Anyone heard this?

lol...that's FUNNY, broAaron.

Well, I live way out in the country and we drive a 21 y/o van that was given to us, PTL.

 

Thankful and Elnora,

ALL CAPS is yelling on the internet....Im quite familiar with it. There are moments when caps are useful to add emphasis.

You can't say that any caps are yelling, otherwise you would also be offended at my capitalizing the first word of my sentences, and people's names.

LOL Aaron!

And Granny, isn't it wonderful when the Lord provides like that?

 

Is this thread about who has the oldest car or what?

 

It IS (caps used for emphasis) wonderful when the Lord provides! My husband drives a car that was given to us and I drive a 6 year old van that already has just under 167,000 miles on it and I have Christian friends who tell me they are surprised it is still running. I tell them I'm not because I pray for it!!

 

I believe that capitlizing all letters in a word is yelling and to say that you can't capitalize the first word of a sentence is stretching the point, don't you agree?

What happened to bolding a word for emphasis?

 

This troubles me greatly and i find it deplorable, But the thing that causes me much more concern is that you will find this accecptable in most SBC churches within the next ten years if the present trend continues.

 

I hope when you are in your car praying that you keep your eyes open.

 

Elnora,

having standards is not legalism.

You seem to think that it is.

You also seem to think that I don't understand about lovingly giving someone the gospel. I don't remember that that was the point of this thread, but ok.

Having standards is one's own personal conviction. It has nothing to do with whether or not we go to others with the gospel. We don't look at what they are wearing or what music is in their headset and then decide whether they need the Lord or whether we want to tell them about God. We just tell them.

Anyone who is telling you that people with standards do not care about the world around them is grossly misrepresenting people who are only trying to live as they/we believe God would have them/us live.

Yes, it does matter how we live, it does matter how we dress, it does matter what we listen to and what activities we engage in. Not for salvation's sake, but for testimony's sake and for being able to walk closer to God without the world's distractions.

Again, please do not call me a legalist when you don't really understand what the word means. "legalism" means that the person is claiming that one must live a holy life in order to
a)get saved

or

b)remain saved

This is a heresy, of course.

Like I said, simply having and holding up standards in the Christian's life is NOT the same as legalism.

 

I had to read your post twice until I realized you are on topic.

Thank you for your opinion.

 

THankful,

Ive never been able to figure out how to bold my words in a response in a forum board.

However, in ten years of being on the internet and in various chat rooms and forum boards, I have never found anyone so offended by the capitalization of one or two words in a sentence to add emphasis.

It is, in my experience, a very common practice which I see done all over the place.

If you don't like it, Im sorry, but can we move on? Please? Im really not a rude person, it just seems that this is a trivial point.

 

Did I say that I was offended?

You are correct. I see a lot of things all over the place, but that does not make them acceptable. I do know that things become acceptable and common through use.

I really don't care if you capitalize all your letters. And it is a very trivial point.

If you want to bold letters, use Full Reply option, the Instant UBB Code "Bold".

This will not work on the instant reply, but you can insert the codes in instant reply.

I hope this is helpful for you and again forgive me for getting off topic.

 

Thank you. Thank you I see now.

 

bapmom,
Standards are good, but those standards are not determined by what you tell me they are. Please don't imply that I have no standards. And no one is telling me what legalsm is. You also are unaware of how much I know or study. You are also mistaken that I don't know what it is.

It is extra biblical man made rules that one Christian tries to impose on another through manipulation or a false sense of guilt. Read what you said, you contradict yourself. You said, "Having standards is one's own personal conviction." With that I agree, our own personal convictions. Having standards I also agree is not legalism. Pushing those standards on others is legalism. I know all too well the meaning of the word legalism and the results of it.

 

This is what Elnora said about herself. I must have overlooked where she called anyone in this thread a legalist.

 

She called me one, Thankful....and she called FBCPastorsWife one as well.

Elnora, than why do you use the word legalist when referring to me?

I never ever pushed my convictions on anyone else. According to Biblical principles there are Godly forms of music and unGodly forms. That was my only point.

Im not at your house with a gun requiring you to listen to my music. WOuldn't that be pushing it on you? How is simply stating my conviction about what the Bible teaches, in a public forum where the question was asked, how is that pushing it on you?

If I mention that I only wear dresses am I then pushing that standard on you, as well? No, Im just saying it. Pushing it on you would be if I went to your house and burned all your jeans (if you wear them).

Im not pushing anything on you. The question was asked for opinions and Biblical discussion on this matter. So why is it that the conservative view is considered "pushing a standard" but the more liberal view is, in your mind, just a matter of course and has every right to be expressed?

I think its because you agree with the latter view, and you seem to not like hearing anything you disagree with. Forgive me if this is wrong, but thats how you are coming across. You seem to be claiming Im pushing my own conviction on you, when all I was doing, (and FBCPastorsWife) was stating what we believe is a Biblical point of view.

 

Bapmom: //Again, please do not call me a legalist when you don't really understand what the word means. "legalism" means that the person is claiming that one must live a holy life in order to
a)get saved

or

b)remain saved

This is a heresy, of course.//

OF course, it is a heresy. It isn't what we
usually mean here by 'legalism'; it is only the worse form.
A less worse form is to give to much effort toward
rules and forgetting our relationship to Christ and to
one another.

Elnora: "I have been the legalistic route and it
produces nothing but self-righteousness and hypocrisy."

Amen, Sister Elnora -- right-on!

To whom was Sister Elnora speaking? To nobody in
particular. I don't think it was me. She was speaking
generically to minimize any offence given to others.
It is easier
for most of us not to mention their opponents by name
or 'you'. It helps to difuse the intra-personal conflict.

 

Thats fine EdEdwards, and thank you for the point.

But why is it that the question was asked then? If any dissenting view, any viewpoint that these sorts of songs are wrong, is met with the accusation of "legalism" than what is the point of asking?

 

And, Im sorry, but how is stating a conviction towards a certain type of music the same as putting too much emphasis on rules and ignoring one's walk with God?

I just don't see why the leap was necessary.

 

bapmom,
Why do you keep changing the subject? You have covered your take on everything from music to dresses, conservative to liberal, heathen to less heathen and more. Why are you calling me a liberal, and why are you accusing me of not know what a legalist is and why are you implying that someone is telling me what to think, that I don't study, that I have no standards?

Not that it is your business but I am not a liberal, I know my bible, I know what a legalist is and stated it plainly and you answer with dresses and a gun. Did I mention a gun now too?

I said by placing your convictions on others through manipulation and guilt. No gun mentioned here, certainly not dresses. Now if you truly believe what you stated, that it is a personal conviction. With that I can agree. The rest is to sidetrack what I did say and I don't appreciate it.

 

Bapmom

I guess your book is not big enough,

It just AIN'T LOUD ENOUGH.

TURN UP YOUR VOLUME.

They won't listen anyhow.

So what? All they want is a row.

So Bapmom, just YELL BACK AT THEM.

Some day they might listen to Him

Then Glory hallelujah they might just get Book.

Not by an embossing on their backside

but by a change on their inside.