1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Pre-trib rapture

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by dwmoeller1, Mar 8, 2007.

  1. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
     
    #61 skypair, Mar 14, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 14, 2007
  2. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, Brother Skypair -- you are so RIGHT ON! :thumbs:
     
  3. EdSutton

    EdSutton New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm another Ed (Two Eds are maybe better than one, as t'other one said once?) but I'll offer a suggestion on how one 'divides' Matt. 24, into four 'splits' from the Scripture. We'll use four words/phrases found there, four "t"s actually. Remember the disciples asked Jesus three questions, which I will also cite (my emphases).
    I underlined the (or at least most of the) "then(s)" and some "and(s)" in the passage to show the progression that the passage entails. Jesus does not, certainly, give all-encompassing details of all future events, but does give a basic outline, IMO. FTR, I see verses 30 and 31 as continuing the progression, after the tribulation.

    In v. 32 and 33, however, Jesus injects an object lesson with a parable, vs. continuing the progression, so far. He is asking, in effect, "Do you get it? Here is how you can know."

    Ed
     
    #63 EdSutton, Mar 14, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 14, 2007
  4. dwmoeller1

    dwmoeller1 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    0
    I totally agree. However, this isn't in answer to my question. How do you determine the split based on context. I Thes 4 is not within the context of Matt 24.

    Again, how do you determine that the split occurs at this place contextually?

    Ahh...finally a contextual basis.

    First of all, 'kai' is not a polysendton. A polysendton is the repeated use of a conjunction like 'kai' in close succession (specifically, where some might be omitted).

    Secondly, a polysendton connects, not seperates. A polysendton is conjuctive. You seem to be turning a conjuctive into a place of disjunction.

    Thirdly, while 'kai' is present at the beginning of vs 31, it is not being used as a polysendton (see above definition).

    So,
    1. Your definition is incorrect
    2. You turn the use of 'kai' on its head
    3. There isn't even a polysendton present as you claim.

    So, maybe you can clarify what you meant to argue, because as it stands its both inaccurate and contrary to fact.
     
  5. dwmoeller1

    dwmoeller1 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  6. dwmoeller1

    dwmoeller1 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    0
    No disagreements there. But now I am curious, what 'side' is your argument intended to support?

    How you can know what?
     
  7. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  8. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dwmoeller1: //Again, how do you determine that the split occurs at this place contextually?//

    If context means Matthew 24:4-44 then the context doesn't
    indicate a split there.

    If context means Gen 1:1 to Rev 22:21,
    then I've answered the question.

    Whomever: //You are NOT Israel! Israel has 4 unconditional covenants with God (Abrahamic, Palestinian, Davidic, New) by which promised on His own Name that He would revive physically and spiritually and give them the land of Israel and rule over the world.

    Dwmoeller1: //Since its not really the subject, I shall
    merely refer you to Rom 9:6-8, and gal 3:29.//

    Ah, but it is the subject. God's plan to redeem all the Jews
    involves both the Church and the Pretribulation rapture/resurrection
    of it as well as the 7-year-Tribulation period.

    Speaking of Romans 9:6-8, here it is in the KJV1769 Edition:
    Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect.
    For they are not all Israel which are of Israel:
    7 Neither because they are the seed of Abraham
    are they all children: but in Isaac shall thy seed be called.
    8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh,
    these are not the children of God: but the children
    of the promise are counted for the seed.


    I'll get back with you all on the pretribulation chapter of Romans:
    Romans 11 -- well God willin' and if the crick don't rise.
     
  9. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you, Ed. I wasn't ignoring your post earlier either -- it was, rather, my inspiration. :D

    To me, Calvinism and anti-dispensationalism go hand-in-hand. I'm betting I don't get an answer as to what the future of Israel is out of dw. :D If he had to admit it, he'd also have to look for a pretrib rapture.

    skypair
     
  10. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dwmoeller1 to EdSutton: //But now I am curious,
    what 'side' is your argument intended to support?//

    Sutton's Doctrine of Eschatology.

    Did anybody ever remind us of the Baptist Distinctives?

