Search results

no, He offers to save us, We can only accept His offer, We have no power to help ourselves

· Jesus said “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” John 3:16 (KJV 1900) Dave this is wrong. Free Will sees this as not a call to obedience but that anyone can believe an not perish unto...

He was addressing Christian converts who were Hebrews and showing how Jesus is better than the Law. These were true believers.

Who is the writer addressing?

no part of this says one failed to believe, That is man made. error The writer says they did believable and it was not necessary to discuss salvation again, because one cannot not fall away one experiencing this Heavenly Gift. but He wants to discuss growth or perfection as a Christian...

Explain why it is necessary to mention being born physically and then spiritually ? Why is physical birth required to be mentioned?

Diagram the sentence, as in HS English class,

the new believers, Hebrews, did not need again to received the initial call of Salvation because they were true believers and no one can fall away because it is impossible to re crucify Christ . He list things a true believer experiences ut to fall away suggest Christ is not all powerful but...

I did show it is wrong. I showed the error and the correct version

the point is incorrect or cannot be argued because the description of Hebrews 6 is wrong. The premise of the OP is wrong

you quote well, what is your point? Heb 6:3 And this will we do, if God permit. What will be spoken about , possibly later? Salvation. Why is initial Salvation not going to be talked about ? Heb 6:9¶ But, beloved, we are persuaded better things of you, and things that accompany salvation...

The thread is moot, the OP is wrong, These new Believers were actual converts and the verses say they will not talk of conversion but maturity because they cannot fall away. It is not a translation issue but a English sentence , a structure understanding issue.

Déjà vu all over again yall remind me of an old couple arguing the same thing, same way time after time

Obedient Christians who surrender to be lead of the Spirit are no longer in rebellion. We re reconciled with Him

so you agree, if one has a problem with His authority , they are in rebellion

It suggest there are others with power but God has the most, God has all power, no other has power at all unless it is given by God.

It is the wrong description of God and the OP suggests a incorrect premise. try omnipotent He is more than the supreme power but He is all power, no one else has any power

how did that help the discussion?

why did you need to use a synonym?