• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

PARABLES

Precepts

New Member
Here is my commitment. If you begin to behave like a Christian (loving the brethren, et al.) then I would like to continue interacting with you occasionally. If your testimony is going to continue to belie your claims about preaching the gospel and loving other Christians then I will not give you an occasion to continue in these sins.
You quoted from your "version" of what you think to be love, but you have never shown that towards me and I really don't care if you ever do, it doesn't change the fact that I love you unconditionally.

You tell me when I CALLED you a liar?

You have presumed much about me that you have absolutely no way of knowing what you are talking about. You have appointed yourself a judge over my being and are guilty of such. You have judged my Christian character, but have never met me. I will there fore give you the chance to reconcile your indifference to me or I will simply have to ignore you

Good Day
 

Precepts

New Member
Originally posted by Johnv:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by QuickeningSpirit:
but we have the Word of God in the Holy Bible, the AV 1611 KJB.
The KJV is no more or less the word of God than any other translation. </font>[/QUOTE]That's debatable. especially when I am already settled on the AV 1611 KJB. Now, is that some sort of un-Christian charity towards you or anyone else? No. I just take a stand you don't have. I've read other versions and I see where your type tries to use the Greek to dishearten and tear down another's faith in God. Sorry, your attempts are less than futile.
 

Precepts

New Member
Ah but you see, you can't avoid this question no matter how hard you try. When this world and all it's works pass through fire and are replaced with a new Heavens and a new earth and the precious corporeal KJB you worship no longer exists, will God's Word still be perfectly preserved? If so how and why?
Listen, you're attitude towards me is quite presumptuous. I haven't avoided your question and your presumptuous attitude that the Word of God is forever settled in Heaven and not realizing it is written upon the tables of our hearts only proves your lack of understanding. The Word of God abideth ever, whether you like it or not. God has always had a remnant, and that remanant has been determined to preserve His Word.

I have poked and prodded at your type and been accused of hating my brethren. I have shown your type truth and then told I wasn't answering your demands.

Maybe your motive is to try and prove yourself superior in intellect and knowledge, but I see through that and your knowledge is corrupt, if that isn't the case, then at the very least your acknowledgement of what I have told you is in error.

When heaven and earth pass away the Word of God abideth still, but guess what? Ever since man has been created, God has preserved certain few and His Word is preserved still, whether you like it or NOT.

Good Day
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
You have presumed much about me that you have absolutely no way of knowing what you are talking about. You have appointed yourself a judge over my being and are guilty of such. You have judged my Christian character, but have never met me.
Truly, QS, this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. Why are you so offended that you perceive that others are doing to you what you have done — repeatedly?

I can provide the quotes, including one about reporting someone to the Homeland Security Agency. Oh, right. That had a smiley, so it was just a joke.
 

tinytim

<img src =/tim2.jpg>
That's the problem, You have made yourself the authority. God settled on his word, THAT's Authourity. You settled on a version before you got to meet truth.

BTW, you say,"You quoted from your "version" of what you think to be love"

No he quoted correctly from the HOLY BIBLE!

In 2004, *love* is the attitude behind *charity*
 

Orvie

New Member
Example of qs type "humour"- You dirty rotten anti KJV Bible correcting whateverist Bible of the month club! You bunch of pansies who hate God's True Word: KJB1611! and now to make everything alright, qs adds a.....
laugh.gif
or :D or ;) and my answer to qs: :rolleyes:
 

Precepts

New Member
It means that we don't know the etymology of the word - but we do know what it means. That's exactly what the dictionary says.
O.K., You understand the Greek word "dakruo", I understand the context of John 11. You say I don't understand the Greek, but I have 3 lexicons that show me the very same definition of "dakruo" and you agree, but then I show you that the word is from "dakru". Dakruo means to shed tears, dakru means tear. The concept of dakruo is to shed tears sliently, I agree, but the context over-rules that meaning and calls for further definiiton. W look into the synonyms to find they mean the same but with an added meaning of to wail. You come up with the other Greek word that does measn to wail, but that doesn't explain the context, so you abide by the definition of dakruo and I remain in agreement with the context. I understand why Jesus wept, you understand the defintion of dakruo. I show you the reason for Jesus to weep
is the unbelief that will send His own to hell for failing to see Him as the Ressurrection, you see the defintion of the Greek word dakruo. I even asked a fifteen year old boy the meaning of John 11 and why Jesus wept, he said because of the doubts and unbelief of the people even though Jesus would raise Lazarus from certain death, you see the defintion of the word dakruo to mean shedding silent tears. I understand why Jesus wept, you understand how He wept, but your understanding is contrary to the context.


In correalation to Luke 16:31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead. Here we have the same idea of some one being raised from the dead and yet there are those who die and go to hell because of the unbelief of the Ressurrection of the dead and Jesus being Him.