    Here they are
    (picked up somewhere else, I didn't make it up):

    * Biblical authority
    * Autonomy of the local church
    * Priesthood of all believers
    * Two ordinances (baptism and communion)
    * Individual soul liberty
    * Separation of Church and State
    * Two offices of the church (pastor and deacon)

    The two bolded bolded distinctives mean in this matter:
    Each Baptist individual who is competent has to figure
    out their own eschatology.

    I like the guy who says he is a 'Pan-millinnialist' --
    Jesus is in charge and the future will pan out just as
    God intended.
     
  11. dwmoeller1

    dwmoeller1 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  12. dwmoeller1

    dwmoeller1 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok...glad we got that settled. Let me repeat it - there is no contextual reason to see a split where you do.

    Context never means such a broad range of materials, writers, historical time periods, concepts, etc. Context always referring to the immediate vicinity of a passage - either its immediate vicinity in time (historical context) or it immediate vicinity in the text (textual context). Context would certainly never be seen as extending beyond a certain book of the Bible. Don't believe me - go ask a expert on interpretation.

    On the basis of established rules of interpretation, one must first seek to understand what is being said in the immediate context before one seeks to bring other passage into play. Yes, Scripture interepts Scripture, but the Scripture which is most significant in helping interpret a passage is the Scripture immediately surrounding (ie. the context) the passage.

    So is this your starting point of reasoning?
     
    #72 dwmoeller1, Mar 14, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 14, 2007
  13. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dwmoeller1: //First of all, 'kai' is not a polysendton.
    A polysendton is the repeated use
    of a conjunction like 'kai' in close succession
    (specifically, where some might be omitted).//

    That is one definition of polysyndton, but not the only
    definition of 'polysyndton'.

    I used to wonder why in Chapter one of Genesis nerarly every
    verse started with 'And'. My 4th grade teacher taught me
    "Never start a sentence with 'and'."

    IMHO in the Greek of Matthew 24 'and' is used frequently
    instead of (as in Microsoft) Bullets.

    Dwmoeller1:
    Three strikes and you are out.

    Yep, the difference between post-trib and pre-trib
    hinges on the meaning of 'and' in Matthew 24:31.

    The difference between post-trib and pre-trib
    hinges on the meaning of 'and' in 2 Thess 2:1

    The difference between post-trib and pre-trib
    hinges on the meaning of '&' in Revelation 20:4

    The difference between Aminianistic hope on the one hand
    and Calvinistic dispar on the other hand depends
    on what 'and' means.

    I find it totally amasing that most post-tribs
    are anti-OSAS and most pre-tribs are pro-OSAS??

    OSAS = once saved, always saved, AKA: security
    of the believer, AKA: preservation of the saints
     
  14. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dwmoeller1: //Where in Scripture is the rapture referred to as a mystery?//

    Ah, I have that in my yet unposted 'Mysteries of the Faith'
    prove pre-trib:

    ----------------------
    ...
    3. Mystery of the Rapture

    1 Chrinthians 15:51a (NIV):
    Listen, I tell you a mystery: We will not all sleep,
    but we will all be changed
    -- ...

    1 Thessalonians 4:14,16

    Titus 2:13 (nKJV):
    looking for the blessed hope and
    glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jeus
    Christ


    Of course, such a rapture must be
    the pretrib rapture/resurrection
    when 100s of millions of saints are still alive,
    not the post-trib rapture/resurrection,
    for after the tribulation there will only be a few
    handfuls of living saints, maybe a couple of
    thousand..
    ...
    ----------------------
     
  15. dwmoeller1

    dwmoeller1 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    0
    The mystery stated here is explicity 'we will not all sleep, but we all shall be changed'. IOW, the passage states very clearly what the mystery is - the transformation to glorified bodies. That is the mystery.

    Now, does this take place at the rapture? Yes. BUT, the passage does not say that the rapture itself is a mystery - merely that one aspect of the rapture is a mystery.

    Like I keep saying: What does Scripture *SAY*. In this pasage it says that the transformation is a mystery, it does not say that the rapture (or its timing) is a mystery.

