Search results

Unless you believe Paul's audience was literally only speaking to men here, "siblings" or "brothers and sisters" would be more accurate. This letter would have been read outloud to men and women alike. There is no reason contextually to restrict the noun to only men. The BDAG, EDNT and Louw &...

I think we have the 2008....though I am not 100% sure. It might be the 1991. Though I doubt it....it contains the chorus of Awesome God. So I doubt that is 1991...though it may be. I will check tomorrow. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

The Baptist Hymnal by Holman is good, and the favorite is the Trinity hymnal (baptist edition). Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

As long as Schreiner is co-chair, I don't see the CSB taking a step back. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

There is no indication that the enrollment was after. The sentence of Heb.12:23 is structured to where no discernible difference in time can be determined. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Again...you are claiming the foundation of the world was formed at the end. "Since" even makes you state more forceful. From the time period of the foundation to some time in the future....this occurred at the end of creation....your starting point, the "foundation" starts at the end of...

You said the foundation obviously starts at the very end of creation. I quoted that post. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Who builds a foundation last? The foundation would be the very first thing built. Not the last. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

That is a request by David to withhold salvation. Jonah also made such a demand of God and was denied. There is also zero indication that said book is the Lambs book of life. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Agreed Sorry I mis read you. I thought you were implying Rev 3 and 13 were different books. My fault. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Rev 3:5 is likely the same book as 13:8. However Jesus never says any name is actually blotted out. What he says is that οὐ μὴ ἐξαλείψω τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ ἐκ τῆς βίβλου τῆς ζωῆς The double negation "ου υη" is emphatic that names will not be removed. There is never one time where names are said to...

Who did??? You claimed they have "opposite" meanings. You have failed to do so. Since and before are not opposite in meaning. As bad as you want, you cannot change the tense of the Greek verb to imply the verb "written" was done after the fact. It wasnt even done at the same time. The verb, if...

Rev 20:15 does not say their names are removed. It is not found in the book. Rev 13:8 indicates their name was never written in the book. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

I am probably being paranoid, but this article raised some flags for me. Mostly because Mounce's article is basically bookended by these two statements. Is Mounce leaving it open that the NIV is open to adopting the newly defined, ever expanding, gender language of the world? "Since the issue...

You are moving the goal post. You said before and since are opposites. You have failed to even remotely prove any of your 3 claims. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

To say "is so" is absurd, which is what was claimed. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Since and before are not opposites. "To be" is a natural inference from the text. The verb εξελξατο implies the beloved have been elected to something. The election is "to be" rich in faith (πλούσιους εν πιστει). The ASV, NASB, NKJB and WEB all make the same conclusion as the ESV. There is...

What is the significance if από is taken as temporal? Based on the verb γέγραπται when did this writing take place (or not take place) in relation to the foundation of the earth? The BDAG demonstrates a legitimate usage of από "to indicate the point from which someth. begins,... (b) of time."...

The curriculum is on sexuality. Manhood Womanhood Marriage Singleness Sexual sins Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

If they are "seeking" I wouldn't think they would become cancer. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk