Search results

http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Coptic-priest-in-Egypt-shot-dead-in-Sinai-attack-318929

Saturn, Neptune, Earth Wind & Fire, what a combination http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5iok1NvWws

Good find! I posted this link on my website.:thumbsup:

That's to ensure that whatever is discarded doesn't creep back into the planet defiling the population. Matthew 15:11-17

And I'm quite sure that planet would discard determinist feculence with magnanimous regularity :)

Don't you have a few planets to populate?

Michael Brown, a former Jew now Christian apologist (also known for his debate with James White on Calvinism), shows the side of accusations against Israel that are not reported on the media, and shows the "other side" against accusations of anti-Israeli rhetoric. Israel is accused of being an...

The fundamental difference as to why the Non Cal can answer this as not being a conflict is because even though it merely appears that an immoral conundrum exists since God created man anyway knowing he would sin and reject him, is in the libertarian view, not only can God love man because He...

The problem with the OP is that it is built on a faulty premise and trying to force the non Cals to defend a premise that they have never implied. Claiming that the Calvinist view of God regarding His INTENTION is NOT the biggest problem in Calvinism as the OP has implied in the definition of...

And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 1 Thess 5:23 Also in Hebrews 4:12, there are 3 parts in that as well, not only the dividing of soul and spirit, but the body...

You just did it. I just showed you a clear example of a premise and a conclusion. I am entitled to state what I believe the conclusion is. I can only be accused of dishonesty if I alter the PREMISE. What you just accused me of is doing exactly what I just said the Calvinists do. I did not...

Wow, that is a very huge leap from how Immanuel Kant described ought to how you have used it here. There's a whole lot more to the Kantian view of the "ought" that has absolutely nothing to do with your accusation.

What I have done is take statements directly from the mouth of John Calvin, JI Packer, John Piper, et al, and the Confessions and then shown the implications of what that means. Calvinists have a hard time dealing with implications that they perceive to be accusations against their premise. Let...

As seen quite clearly here: Jonah 3: 8 But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands. 9 Who can tell if God will turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce...

Archangel What's funny about this is that Paul was asked the same question about knowing Greek in Acts: " And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek?" 21:37:laugh: I have studied Greek for 20 years, 4...

If Cornelius had no sin, first of all, why did God send Peter to preach to him about salvation if there was nothing to be saved from? Secondly, why did Peter include this in his sermon: "To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive...

This entire analysis by you over Cornelius is absurd. Most Calvinists disagree with progressive sanctification and in this passage you go beyond that and argue for progressive regeneration and insert a transitive period from regeneration to justification, and quite a lengthy one at that...

You are making an enormous distinction without a difference here. You are attempting to make a straw man out of a mere semantic difference between "autograph" and "language". So if the KJV translators said "original LANGUAGE" instead of "original AUTOGRAPH", you make this sound as if the KJV (or...

God creating someone for the sole purpose of condemning them, and even desiring their fate, and WITHOUT a bona fide offer of salvation is cruel (and unscriptural-but yet that's the Calvinist position). Rejecting Christ when you HAVE had a bona fide offer, and you choose hell over eternity with...

You are assuming grammatical absolutes that Wallace himself does not hold regarding prepositional phrases. See page 355-359 of the same book you quoted from Wallace. Furthermore, you argue against instrumentality and then add to the text by saying God CAUSED the sanctification (the same...