    And this passage says nothing at all about any mystery.

    So I ask again: What passage speaks of the rapture as being a mystery?
     
  16. dwmoeller1

    dwmoeller1 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok. Please refer me to a source which gives a different definition.

    That English grammar which is largely based on Latin grammar, not greek. Syntax and grammar in the greek doesn't follow those rules. Don't apply English rules to greek. Now, refer me to source which says that this is unusual or 'incorrect' grammar in the greek and I will consider your reasoning more carefully.

    What are your credentials in the understanding of greek syntax and grammar? Are there other Scripture examples where this is the case?

    Without that, I am sorry but I have little reason to accept YHO as valid. I could just as well say "IMHO, there is water on the moon." There might be and there might not be, but regardless MO on the matter, no matter how H it may be, is not worth much.

    While I await your referring me to a source which shows that my definition of polysendton is limited, we will set this aside.
     
  17. EdSutton

    EdSutton New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not particularly intending to support any "side", per se, just showing the fairly obvious divisions in the chapter we are discussing.
    That is not a quote, nevertheless you are kidding, right? Read the verse without any pre-conceived agenda, and the next verse, where Jesus says -
    Just as you know that summer is approaching when the fig tree sprouts, you will know that Jesus is Coming © "when you see all these things". What things? Obviously the things he has just been taklking about. And when this occurs, it is very near, "even at the doors!"

    Ed
     
  18. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    look at post #62 on this page:

    http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=670602

    .

    See also post #63:

    --------------------
    Regarding "day" in 2 Peter 3:10.

    in my dictionary:
    "7. a time considered as
    propitious or opportune"

    So i believe the day of the Lord
    to be the appropriate time that
    our blessed Lord and Savior,
    Messiah Jesus will once again
    interfere in the affairs of mankind.

    In the early 60s (i was 21 so an adult
    in 1964) Russia and the USA finaly had
    enough nuclear weapons to kill all
    humans on earth and possibly all life
    on earth. Someone surely needs to
    interfere in the affairs of humankind.

    Because Revelation 19-20 gives
    a true time-line for this, we
    see that "Day of the Lord" must
    exceed 1,000 years.

    So it does not surprise me when i
    find the "day the Lord comes" is
    seven years long.

    BTW there is also an 8-hour work day.
    There is a 24-hour day at one place
    on the earth. There is a 48-hour
    day (the length of a day at all points
    on the earth). I've not seen the
    48-hour day mentioned in any dictionary.
     
    #78 Ed Edwards, Mar 14, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 14, 2007
  19. EdSutton

    EdSutton New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    Webster defines polysyndeton as "using many conjunctions". As there are over 40 used in Matt. 24:1-35, I'd say that fits that bill, wouldn't you?

    Ed
     
  20. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    polysyndton


    dwmoeller1: //Like I keep saying: What does Scripture *SAY*.
    In this pasage it says that the transformation is a mystery,
    it does not say that the rapture (or its timing) is a mystery.//

    I appologize that God didn't choose to put in
    a verse built to your specifications.

    dwmoeller1: //So I ask again: What passage speaks
    of the rapture as being a mystery?//

    The two passages I took taken together.
    That English grammar which is largely based on Latin grammar, not greek. Syntax and grammar in the greek doesn't follow those rules. Don't apply English rules to greek. Now, refer me to source which says that this is unusual or 'incorrect' grammar in the greek and I will consider your reasoning more carefully.

    1. I wasn't trying to show 'incorrect' grammar.

    2. Tee hee. Look, look, look - The Latin follows the Greek Grammar:
    latin 'et' = English 'and'


    Matthew 24:3-44 (The Latin Vulgate )

    3 sedente autem eo super montem Oliveti accesserunt ad eum discipuli secreto dicentes dic nobis quando haec erunt et quod signum adventus tui et consummationis saeculi

    24:4
    et respondens Iesus dixit eis videte ne quis vos seducat

    24:5
    multi enim venient in nomine meo dicentes ego sum Christus et multos seducent

