Search results

Again, no comments about the OP? Let's be clear: According to the OP, The following statement is true: "It is not necessary in this life for a man to repent and Call upon the name of the Lord Jesus Christ in order to receive Eternal Salvation." No comments? This blows right past us...

You mis-judge Ann.....GROSSLY. You may have gotten off on the wrong foot with her, but her challenge is sound. You could ask just about any regular poster on this board and they will tell you that she is one of the most gracious and edifying posters on this board. Personally, (and this is...

WOW folks.......we seriously have some priority issues around here: Posters have been busy crying about "racism", who is or is not from Kentucky....Whether Dr. J has a degree or whether SN is a "Calvinist" or a "DoG" er: Meanwhile, the thread began with these CLEAR statements that one is NOT...

No you aren't. It is another gospel.

That's the end-goal of that sort of world-view. It's just being snuck in under the guise of "christianity".

It's impossible to always hide your patently relativist humanistic world-view isn't it? Kind of the same way Liberal Politicians forget themselves on occasion and inadvertently tell the truth (whatever the heck that means)about what they truly believe. There is so much that is wrong with...

Hi Amy: Apparently, they come in NASB too :) don't know if you knew that. Saw Van's response and thought if you were interested, then your fav. version might be there as well. 'Course, it costs an arm and a leg. http://www.amazon.com/dp/0195279034/?tag=baptis04-20

Hi Icon: Thanks for your response.

:thumbsup: No....it was in a P.M.... so I guess not indeed :laugh: I was trying to get him to explain what he meant by "election" in his earlier thread, so I asked him in a P.M.:type: It was a P.M. I got from him ;) I mentioned that to demonstrate that he is NOT trying to convince anyone...

I think you miss his argument completely. See my edit for instance. It's not that he has a different Dictionary definition than you do. Obviously, the English Dictionary definition of a translated Greek word is something I have no doubt you share in common with him. Whatever his possible...

LOL :tongue3: In an earlier P.M. he explained your "works" complaint is precisely where his analogy breaks down...All analogies eventually break-down. But that's not the part which matters in his analogy. The key point of his analogy, you haven't mentioned. And that is, specifically, what...

How were the several hundred miles? smooth I hope?

lol.....took me an hour and a half to track down two more GAAH!! one left Winman.....you are a sadistic man.

:applause::applause: LOL I remember that one. I shook my head in shame. Mommy said something like "Remember that you are an immigrant too, so don't forget about them" (or some such drivel). This air-tight argument of mommy's apparently completely altered his perception of reality. :thumbs:

I use and also like Scofields very much. Mainly, because there are excellent cross-references, and the cross-reference system is VERY easy to use. Vs. say, a Thompsom chain where you would have to go to the back to look up everything etc. <----I DO like Thompson's as well. Just not as...

On that note: As a Floridian, I believe you are owed two things: 1.) a heart-felt "thank-you" and expression of gratitude to the State of Kentucky for Rand Paul. 2.) a sincere apology for Marco Rubio..........We thought we were doing the right thing, but as he is a chum of Juan McShame: sorry...

Winman.....I am P.M. 'ing you for my TICKET!!!!!!! :thumbs:

Here's the thing........it doesn't say anything about those who are not sanctified. It merely says that he "perfects" those who ARE sanctified. That's ALL the information it gives. It doesn't tell us everything there is to know in all of Scripture about Salvation. It says he perfected those...