseph is a type of Christ (literally meaning "anointed one"). Joseph was anointed with the Spirit. However, your view cannot reconcile Jesus Christ with the Joseph antitype. "The Providence of God, both general and particular, is sufficiently evidenced in the call of Abraham ...

@kyredneck @Iconoclast "Admitting the [non-literal] principle to be a correct one, how can you meet in argument those who claim that they have the Spirit equally with yourself? You cannot appeal to the letter, for that 'killeth;' you cannot appeal to the Spirit, for both profess to possess it...

Unfortunately it gets pretty cold after Revelation 11:15-18 though. "The reader is directed to Rev. 11 :18, and under the last trumpet, preceding (as all must admit) the Millennium, we have 'the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward,' etc. Here is a...

So you brazenly teach that the covenants are not fulfilled literally as the speaking party, God, made clear. It's gravely alarming that you don't see anything wrong with this. Wake up! "No title deed of human construction could be more explicit than Jehovah’s promise to Abraham regarding the...

Yes. You know that Chafer rebuts him right? I don't know what point you're trying to prove...are you trying to say the kingdom already came under David? If so, you should read the Davidic covenant again. First of all, the covenant demands that David's descendant, not David himself, shall sit...

Ask and ye shall receive, dear sir. "According to very much prophecy, the anticipated Messiah would come as a resistless Lion and as a sacrificial Lamb. Peter testifies to the perplexity of the prophets over this seeming paradox (1 Pet. 1:10-11). Isaiah blends the events connected with the two...

Good day sir. All of your historians tell us that the amillennial idea came from the very late church father, Origen who introduced many heresies into the church. Why does your view require an uninspired 3rd century heretic to promulgate it? Look at the very text that you responded to: "Prop...

The presence of an antichrist just prior to Christ's second advent proves premillennialism. Amillennialism denies the apocalypse as literal (Eusebius, Origen, Jerome, all treated the book with contempt and wanted it out of the canon, not to mention Luther). Amillennialists teach that we are...

Tell that to your friend @Iconoclast Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The reference to prop. 121 is specifically about the literal fulfillment of the Davidic covenant and God's special manifestation in the messianic kingdom dispensation. Here's a good section on Micah 4:1's usage by Justin martyr to prove that the destruction of the antichrist happens with the...

Proposition 121, especially observation 10, is a worthy section discussing this topic too, @Tim71 The work can be found on biblesupport.com or on archive.org (without the typos ;) ). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Here's some from George Peters (prominent premillennialist). There's many typos because the text version doesn't fit well into kindle, where I grabbed it from on my phone. "The language of the Apostles confi/i^med tlie Jews in th^ir Messianic hopes of the Kingdom. ... This is seen (1) from...

Oh sorry I can't read them because I've edited them for being loaded full of logical fallacies like red herrings and straw men to name a few. Darn editing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wrong again. Dispensationalism teaches that the Olivet discourse is fulfilled in Daniels future 70th week. Look up the straw man fallacy. I see that you have a [edited] method of skirting things and ignoring them when they don't fit your bias. I asked why Paul distinguishes between Jew...