:applause:
:thumbs::thumbs::applause:
Are you speaking "gospelly" or eternally? ;-)
:thumbs::thumbs::applause:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Are you speaking "gospelly" or eternally? ;-)
let me ask you a question here. "provider of salvation"?
Do you mean He makes salvation possible...but does not save?
or He provides salvation because He ACTUALLY saves?
This really is the crux of the discussion, isn't it?
To rephrase the question to make it more broad:
Does the life, death, and resurrection of Christ (1) Make salvation possible for everyone or (2) Accomplish salvation for His people?The conundrum with #1 is that if Christ's death merely makes salvation possible, His death actually accomplishes nothing...
Blessings,
The Archangel
Yes.
The language of an accomplished redemption is found in Hebrews 7-10.....
To suggest that Jesus only makes possible.....but does not save ....is not found anywhere.
This really is the crux of the discussion, isn't it?
To rephrase the question to make it more broad:
Does the life, death, and resurrection of Christ (1) Make salvation possible for everyone or (2) Accomplish salvation for His people?[/COLOR]The conundrum with #1 is that if Christ's death merely makes salvation possible, His death actually accomplishes nothing...
Blessings,
The Archangel
Archangel, that was always one of the issues that bothered me for years...one that I had trouble with as a RC long before I thought to become an Arminian (that and General Universal Atonement)....I just didnt see it.
However the issue of placing babies that die before having any biblical means to save them was equally disconcerting. Then lastly, absolute predestination (the just making us puppets) thing never sits well with me.
This is correct, and is consistent with partial open theism.God is not responsible for mans sin.
This is not the view of Calvinism, where all fallen persons have no ability to repent, seek God or trust in Christ. They can choose which sin to commitment, but cannot choose not to sin according to the mistaken doctrine of Calvinism. Think of it this way, would it make sense to hold a person underwater, then blame the one held under for drowning.we are told in Scripture that men love darkness rather than light because their deeds are evil it's the love of sin that sinners have that keeps them from repenting and believing in the gospel .
Again no verse or passage says this, but Calvinism claims it is so.They are also blinded by Satan so God has to supernaturally overcome satan
No verse says "all fallen men" never at any time want to repent, seek God, and truth in Christ. The opposite is found in scripture, see Matthew 23:13, where fallen mean are seeking God, actually entering heaven, until blocked by false teachers.that all men are commanded to repent and believe the gospel but they don't want to.
This is true, but not what Calvinism claims.God is not stopping them from repenting .
Again, if you are being held underwater, and finally you breath in the water and drown, you can say the one holding did not make the person breath in the water. You can say it, but it is absurd.God is not making them sin.
Real calvinism does not hold to absolute predestination though, and many also would hold that babies are all saved by grace of God...
What are you basing that off of?
.Van This is correct said:is consistent with partial open theism
This is not the view of Calvinism, where all fallen persons have no ability to repent, seek God or trust in Christ. They can choose which sin to commitment, but cannot choose not to sin
Again no verse or passage says this, but Calvinism claims it is so.
No verse says "all fallen men" never at any time want to repent, seek God, and truth in Christ.
that all men are commanded to repent and believe the gospel but they don't want to.
God is not stopping them from repenting .
God is not making them sin.
they sin because they love the sin that they do.
Icon, I apparently missed this post earlier, but I'm curious...
From what I've gleaned from Calvinists, man is only capable of repenting if God supplies them grace to repent. If God does not give them grace, then they simply cannot come to repentance. If that is true, then is it not logical to say that God is stopping them from repenting?
I agree that God does not make them sin, but it seems like this particular theology is picking and choosing when man has the ability and the freedom to do certain things.
God is not responsible for man's sins.
Van said:This is correct, and is consistent with partial open theism.
Here Calvinism presents absurdity with a straight face. According to Calvinism God predestines "whatsoever comes to pass" which includes our sins, yet then says God is not responsible for the sin's of men He predestined. Twaddle times two.Icon said:Any form of open theism is rejected as non biblical doctrine.
Icon said:we are told in Scripture that men love darkness rather than light because their deeds are evil it's the love of sin that sinners have that keeps them from repenting and believing in the gospel
Van said:This is not the view of Calvinism, where all fallen persons have no ability to repent, seek God or trust in Christ. They can choose which sin to commit, but cannot choose not to sin according to the mistaken doctrine of Calvinism. Think of it this way, would it make sense to hold a person underwater, then blame the one held under for drowning.
Here again we have the denial of Calvinism's doctrine of "Total Spiritual Inability" where instead of saying they cannot turn to God (repent) and believe because they have no ability, the mistaken assertion is presented in code, ie. " it's the love of sin that sinners have that keeps them from repenting and believing in the gospel...." No verse says every fallen person never seeks God at any time, because Matthew 23:13 says some do!Icon said:Yes it is the view of Calvinism
Icon said:They are also blinded by Satan so God has to supernaturally overcome Satan
In response to this, Icon cited 2 Corinthians 4:4 which reads (NASB)Van said:Again no verse or passage says this, but Calvinism claims it is so.
let's see why you are known as the T.M.-Twaddle times two.
.Here Calvinism presents absurdity with a straight face. According to Calvinism God predestines "whatsoever comes to pass" which includes our sins, yet then says God is not responsible for the sin's of men He predestined
Here again we have the denial of Calvinism's doctrine of "Total Spiritual Inability" where instead of saying they cannot turn to God (repent) and believe because they have no ability, the mistaken assertion is presented in code, ie. " it's the love of sin that sinners have that keeps them from repenting and believing in the gospel...."
,In response to this, Icon cited 2 Corinthians 4:4 which reads (NASB)in whose case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.Note, Satan, "the god of this world" has blinded some men but not all men
"those who are perishing." Why did Satan need to blind them, if from conception they were totally blind, having "Total Spiritual Inability?" So the very verse cited in support of the mistaken assertions of Calvinism, actually refutes Total Spiritual Inability.
In you look at the prior verse (2 Cor. 4:3) you will see the gospel is not veiled to all men but only to those who are perishing
Here Calvinism presents absurdity with a straight face. According to Calvinism God predestines "whatsoever comes to pass" which includes our sins, yet then says God is not responsible for the sin's of men He predestined. Twaddle times two.
Here again we have the denial of Calvinism's doctrine of "Total Spiritual Inability" where instead of saying they cannot turn to God (repent) and believe because they have no ability, the mistaken assertion is presented in code, ie. " it's the love of sin that sinners have that keeps them from repenting and believing in the gospel...." No verse says every fallen person never seeks God at any time, because Matthew 23:13 says some do!
In response to this, Icon cited 2 Corinthians 4:4 which reads (NASB)in whose case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.Note, Satan, "the god of this world" has blinded some men but not all men, "those who are perishing." Why did Satan need to blind them, if from conception they were totally blind, having "Total Spiritual Inability?" So the very verse cited in support of the mistaken assertions of Calvinism, actually refutes Total Spiritual Inability.
In you look at the prior verse (2 Cor. 4:3) you will see the gospel is not veiled to all men but only to those who are perishing (i.e. the first soil of Matthew 13). So by the numbers1) All men are not conceived with total spiritual inability.
2) Some men are hardened by the god of this world, such that they are blinded to the gospel.
3) No verse says all men are totally blinded at conception due to the fall, and therefore again no verse says God must "supernaturally" overcome Satan's blinding of all men.
Next, in supposed support of "Total Spiritual Inability" two more verses are cited, Palms 14:1-3 and Romans 3:11, which says (NASB) "there is none who seek righteousness." It does not say there is none who seek righteousness "at any time" which is the Calvinist addition to the text to alter its meaning. In the context of Romans 3, Paul is demonstrating from scripture that "all men are under sin." We, as fallen men, are all unrighteous. We do not seek God all the time, but we have all turned aside into sin and because we are sinners, we are useless, all our works of righteousness are as filthy rags. We have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
So again, the verses cited do not support total spiritual inability, but rather it supports we cannot save ourselves but need to believe in Christ for salvation.
Icon, I apparently missed this post earlier, but I'm curious...
From what I've gleaned from Calvinists, man is only capable of repenting if God supplies them grace to repent. If God does not give them grace, then they simply cannot come to repentance. If that is true, then is it not logical to say that God is stopping them from repenting?
I agree that God does not make them sin, but it seems like this particular theology is picking and choosing when man has the ability and the freedom to do certain things.
I'm not Brother Iconoclast, but I'd like to chime in here...
To bring this to it's simplest terms, all the human race lost their righteousness, their "right standing" before God when Adam fell. All that was lost in Adam, was restored in Christ. Myriads of people dying lost shows that what Christ did was not for all sinners, but the elect only.
Here again we have the denial of Calvinism's doctrine of "Total Spiritual Inability" where instead of saying they cannot turn to God (repent) and believe because they have no ability, the mistaken assertion is presented in code, ie. " it's the love of sin that sinners have that keeps them from repenting and believing in the gospel...." No verse says every fallen person never seeks God at any time, because Matthew 23:13 says some do!