Search results

Deflection. Is that quantitative or qualitative? Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Yes both views are supported. That is the point. Some take it quantitative and others qualitative. You just said in one post both grammatical views are supported, which true, then you immediately claim my view that both are supported is flawed. You fully contradicted yourself in 18 words...

Absolutely but in what sense? Quantitative or qualitative? It is qualitative. For the son is God in substance, but he not Yahweh in is quantitative fullness. Jesus is not the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. He is Yahweh is substance (quality), not in quantity. *Edit: The Oness/Unitarian...

...sum of qualities....it isn't just about quantity at times. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Possible, But that requires a "qualitative" rendering(KJV) of hēttēma, vs the "quantitative" (ESV, NASB,CSB) failure, loss or defeat. Another word that can have quantitative or qualitative implications [emoji16] Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Strongs does not provide the exhaustive meaning or range of the word. I am not bound to that limited definition. But what is that material? Is it refering to the "amount" or to the "quality" of said material or vessel? "Jesus is the fullness of God", is that a quantitative or qualitative...

One of the tricky things about πλήρωμα is determining weather it is quantitative or qualitative. One issue with the Roman's 11:12 interpretation above is that the the "pleroma" is not the material or substance inside "them"(αυτων). "Them" is the substance/material. They are the "what" being...

It is a special yearly fundraiser event to raise money for North American Missionaries (U.S. & Canada). It is usually above and beyond a typical SBC churches cooperative program offering. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

I noticed that....hahaha I don't even know what her first post was. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Nope. I am talking about salvation and salvation I didn't say you were Sure I can. I don't know if they are elect. You don't know if it is his plan or not For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the Lord -Isa. 55:8 Nope...so no man shall boast Bible...

Of course one of my children may not be elect. But I rather trust God with their salvation than trust them with it. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

You have more trust in him than I do, but he is certainly better than any option the opposition has and can produce. I like his policies much more than his personality. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Philippians 1:29 For it has been granted to you that for the sake of Christ you should not only believe in him but also suffer for his sake Belief in Him (Jesus) has been graciously given (χαρίζομαι) to us. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

That would require γράφω to be in the future tense. Your argument is for the names to be written after the foundation of creation. That is the future. That is literally the opposite of what John wrote. The perfect tense requires it to be prior to creation. You actually have it occurring after...

Wallace is instructing on sentence structure. He then clear states what the perfect means. Something you continue to overlook. So, a baby is born today, he comes to faith on June 20th, 2030. When is his name written? Still waiting on you to exegete your Hebrews passage. Sent from my...

Wallace didn't disagree with me. You failed to grasp what he is saying. I never objected to your word order. Look at the definition of pefert tense he has given and how he applied it. He is objecting to your stance. The writing is already completed. The names are still there. There are not...

That is a grammatical impossibility in Rev 13:8 according to the word order you have embraced. γέγραπται (written) is not an on going action. It is a completed action with ongoing effects that are still felt. The writing is done. When was it done in relation to the "foundation of the cosmos"...

That is not what I asked. How does one say siblings? What word do you think was used in greek when refering to siblings? Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

No there is not Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Your first argument...and everything else you posted is ignorant and slanderous. The "a" god argument is a 100% impossibility. Greek grammar does not allow for it. There is a two nominatives one being a predicate nominative. "A" has no place in the sentence. Has far as αδελφοί goes you are...