Search results

...child with the Spirit. Not without. Paul is addressing behavior issues, not being with or without the Spirit. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Nothing about you statement is logical. You might as well say Paul spoke to Christisns behaving badly so that proves dogs go to Heaven. You are conflating two things unrelated. Paul does not address unbelievers understand here. He does later in chapter 2, where he says the cannot understand...

I am typing in English, am I not? You dedicated this thread to telling everyone how the NIV mistranslated the original language. If you can't read it, how can you correct it? One would logical assume you could read greek if you are telling other who to read it. Sent from my SM-G965U...

Not sure why you keep linking babes in Christ with those without the Spirit. One has the Spirit. The other doesn't and is unable to understand per Paul in 2:14. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Exactly! So why do you think this verse is talking about lost people? Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

I have addressed the meaning several times. Read my posts to you. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

So the babes in Christ are lost? Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Where does Paul says that? Where does Paul address lost people in this passage? He doesn't. Paul address them in the next chapter, where he says "The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they...

..you cant read greek??? It means "fleshly". Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

..you cant read greek??? It means "fleshly". Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

So you believe σαρκίνοις = equals babies in Christ = able to understand the things of Christ and behave accordingly...you ste right so far. But then you lose it when you say σαρκίνοις = equals baby Christians and ability to understand = a lost persons ability. The lost person is still within...

You are putting words In Paul's mouth. He calls them this due to behavior. He is still expecting Christians to behave and understand ad Christians. He is not expecting this of people without the Spirit. Paul never brings up "without the Spirit". He says they are acting fleshly. For you to...

So infants in Christ don't have "the Spirit"? Pauk is not talking to the lost here. You conclusion is well beyond the text. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Paul never says they are without the Spirit. He says they are "σαρκίνοις" He stay still exist as this in verse 3. If you want "σαρκίνοις" to mean without the Spirit, then your theology has left you with Christian's who are without the Spirit. How can they be infants in Christ but be without the...

That is a logical fallacy. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

But you did....post 65 You said they were without the Spirit. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Paul never said they were without the Spirit. Read up to verse 3. This was how they were behaving. They were behaving as a lot person, he doesn't say they lack the Holy Spirit. οὐκ ἠδυνήθην λαλῆσαι ὑμῖν ὡς πνευματικοῖς ἀλλʼ ὡς ⸀σαρκίνοις "Not able to speak to you as a spiritual person, but...

What commentaries? The NAC, NICNT, TNTC, and Pillar commentaries all disagree with your statement. The Greek is taken passive by all the above commentaries, which conveys violence. Violence was certainly being done against the Kingdom.... To John the Baptist and later to Jesus. There is...

Bevin has done a much better job than most people give him credit for. Those in my state that oppose him do so because they see him as anti-teacher, which he isn't. Or because he is Republican....and that is all it takes for them. A "R" by your name makes you trash. Not policy or...

Nope....they are a hateful bunch most of the time. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk