gigabyte71
Member
This is my first post here, just found the board recently and have been reading through this thread.
My response isn't really directed at the OP question, but rather the misunderstanding of what the 2nd is all about. I keep seeing all these responses about self defense, but that is no different than those that claim it is about hunting. The 2nd is about keeping the government at bay, not self defense or hunting.
The Framers of the Constitution did not initially include any bill of rights, which is why it is an amendment. If you read the writings on the debates around the Constitution, you would see that they really didn't think these rights would ever be questioned.
My response isn't really directed at the OP question, but rather the misunderstanding of what the 2nd is all about. I keep seeing all these responses about self defense, but that is no different than those that claim it is about hunting. The 2nd is about keeping the government at bay, not self defense or hunting.
The Framers of the Constitution did not initially include any bill of rights, which is why it is an amendment. If you read the writings on the debates around the Constitution, you would see that they really didn't think these rights would ever be questioned.