Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
And posts like "Your posts, however, are very divisive and unwarranted." help you with that goal of yours, how?
As I've told you in PM, you've made your point that you don't like the way I interact with you. As I told you in PM, I heard you....now move along.
Why don't you either respect my request and interact with me appropriately or hold it in?
Maybe you should run along.
Because I don't respect your request and don't feel I interact with you inappropriately. Your main objection is that I call you a liberal. I think you are a liberal. I'll continue to call you a liberal, so you might as well get used to it."
I grew up in the Southern Baptist tradition, before pursuing degrees in music and theology at Baylor University
So you would have no problem with a trans-gendered person working the front counter of your store? What about an open homosexual? Those are both quickly becoming cultural norms.
Now we know what happened to you! :laugh:
Nope. But I would not claim to be an Equal Opportunity Employer, either.
I do value freedom. Including the employees freedom to live within the cultural norms of society.
I believe you missed your calling. You should have been a trial lawyer.
Everywhere I have worked, I either did what I was told, which included things I could not say or I found another job.
But wait...you said, "I do value freedom. Including the employees freedom to live within the cultural norms of society."
What happened to the employees freedom? All of a sudden you don't value it anymore?
No, you are changing the rules. We were talking about constitutionality and legality. Now you are asking me about what I would personally do.
Second, the example you gave is one of lewdness. That is a different category. I support the right of a man to wear a shirt with Buddha on it. He does not have the right to wear a shirt with genitalia on it. You are confusing categories.
Everywhere I have worked, I either did what I was told, which included things I could not say or I found another job.
The store has a right, I think to post posters that say "Happy Holidays" rather than Merry Christmas. But when they instruct their employees not to say it, that is going to far. It is a national holiday.
Not long ago, there was a "native American" somewhere in south Texas who did not do that. He was in law enforcement and wanted to grow his hair longer than was allowed by the rules of the agency he worked for. He won his case and can wear his hair according to his tribal beliefs. Do you fault him for not doing as you say you would do?
Whoa, now.
I'm not by any stretch part of the PC police...but of course folks have the right to instruct their employees to say whatever holiday greeting they wish.
And other folks have the right to boycott.
First Amendment.
Good luck trying to prove in a court of law a mere greeting is a "religious belief or practice".Actually, according to the Equal Opportunity Employment commission, employers are required to make "reasonable accommodation" of religious beliefs and practices. If a person believed strongly that they should respond "Merry Christmas", how is that different from a Jewish man having the right to wear a Yarmulke, or a Muslim allowed prayer time?