You really need to come to gripes with your bad theology!Is the Church required to exercise discipline to its members who blatantly violate Mathew 5:48 & pretend to be in fellowship with God?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You really need to come to gripes with your bad theology!Is the Church required to exercise discipline to its members who blatantly violate Mathew 5:48 & pretend to be in fellowship with God?
So you also refuse to accept that the Lord Jesus commands his local church to exercise when proper and needed discipline among the members?We already know what God does with pharisee's hypocrite's like you. You claim you do not commit sin making God to be a Liar
1Jn_1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
1Jn 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1Jn 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
MB
My sins have been fully forgiven by God the Father, but I still need to confess and repent and forsake those sins convicted by the Holy Spirit of!Do confessions of sins make a person sinless that he no longer needs the grace given through Christ's atonement to have fellowship with God?
Would you agree with me also that those in spiritual leadership the OP spoke of, need to either get married to make it legit, or to stop living together?Your question does not make sense.
Three truths about forgivness of sins by the grace of God.
1. Full and the complete forgiveness, Hebrews 8:12.
2. The believer's sinless standing in Christ, not being under the Law, 2 Corinthians 5:21, 1 John 3:4, Romans 4:15, Romans 6:14, 1 John 3:6.
3. Practical forgivness and cleansing from sin, 1 John 1:9.
You're wrong I do believe we should live Holy lives but, no one is perfect in this life. When men begin to believe they are perfect they no longer need Christ. Christ didn't come to save the saved. They begin looking down their noses at other Christians. Judging them and thanking God they aren't like other men. They consider them selves perfect and sinless. There is only one man who is perfect and that is Jesus ChristSo you also refuse to accept that the Lord Jesus commands his local church to exercise when proper and needed discipline among the members?
Indeed, but we cannoit just excuse the sinning of those over us in spiritual authority though, correct?You're wrong I do believe we should live Holy lives but, no one is perfect in this life. When men begin to believe they are perfect they no longer need Christ. Christ didn't come to save the saved. They begin looking down their noses at other Christians. Judging them and thanking God they aren't like other men. They consider them selves perfect and sinless. There is only one man who is perfect and that is Jesus Christ
MB
OP:Would you agree with me also that those in spiritual leadership the OP spoke of, need to either get married to make it legit, or to stop living together?
@Yeshua1This is how I understand the Perseverance of the elect in the TULIP.
If I am one of the elect, then I will persevere [by the grace of God, not of my own power] in a life of holiness, never ending up in unrepentant sin but ever confessing my sins and seeking to walk with God, until the time of my death.
But I haven't reached the time of my death yet, so I still have the potential, if I am not in fact of the elect but only think I am, of ending up in unrepentant sin. If I do end up in such a state and die, then I find out, finally, that I wasn't one of the elect to begin with, which is why I did not persevere.
Therefore, even though I think I'm one of the elect based on the fact that I believe the gospel and seek to please God and to strive against sin and confess it, I can never be 100% sure that I am an elect, until I die in a state of perseverance.
Therefore in Calvinism, I can never have 100% assurance of salvation [I didn't say "eternal security", I said "assurance of salvation"].
Is my understanding correct? If not, please explain why not. Thanks
Confession is being forgiven of our sins. Paul died to sin daily. Dying to sin means he confessed his sins daily. There simply are no men with out sin because sin lives with in our flesh. Read Romans 6,7,8,Do confessions of sins make a person sinless that he no longer needs the grace given through Christ's atonement to have fellowship with God?
Jimmy Swaggert is not my concern That whole thing was between him and God My pastor admits that he is a sinner. Just as Paul admitted that he sinned. The only sinless pastor is Christ.Indeed, but we cannoit just excuse the sinning of those over us in spiritual authority though, correct?
was the Assemblies of God wrong to require Jimmy Swaggert to step down pastoring for a year and to do serious counseling before allowed back as senior pastor?
Don't you know that when a man and woman is joined together they are one flesh. Marriage is God's way. any other way becomes sin.Would you agree with me also that those in spiritual leadership the OP spoke of, need to either get married to make it legit, or to stop living together?
LOL, your digging a deep hole for yourself.This evolutionist false teacher promotes disobedience to Mathew 5:48 as constituting a testimony to Jesus!
When you have sex, you become married to that person. You become one. Government certification is irrelevant.Don't you know that when a man and woman is joined together they are one flesh. Marriage is God's way. any other way becomes sin.
MB
Thanks, think mixing my answers, should be in another thread!
was the AOG right to have him placed under spiritual "probationary" period?Jimmy Swaggert is not my concern That whole thing was between him and God My pastor admits that he is a sinner. Just as Paul admitted that he sinned. The only sinless pastor is Christ.
MB
Its called fornication, and should not be done, especially of the couple are leaders in a church!When you have sex, you become married to that person. You become one. Government certification is irrelevant.
That is my point, they need to get married or stop sinning that way as leaders!Don't you know that when a man and woman is joined together they are one flesh. Marriage is God's way. any other way becomes sin.
MB
The Bible says to confess your sin Swaggert did that. Why would you want him punished. If he hadn't confessed then they could not have legally proved he was in error. It takes two witnesses to prove such a charge. IMHO the man faced up yo it and admitted it. Does God punish the forgiven? No because they have repented. He has never recovered from it, we don't see him preaching anymore.was the AOG right to have him placed under spiritual "probationary" period?
1 Peter 1:5 among others.This is how I understand the Perseverance of the elect in the TULIP.
If I am one of the elect, then I will persevere [by the grace of God, not of my own power].
Hebrews 12:14.in a life of holiness,
Repentance is a salvation "essential".never ending up in unrepentant sin but ever confessing my sins and seeking to walk with God, until the time of my death.
All professing Christians have the potential of ending up in unrepentant sin.But I haven't reached the time of my death yet, so I still have the potential, if I am not in fact of the elect but only think I am, of ending up in unrepentant sin.
Any child of God can be sure of their salvation.Therefore, even though I think I'm one of the elect based on the fact that I believe the gospel and seek to please God and to strive against sin and confess it, I can never be 100% sure that I am an elect, until I die in a state of perseverance.
Regardless of anything that John Calvin may have taught, the BIBLE teaches that a person can have 100% assurance of salvation, by the statements made in 1 John 1:1 through 1 John 5:12.Therefore in Calvinism, I can never have 100% assurance of salvation [I didn't say "eternal security", I said "assurance of salvation"].
To me, what you've described regarding never being able to have assurance of one's salvation, is what the Puritans and the early "divines" believed...not born again children of the living God.Is my understanding correct? If not, please explain why not. Thanks