And we see how those of faith, who had benefitted from the manifestation of God's love to them regardless of whether they were Jew or Gentile, which point stands as unanswered, and even agreed by you, yet you kick at this goad because the Word of God conflicts with your Theology System.
Or...you do not grasp what is being discussed and fail to realize that millions of Christians let scripture reveal to them the truth and theological system contained in it.
I grasp...
...all means all...
...men means men...
...and God so loved the world...
...as it is recorded in Scripture.
I also grasp the intent of the OP, the question of the OP, and the refusal of some to acknowledge a false premise to ratify false doctrine.
Shame, shame, shame on you, my friend.
There is no shame in believing God and His word.
I agree.
Which is why I tried to help you understand salvation Pre-Cross and Pre-Pentecost.
That is the singular error which both Calvinists and Arminians stumble over.
perhaps someday you will see that.
I already see it. But thanks for your concern, that is appreciated.
As that day has not come yet for you, you deny obvious portions of scripture and attack all who do not agree with your false views....we have seen this before DC.
Of course you have, because your Eschatology is as sloppy as your Soteriology and posting technique.
Why is it you refused to answer my question there. I let it slide, but have you forgotten that? If you ever did answer, perhaps you can show me where that answer can be found. It would be difficult, seeing there are some here who so disrupt threads, then run to another when the going gets tough. What, ten threads on the Rapture?
And you will see only responses, in detail, to those things which I see to be in error. Nothing more, nothing less.
Here is the redemption of Old Testament Saints which occurred after Christ died for them...not before. Until the Atonement guess what these folks relied on?
They relied on the faithfulness of God to his Covenant promise made to all who believe. Your responses avoid this totally as you are to bust being smug to think it out evidently.
Here is a little more smugness: we see God's love for the Children of Israel who the Writer of Hebrews makes clear were...
...unbelievers.
You are missing the fact that the Old Testament provision of manna, which Christ contrasts with the True Bread, Himself...
...was given to those who were unbelievers who perished in the Wilderness due to provocation.
Expand your knowledge base, m friend, and you will learn that the Love of God is directed to all men.
God's love which was bestowed upon the same world He loved enough to die for:
Since you enjoy Hebrews...heb 2:
16 For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.
And here we again see you are a novice in the Word of God.
You say...
opps..guess you missed it...or did not see it again....
Hebrews 9:14-15it does not say he took upon himself the seed of Adam..{world}..it says SEED of Abraham....that would be the ELECT..oh..the word is not there the theology is there however.
In fact this is precisely what the Writer is saying...that He took upon Himself the nature of men...not Angels, lol.
And again, expand your knowledge base and you will limit yourself to such erroneous statement and teaching:
John 8:38-40
King James Version (KJV)
38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.
39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.
Now you're trying to put the corrupted understanding of the Elect into Hebrews without realizing that not all who are of Israel are Elect.
For your information the Seed is Christ.
Not only is the word Elect not in this passage...not even the word seed is in this passage, which shows that you are incapable of dealing with the Word in it's context. Chapter two is not chapter nine, amigo.
Quote:
King James Version (KJV)
14 How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?
15 And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.
Every biblical verse dealing with the saved is dealing with the Elect given from the Father to the Son...
I would agree with that...but what does that have to do with what I said, the passage I quoted, and the OP?
I can snicker, as well, when posts like this are found to be more comical than theological.
And I am trying to close these posts with relevant Scripture to the OP (as well as
for the OP), so here is our closer on this one:
Titus 2:10-11
King James Version (KJV)
10 Not purloining, but shewing all good fidelity; that they may adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all things.
11 For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men,
All means all, men means men.
You will not deny, negate, nor nullify the love of God through your Theology System.
Continued...