Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Genesis 1:16 and God MADE the two great lights.Says no such thing. It is true though the Sun was one of two distinct lights on the fourth day.
Except if you don't believe the sun was created on day 4 you don't.For the record I take Genesis 1 to be literally true.
We identify the two lights as the Sun and Moon. It does not say God made the Sun and Moon on that day, rather, it says He made two lights on that day. Furthermore, the night and stars where already there, ". . . the lesser light to rule the night: the stars also." Now I logically deduce the Sun was the light of Earth's first day. Unless you suppose on the first day the light God let be was a temporary trifle until God got around to make the Sun on the fourth day.Genesis 1:16 and God MADE the two great lights.
Yes, it actually does say such a thing.
Now I logically deduce the Sun was the light of Earth's first day. Unless you suppose on the first day the light God let be was a temporary trifle until God got around to make the Sun on the fourth day.
My first study Bible has a note for "made" in v.16, " The word does not imply a creative act; vs.14-18 are declarative of function merely." In other words, the Sun and Moon are only said to be made lights, that is, became visible on the 6th day. The text here does not speak of their creation.I go with the temporary trifle. You're trying to fix something that really isn't a problem.
My first study Bible has a note for "made" in v.16, " The word does not imply a creative act; vs.14-18 are declarative of function merely." In other words, the Sun and Moon are only said to be made lights, that is, became visible on the 6th day. The text here does not speak of their creation.
Our local Milky Way Galaxy has been measured to be some 150,000 light years across. The Andromada Galaxy some 2.5 million light years away. And we see the stars from them now. Besides galaxies billions of light uears away. That makes the Heavens and the Earth (Genesis 1:1) older than when those 6 earth days of Genesis 1 took place. To say otherwise is irrational. And such thinking keeps others for even hearing the gospel. If that is what you wish to do.
SY, your OP is worded your way, but erroneously, and as such you should expect a little pushback. The Bible does not outright say, "The earth is [only] thousands of years old," rather you have to interpret it in order to create such a statement.This thread is about apparent age, though. That the universe seems old due to starlight distances but is only thousands of years old.
My first study Bible has a note for "made" in v.16, " The word does not imply a creative act; vs.14-18 are declarative of function merely." In other words, the Sun and Moon are only said to be made lights, that is, became visible on the 6th day. The text here does not speak of their creation.
Our local Milky Way Galaxy has been measured to be some 150,000 light years across. The Andromada Galaxy some 2.5 million light years away. And we see the stars from them now. Besides galaxies billions of light uears away. That makes the Heavens and the Earth (Genesis 1:1) older than when those 6 earth days of Genesis 1 took place. To say otherwise is irrational. And such thinking keeps others for even hearing the gospel. If that is what you wish to do.
This should not be treated as a salvation issue. I've not encountered OECs who treat it as such. In my experience, it's been certain YECs doing so. However, the deception perception can be a real deal breaker in accepting your interpretation. It doesn't mean you see it that way, though.Apparent Age is that yes if you go by nature vs the Word, the universe seems ancient. Starlight reaching earth alone makes nature seem ancient despite the clear teaching of scripture that the stars were made after the earth. The most common "critique" is that my God is a great deceiver. Those that hate my position tend to attack my faith and salvation next.
OK, then "the universe appears to be expanding" in a most finely-tuned manner. But in your haste to caricature "Big Bang" theory you indict the Bible, for the Bible also indicates that "at one time there was no universe." And this is where the problem lies—ignoring important points of agreement. The historical context is important, as you well know, and brings the Creator front and center.It's not a fact that the universe is expanding. But, it is a fact that according to current Big Bang theory, at one time there was no universe, and a small fraction of a second later, the visible portion alone of universe expanded to 85 billion light years across from something smaller than a part of a pea.
The Big Bang isn't the least needed to point out the universe has a beginning. Regardless of the origin of the universe, all the stars would eventually burn out as fuel is finite, therefor the age of the universe is finite. Further, the Big Bang doctrine is not convincing anyone that God exists for the reason that the universe must have had a beginning. What it is doing is convincing people that science has an explanation for the origin of the universe, therefor God isn't needed, which is sad because Big Bang theory is pure nonsense.
We identify the two lights as the Sun and Moon. It does not say God made the Sun and Moon on that day, rather, it says He made two lights on that day. Furthermore, the night and stars where already there, ". . . the lesser light to rule the night: the stars also." Now I logically deduce the Sun was the light of Earth's first day. Unless you suppose on the first day the light God let be was a temporary trifle until God got around to make the Sun on the fourth day.
SY, your OP is worded your way, but erroneously, and as such you should expect a little pushback. The Bible does not outright say, "The earth is [only] thousands of years old," rather you have to interpret it in order to create such a statement.
You should not be so surprised that you get reactions, as many people have very strongly held opinions regarding this. Perhaps you hold your own more loosely?
In any case, you might ought to ask yourself why you are so eager to attribute to the Bible a statement it does not make instead of stating that your own study has led you to your opinion.
My first study Bible has a note for "made" in v.16, " The word does not imply a creative act; vs.14-18 are declarative of function merely." In other words, the Sun and Moon are only said to be made lights, that is, became visible on the 6th day. The text here does not speak of their creation.
Our local Milky Way Galaxy has been measured to be some 150,000 light years across. The Andromada Galaxy some 2.5 million light years away. And we see the stars from them now. Besides galaxies billions of light uears away. That makes the Heavens and the Earth (Genesis 1:1) older than when those 6 earth days of Genesis 1 took place. To say otherwise is irrational. And such thinking keeps others for even hearing the gospel. If that is what you wish to do.
This thread is about apparent age, though. That the universe seems old due to starlight distances but is only thousands of years old.
God didn't allow us to discover these facts to deceive nor confuse us, but to EDUCATE us. And genesis 1 says God's spirit moved over the face of THE DEEP, which shows He was preparing to re-arrange an already-existing earth.
Makes God a liar. Not only an appearent past but a false history.This thread is about apparent age, though. That the universe seems old due to starlight distances but is only thousands of years old.
Makes God a liar. Not only an appearent past but a false history.
No it doesnt. Dumb argument