The identical context is given due to the
unbelief ofthe rich man why he
was in torments in hell, where there is weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth. The indentical level of emotion due to unbelief is expressed. Again I understand why and you say you understand Greek. I don't believeyour understanding is exactly correct for every application and you will never convince me because I understand why and you understand the singular definition of a Greek word when the entire time the context never agrees with the defintion you give or anyone else has given. We are left with the alternative to conclude that the word dakruo is not by mistake, but the root word dakru has synonyms that give further detail to defintion than you are willing to understand and thereby you fail in your defintion. You have said time and time again I don't understand, but when I consider all the facts, I am left with the understanding it is you that doesn't understand. Sorry, but that's just taters and beans.

Good day
 

Precepts

New Member
Originally posted by rsr:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />You have presumed much about me that you have absolutely no way of knowing what you are talking about. You have appointed yourself a judge over my being and are guilty of such. You have judged my Christian character, but have never met me.
Truly, QS, this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. Why are you so offended that you perceive that others are doing to you what you have done — repeatedly?

I can provide the quotes, including one about reporting someone to the Homeland Security Agency. Oh, right. That had a smiley, so it was just a joke.
</font>[/QUOTE]Another supreme court justice
 

Precepts

New Member
Originally posted by tinytim:
That's the problem, You have made yourself the authority. God settled on his word, THAT's Authourity. You settled on a version before you got to meet truth.

BTW, you say,"You quoted from your "version" of what you think to be love"

No he quoted correctly from the HOLY BIBLE!

In 2004, *love* is the attitude behind *charity*
Sorry, tiny, you no nothing about Holy. Check out the thread on I Peter 2:2, if you consider the niv the Holy Bibly then you're just plain ignorant to holiness
 

Precepts

New Member
Originally posted by Orvie:
Example of qs type "humour"- You dirty rotten anti KJV Bible correcting whateverist Bible of the month club! You bunch of pansies who hate God's True Word: KJB1611! and now to make everything alright, qs adds a.....
laugh.gif
or :D or ;) and my answer to qs: :rolleyes:
You perjure yourself if this is supposed to be a quote attributed to me. There may be some similaritites, but I never said all those, but you can check with the scribe to be certain.
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
QS said:

You perjure yourself if this is supposed to be a quote attributed to me. but you can check with the scribe to be certain. There may be some similaritites, but I never said all those,
Type, I think, was the operative word.

QS QUOTES
 

Precepts

New Member
Originally posted by rsr:
QS said:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />You perjure yourself if this is supposed to be a quote attributed to me. but you can check with the scribe to be certain. There may be some similaritites, but I never said all those,
Type, I think, was the operative word.

QS QUOTES
</font>[/QUOTE]Man, you really got some incriminating evidence on ol' QuickeningSpirit there, maybe you should present it to the district attorney and recommend he be nailed to a cross or somethin'! Travelsong can hold the nails while you and Orvie swing the hammer. :rolleyes: Oh, better call JohnV I'm sure he has some railing accustaions to make too.
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
No accusations; just what you said.

No district attorney; as a Baptist, I have no wish to involve the state in theology.
 

tinytim

<img src =/tim2.jpg>
Originally posted by rsr:
QS said:

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />You perjure yourself if this is supposed to be a quote attributed to me. but you can check with the scribe to be certain. There may be some similaritites, but I never said all those,
Type, I think, was the operative word.

QS QUOTES
</font>[/QUOTE]That's ok KJVO don't even understand the word "as" in ps 12:6

It's called comparison, QS.
Anyone with a little inteligence could figure out he wasn't quoting you.
But it did sound like something you could have said.
 

tinytim

<img src =/tim2.jpg>
Originally posted by QuickeningSpirit:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by tinytim:
That's the problem, You have made yourself the authority. God settled on his word, THAT's Authourity. You settled on a version before you got to meet truth.

BTW, you say,"You quoted from your "version" of what you think to be love"

No he quoted correctly from the HOLY BIBLE!

In 2004, *love* is the attitude behind *charity*
Sorry, tiny, you no nothing about Holy. Check out the thread on I Peter 2:2, if you consider the niv the Holy Bibly then you're just plain ignorant to holiness </font>[/QUOTE]I guess when it comes to holiness there are a few things I don't know.
I'M NOT GOD!
And BTW I do consider any faithful translation to be the Holy Bible. Not just one 400 yrs old.


Oh no, Longer Abbreviations!
NIVHB, NASHB, NLTHB, NKJVHB, etc.
 

Precepts

New Member
Originally posted by rsr:
No accusations; just what you said.

No district attorney; as a Baptist, I have no wish to involve the state in theology.
No. But you would violate 1 Corinthians 6:1 Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
"Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?"

That's what I'm doing; you're the one who accused me otherwise.
 
Top