Brief history.
New guy makes inane remark about “assault” weapons. Using quote function I ask him what an “assault weapon” is. Question goes ignored.
Definition of assault weapon
: any of various automatic or semiautomatic firearms; especially : assault rifle https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/assault weapon
New guy makes claim that US foreign policy has killed as many as abortion has. Using quote function I ask him to back this up. Question goes unanswered.
If you consider the wars of aggression launched by the US, especially by the Neo-Conservatives based on lies, WMDs etc. the numbers killed rival or exceed those they also kill by abortion.
New guy frames questions the same way banned guy did. New guy does not discuss theology, he repeats mantras. Just like banned guy did.
If I cannot back what I say from the bible, it is opinion, and I always discipline myself to keep the two separate.
New guy claims total pacifism even the the most gruesome cases and claims others are carnal for not doing likewise. Just like banned guy.
If you can back your views on violence from the NT, I would welcome them and possibly embrace them.
New guy sidesteps the question of if he is banned guy or not.
I am not CrabtownBoy. But would like to read his posts to see what you are talking about.
I was not the only one who thinks this bit I am the only one who says it.
Free Speech is the greatest defence we have. But sometimes others stifle it.
His foot will slide in due time.....
I always pray before I post asking God for wisdom and that he would be glorified in what I say.