    24:6
    audituri autem estis proelia et opiniones proeliorum videte ne turbemini oportet enim haec fieri sed nondum est finis

    24:7
    consurget enim gens in gentem et regnum in regnum et erunt pestilentiae et fames et terraemotus per loca

    24:8
    haec autem omnia initia sunt dolorum

    24:9
    tunc tradent vos in tribulationem et occident vos et eritis odio omnibus gentibus propter nomen meum

    24:10
    et tunc scandalizabuntur multi et invicem tradent et odio habebunt invicem

    24:11
    et multi pseudoprophetae surgent et seducent multos

    24:12
    et quoniam abundabit iniquitas refrigescet caritas multorum

    24:13
    qui autem permanserit usque in finem hic salvus erit

    24:14
    et praedicabitur hoc evangelium regni in universo orbe in testimonium omnibus gentibus et tunc veniet consummatio

    24:15
    cum ergo videritis abominationem desolationis quae dicta est a Danihelo propheta stantem in loco sancto qui legit intellegat

    24:16
    tunc qui in Iudaea sunt fugiant ad montes

    24:17
    et qui in tecto non descendat tollere aliquid de domo sua

    24:18
    et qui in agro non revertatur tollere tunicam suam

    24:19
    vae autem praegnatibus et nutrientibus in illis diebus

    24:20
    orate autem ut non fiat fuga vestra hieme vel sabbato

    24:21
    erit enim tunc tribulatio magna qualis non fuit ab initio mundi usque modo neque fiet

    24:22
    et nisi breviati fuissent dies illi non fieret salva omnis caro sed propter electos breviabuntur dies illi

    24:23
    tunc si quis vobis dixerit ecce hic Christus aut illic nolite credere

    24:24
    surgent enim pseudochristi et pseudoprophetae et dabunt signa magna et prodigia ita ut in errorem inducantur si fieri potest etiam electi

    24:25
    ecce praedixi vobis

    24:26
    si ergo dixerint vobis ecce in deserto est nolite exire ecce in penetrabilibus nolite credere

    24:27
    sicut enim fulgur exit ab oriente et paret usque in occidente ita erit et adventus Filii hominis

    24:28
    ubicumque fuerit corpus illuc congregabuntur aquilae

    24:29
    statim autem post tribulationem dierum illorum sol obscurabitur et luna non dabit lumen suum et stellae cadent de caelo et virtutes caelorum commovebuntur

    24:30
    et tunc parebit signum Filii hominis in caelo et tunc plangent omnes tribus terrae et videbunt Filium hominis venientem in nubibus caeli cum virtute multa et maiestate

    24:31
    et
    mittet angelos suos cum tuba et voce magna et congregabunt electos eius a quattuor ventis a summis caelorum usque ad terminos eorum

    24:32
    ab arbore autem fici discite parabolam cum iam ramus eius tener fuerit et folia nata scitis quia prope est aestas

    24:33
    ita et vos cum videritis haec omnia scitote quia prope est in ianuis

    24:34
    amen dico vobis quia non praeteribit haec generatio donec omnia haec fiant

    24:35
    caelum et terra transibunt verba vero mea non praeteribunt

    24:36
    de die autem illa et hora nemo scit neque angeli caelorum nisi Pater solus

    24:37
    sicut autem in diebus Noe ita erit et adventus Filii hominis

    24:38
    sicut enim erant in diebus ante diluvium comedentes et bibentes nubentes et nuptum tradentes usque ad eum diem quo introivit in arcam Noe

    24:39
    et non cognoverunt donec venit diluvium et tulit omnes ita erit et adventus Filii hominis

    24:40
    tunc duo erunt in agro unus adsumetur et unus relinquetur

    24:41
    duae molentes in mola una adsumetur et una relinquetur

    24:42
    vigilate ergo quia nescitis qua hora Dominus vester venturus sit

    24:43
    illud autem scitote quoniam si sciret pater familias qua hora fur venturus esset vigilaret utique et non sineret perfodiri domum suam

    24:44
    ideoque et vos estote parati quia qua nescitis hora Filius hominis venturus est
     
Loading...