Please address post #73 and the verses Van claimed. I couldn't care less about Arminianism in this thread. Speak to scripture.I am being a bit dodgy, but I did have some hope you would post in those threads so I could answer you. Your statement says two things to me.
1. To the point you are arguing first. The scripture says,
“Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.” 4 Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due. 5 But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness,
What is the logical sequence given? God reveals Himself, which leads to Abraham trusts Him on faith, which leads to God credits Abraham as righteous. Why in this NT passage is there a lack of telling us faith was in fact God's work, not Abraham's? If the whole thing was God working in Abraham, why phrase it this way and not have God take credit immediately? Why tell us about predestination all the way in Romans 9-11 in a section about the true Israel, the children of Abraham? I just find this presentation confusing.
This goes to a broader problem I have with Calvinism, especially in regards to applying it to the OT. Where in the OT does the bible explain to us about eternal election, faith coming from God alone, and so many other points found in TULIP?
Meanwhile, there are texts that show God wants all saved found in the OT all the way through the NT. What of 1 Timothy 2:1-4? Let alone the Books of Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Lamentations?
That said, as I told Dave in another thread, I will say that Calvinism makes better sense of some verses than synergism. Ephesians 1-3, Romans 9-11, some other verses in the NT. That said, as I argued in my three biblical defenses of synergism, it fails to make sense of a whole host of verses. I will not call you 100% wrong, I will not call myself 100% right. That's obvious to me. My position has holes, and if even one scripture is at odds with a position of someone, then it is ultimately in error. I am in error, but I must warn you with sincerity, so are you. I have been for four years, asking, seeking, and knocking, perhaps not wholeheartedly with all my being. For, I am getting closer to understanding things but am not there yet and the Father has the wisdom I seek.
2. Arminianism is not a cult. I infer from your statement that you may even be saying that Christians who are not embracing TULIP may be false for doing so. Please correct me if I am wrong.
As to Abram...he had to believe first, which meant that before belief...God had to make Himself known to Abram before Abram could believe. In other words...God had to make Abram alive first.