Dave G
Well-Known Member
Apologies for replying again to a thread that I had intended to stop replying to,
but @Reformed has made a point that I feel should be commented on:
But I do believe that God justified them by the blood of His Son, at the cross, no matter where "in time" they were born and came to repentance.
Abraham looked forward to Christ, and his faith in His Saviour is what evidenced God's justification of him from His sins.
The thief on the cross next to the Lord was shown as justified by that faith ( the evidence of his salvation ), even though the Lord was right in the middle of shedding His blood for Him.
Paul's justification and reconciling to God was effected on the cross even though Paul was called to repentance some months after.
My justification was the same, even though I had believed on Him roughly 1,978 years after His sacrifice for me.
Why is it that I base my observations on justification as I do?
Because I take these passages literally:
" For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life." ( Romans 5:10 ).
" And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in [your] mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled
22 in the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight:" ( Colossians 1:21-22 )
We, as believers, were reconciled in the body of His flesh through His death...not when we came to faith.
Faith is only the evidence of things that have happened ( or will happen depending upon which side of the cross the believer is at ), in a Saviour that has made them happen for all of us.
His elect were cleansed of their sins at the cross.
That is when the atonement was made, and that is when the shedding of blood for us happened.
I did not always understand it this way, but only recently came to it through my studies in His word.
I suppose we will have to agree to disagree, sir.
May God bless you greatly.
but @Reformed has made a point that I feel should be commented on:
I don't believe in eternal justification, either.I also do not believe in eternal justification, that God has justified His elect even before they came to faith in Christ.
But I do believe that God justified them by the blood of His Son, at the cross, no matter where "in time" they were born and came to repentance.
Abraham looked forward to Christ, and his faith in His Saviour is what evidenced God's justification of him from His sins.
The thief on the cross next to the Lord was shown as justified by that faith ( the evidence of his salvation ), even though the Lord was right in the middle of shedding His blood for Him.
Paul's justification and reconciling to God was effected on the cross even though Paul was called to repentance some months after.
My justification was the same, even though I had believed on Him roughly 1,978 years after His sacrifice for me.
Why is it that I base my observations on justification as I do?
Because I take these passages literally:
" For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life." ( Romans 5:10 ).
" And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in [your] mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled
22 in the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight:" ( Colossians 1:21-22 )
We, as believers, were reconciled in the body of His flesh through His death...not when we came to faith.
Faith is only the evidence of things that have happened ( or will happen depending upon which side of the cross the believer is at ), in a Saviour that has made them happen for all of us.
His elect were cleansed of their sins at the cross.
That is when the atonement was made, and that is when the shedding of blood for us happened.
I did not always understand it this way, but only recently came to it through my studies in His word.
I suppose we will have to agree to disagree, sir.
May God bless you greatly.
Last edited: