Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I apologize. I was referring to a post by someone else regarding Cain and Abel.No, but this question is so out of the blue and over the top that I it makes me ask you to explain your thinking in asking it. I surely did not even hint that I believe such a ridiculous thing. I did not mention Cain or Abel or even hint at these people or at your suggested impossibility. I mentioned a prophecy concerning the seed of the woman who is Jesus Christ from Gen 3:15.
I must tell you that my head went into the spin mode big time when I saw that question.
so thank you in advance for explaining yourself.
Thanks. That helps me understand your viewpoint.That's a fair question. I suppose you have in mind the Niceno-Constantinopolitan amended form of the creed.
View attachment 7239
The creed is mistaken when it states "begotten of the Father before all worlds".
Christ the Word proceeded from God "before all worlds", of course, but Christ the Son is a reference to his body. Jesus is the incarnational Son of God, by definition. Christ is eternal as the Word, not as the Son. As the Word he is God, as the Son he is man.
The creed actually contradicts its own statement right after as it unwittingly corrects itself when declaring "and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary"...exactly, "was incarnate" is the "begotten" part, again, by definition.
Of course, the creed is wrong on other points such as:
1) describing Mary as "The Virgin", a titular RCC description foreign to the word of God where she is simply a virgin and which did not remain one.
2) apparently positing a single future resurrection and judgment when the scriptures reveal more than one resurrection and judgment
3) implying that the remission of sins is by water baptism, which is definitely not true during the church-age.
How many off topic posts does it take to derail a thread? If a KJVO argument for "only begotten" is allowed to destroy any discussion of John 3:16, how can we edify those seeking truth?
4) "Only begotten" is a mistranslation of "monogenes" and should be translated "one of a kind" or "uniquely divine." Jesus is not God's only Son, as Adam was also the son of God, and every born anew believer is also a child of God. However Jesus was one of a kind, uniquely divine, God incarnate.
Why post out and out falsehoods?I don't know why you oppose the fact that Jesus Christ is the virgin born son of God SNIP
.
Perhaps “world” is making the point God’s love in giving His Son was not limited to the Jewish people only, but included Gentiles.
Why post out and out falsehoods?
Here is my posted on this thread position:
The Greek word, transliterated as "Monogenes" literally means "one of a kind." What makes Jesus the "one of a kind" uniquely divine Son when there are other sons of God such as Adam and every born anew believer?
Jesus is uniquely divine in these and other ways:
1) God incarnate -
John 1:14: And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us; and we saw His glory, glory as of the uniquely divine Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.
2) God with us -
Matthew 1:23: "“BEHOLD, THE VIRGIN WILL CONCEIVE AND GIVE BIRTH TO A SON, AND THEY SHALL NAME HIM IMMANUEL,” which translated means, “GOD WITH US.”
3) Virgin birth -
Matthew 1:23: “BEHOLD, THE VIRGIN WILL CONCEIVE AND GIVE BIRTH TO A SON, AND THEY SHALL NAME HIM IMMANUEL,” which translated means, “GOD WITH US.”
4) Holy One of God -
Mark 1:24: saying, “What ]business do you have with us, Jesus ]of Nazareth? Have You come to destroy us? I know who You are: the Holy One of God!”
5) Jesus is the only way to God -
John 14:6: Jesus *said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father except through Me.
μονογενής monogenes is being translated "only begotten" in English because the Latin tradition. Not because of His incarnation. John 1:18.The operative idea is that he is the only "begotten" son of God in the flesh.
Ok, All the writers of scripture had particular audiences in mind. John wrote after the destruction of the Temple in AD 70, and by that time the Christian church was well established to have a large gentile fellowship.???
20 Jesus answered him, I have spoken openly to the world; I ever taught in synagogues, and in the temple, where all the Jews come together; and in secret spake I nothing. Jn 18
Compare:
24 ....I was not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Mt 15
With:
20 ...I have spoken openly to the world....Jn 18
μονογενής monogenes is being translated "only begotten" in English because the Latin tradition. Not because of His incarnation. John 1:18.
Which subject?Is that the final word on the subject?
μονογενήςμονογενής monogenes is being translated "only begotten" in English because the Latin tradition. Not because of His incarnation. John 1:18.
Did you misrepresent my view? YesI responded to point #4 in your op. SNIP.
Your translation of John 3:16 is driven by your obsession with something God never teaches in the Bible. God does not save based upon the merited faith of an unsaved person.God loved humanity in this way, He gave His uniquely divine Son so that everyone credited with righteous faith in Christ will not perish but have everlasting life.
The above interpretative translation of John 3:16 has been rejected by some posters on the following basis:
1) The Greek word transliterated "kosmos" refers to only the elect in this verse. However God desires all people to be saved and Christ laid down His life as a ransom for all. Therefore humanity or fallen humanity better conveys God's actual message.
2) The Greek word transliterated "monogenes" refers to Christ as His "only begotten." However every born anew believer was born, thus Christ is not the only begotten. Such a translation is a corruption.
3) The Greek word transliterated "eis" means "in" or "on" rather than referring to God crediting the person's faith as righteous faith and transferring the individual spiritually into Christ. However it is very unlikely God would bestow blessings because He did not credit someone's faith.
Yet another personal incredulity post, devoid of any biblical support. No one said our faith merited being credited as righteous faith or salvation, that is your disinformation claim.Your translation of John 3:16 is driven by your obsession with something God never teaches in the Bible. God does not save based upon the merited faith of an unsaved person.
Van, you declare that with every post.Yet another personal incredulity post, devoid of any biblical support. No one said our faith merited being credited as righteous faith or salvation, that is your disinformation claim.
Van, you declare that with every post.
You demand that a person have faith before salvation, which God would then decide whether to credit that faith as righteous or not righteous.
Van, that is merit based salvation no matter how you parse it.
I have read the scriptures. I see that God makes a man alive, even while they are dead in sins. I see that upon being made alive, that person is given faith to believe. How is it that you are unaware of Ephesians 1 and Ephesians 2, as well as Romans 8 and Romans 9, plus John 6, John 10, and John 17, not to mention John 3,etc, etc.?Haven't you ever read the scriptures? If your answer is yes and you do not understand words any better than you demonstrate here, I suggest you get your money back from your English teacher.
If a man does not believe the gospel of Jesus Christ, then he cannot be saved from the penalty of his sin, which is the second death in the lake of fire, where he is forgotten of God for all eternity.
John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
If a man says he cannot believe, then he makes God a liar.
Acts 16:29 Then he called for a light, and sprang in, and came trembling, and fell down before Paul and Silas,
30 And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved?
31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
How you fellows day after day continue to deny this fundamental truth, saying faith is a work when God makes it as plain as daylight that he does not think it is but is a requirement of God for salvation, but according to you, sinners cannot do what God requires is like admitting you can't process words logically.