Search results

the wrong angle! :D

I am saying, that David's case does NOT prove that this is the way that God deals with EVERY infant that dies. What David said could well be what God told just him!

Philip Schaff: " Romans 5:12 Rom_5:12. On this account, or, ‘therefore,’ First of all on account of the statement of Rom_5:11, but virtually on account of all that precedes, since Rom_5:11 sums up the whole doctrine of righteousness and salvation. Since ‘reconciliation’ is received through our...

No, every Calvinists here debating that I can see, all have the same angle.

Read the response

Jesus' human nature was "like" ours (read Philippians 2:5-8; Romans 8:3) it was 100% real but without any sin. This is standard theology!

Wrong, Luther was not infallible!

The election under consideration relates to election in its redemptive aspect. The Scriptures speak of an election that relates to a nation (Rom. 9:4; 11:28); one that relates to a particular office (Moses and Aaron, Ps. 105:26; David, 1 Sam. 16:12; 20:30; Solomon, 1 Chron. 28:5; the apostles...

you will not listen and learn...

Again, typical Calvinist, who gets rude when they know they are wrong!

You are so wrong as I am NOT Arminian

I am speaking generally, as those on the board

But this can be read different as the Greek of verse 12 is not clear

Its "theology"

neither do Calvinists!

Typical answer from a Calvinist!

Jesus is LIKE us in that He is sinless

Jonah was sent to preach to the PEOPLE, not the bricks! :Biggrin

Jesus is "like" other human being. the difference is that His "human nature" is sinless and therefore not fallen

David's infant son, does not mean the same for all who die in infancy. My point being that it has nothing to do with "election" or "predestined"