• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

wine

Status
Not open for further replies.

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
Linda64 said:
:thumbs: Amen! The word "wine" in the Bible is a generic word--it can mean the unfermented juice of the grape (fruit of the vine) or fermented juice of the grape--depending on the context. The word "wine" today ALWAYS means alcoholic/fermented--and in actuality it is considered the "strong drink" which is forbidden by God.

This wine in Proverbs 20:1:

Proverbs 20:1 Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging: and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise.

is NOT the same as this wine in Isaiah 65:8:

Isaiah 65:8 Thus saith the LORD, As the new wine is found in the cluster, and one saith, Destroy it not; for a blessing is in it: so will I do for my servants' sakes, that I may not destroy them all.
which wine is in Isaiah 25:6? The well aged grape juice is better than fresh? :laugh:
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
standingfirminChrist said:
Where wine is found in the Word of God, it is either the unfermented juice of the grape or other fruit, or it is the fermented beverage ... context shows which it is.

While I completely appreciate the point and the zeal, this is a perfect example of as difficult hermeneutical backflip as I've ever seen.

There is simply no support for this kind of a claim in either the original texts or backed up archeologically.

It's sort of like saying, Jesus' hair wasn't long and He didn't have a beard...and where it says it in the Scriptures it clearly means His hair just above the ears and He had a 5 o'clock shadow. Let's lay aside our presuppositions and not eisogete into the text what isn't there.

Jesus drank wine...and probably a good vintage. :)
 

readmore

New Member
I think I'm seeing a pattern here...

  • When the Bible mentions wine in a negative light, it means alcohol, and when it mentions wine in a positive light, it is grape juice.
  • We know this because the Bible says all alcohol use is forbidden.
  • We know alcohol use is forbidden, because the Bible speaks about it negatively, but when it speaks about it in a positive manner, it is referring to grape juice.
  • We know this because all alcohol use is forbidden.
  • And on and on...

There's a name for that kind of reasoning.
 

tjfkbrawny

New Member
standingfirminChrist said:
In Luke 7, Jesus only said He was eating and drinking. He did not say He was drinking alcoholic wine. As a matter of fact, He refuted the accusation that He was drinking alcohol by saying, "But wisdom is justified of all her children."

His Disciples were later accused of being drunk on "new wine" when they were not. The accusers knew the Disciples did not drink alcohol. That is why they falsely accused them.

Jesus ate and drank, but what He drank was not alcoholic. You are reading into the text that which is not there.

You have absolutely no proof that it was not alcoholic, either. The way you argue is "he said she said."
 

saturneptune

New Member
Since the Bible forbids wine you can always try this.

4.gif
 

mcdirector

Active Member
readmore said:
I think I'm seeing a pattern here...
  • When the Bible mentions wine in a negative light, it means alcohol, and when it mentions wine in a positive light, it is grape juice.
  • We know this because the Bible says all alcohol use is forbidden.
  • We know alcohol use is forbidden, because the Bible speaks about it negatively, but when it speaks about it in a positive manner, it is referring to grape juice.
  • We know this because all alcohol use is forbidden.
  • And on and on...
There's a name for that kind of reasoning.

This is the reason, at least in part, why some abstain from these threads now. I wonder how many are in the archives? Some are very heated.
 
preachinjesus said:
While I completely appreciate the point and the zeal, this is a perfect example of as difficult hermeneutical backflip as I've ever seen.

There is simply no support for this kind of a claim in either the original texts or backed up archeologically.

It's sort of like saying, Jesus' hair wasn't long and He didn't have a beard...and where it says it in the Scriptures it clearly means His hair just above the ears and He had a 5 o'clock shadow. Let's lay aside our presuppositions and not eisogete into the text what isn't there.

Jesus drank wine...and probably a good vintage. :)
It is not I who is eisogeting into the text what isn't there. You, and others are when you make such foolish statements that Jesus drank wine and probably a good vintage.

Nowhere in Scripture does it say the Lord Jesus Christ drank wine... nowhere!

The Pharisees accused Jesus of the very same thing you do now.
 

TCGreek

New Member
readmore said:
I think I'm seeing a pattern here...

  • When the Bible mentions wine in a negative light, it means alcohol, and when it mentions wine in a positive light, it is grape juice.
  • We know this because the Bible says all alcohol use is forbidden.
  • We know alcohol use is forbidden, because the Bible speaks about it negatively, but when it speaks about it in a positive manner, it is referring to grape juice.
  • We know this because all alcohol use is forbidden.
  • And on and on...

There's a name for that kind of reasoning.

:applause:
 

tinytim

<img src =/tim2.jpg>
I am still waiting on this answer...

Why does the Bible tell a deacon to not drink MUCH wine?
Is this wine considered Juice? or is it Alcoholic?

If it is Juice, then why the prohibition against Juice?
If it is Alcohol, then it makes much more sense.

So for those that want to make up the rules as you go, answer this!

Also, why was the Corinthians drunk at communion, if they were not using alcohol...

You all slithered out of the question about the Bible translating oinos as Juice, by changing the definition of "wine" to mean both juice and alcohol...

I dare you to stand in your churches this Sunday and tell them you had wine at breakfast this week... If you are convinced it can mean Juice.

Also, if it truly can mean juice, then why do you go to the trouble to say you do not serve wine but welchs at communion...

At the next communion, announce you will have bread and wine...
Let's see what happens...

Everyone knows wine means alcohol...
Except the few that want to slither the definition away.
 

tinytim

<img src =/tim2.jpg>
standingfirminChrist said:
It is not I who is eisogeting into the text what isn't there. You, and others are when you make such foolish statements that Jesus drank wine and probably a good vintage.

Nowhere in Scripture does it say the Lord Jesus Christ drank wine... nowhere!

The Pharisees accused Jesus of the very same thing you do now.

So are you saying we are fools for believing what the Bible says?
 
I have told my pastor of the wine I have made using ancient recipes recorded by historians of Bible times. He is anxious to try it out with communion the next time we have communion.

3 months since it was made and still no fermentation... nor will it ever ferment.
 
ccrobinson said:
So, the word wine in one place means one thing, but the same word means the exact opposite in a different place?

As my wife pointed out earlier, the wine that is a curse to man is not the same as the wine that is a blessing. One is alcoholic and the other isn't.
 

Joe

New Member
To the OP: Jesus a Partier :eek: How disheartening!

It's comforting to believe we are to completely abstain from alcohol except for medicinal uses. La la la la... It makes me happy :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ivon Denosovich

New Member
Joe said:
To the OP: Jesus a Partier :eek: How disheartening!

It's comforting to believe we are to completely abstain from alcohol except for medicinal uses. La la la la... It makes me happy :)
Interesting point. What about meds (besides alcohol) used for surgery? A person can't be said to 'be sober' when he's all doped up and waiting to be cut. To say that alcohol is always wrong would also condemn a patient not wanting to be cognizant when the knife work begins.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
standingfirminChrist said:
I have told my pastor of the wine I have made using ancient recipes recorded by historians of Bible times. He is anxious to try it out with communion the next time we have communion.

3 months since it was made and still no fermentation... nor will it ever ferment.
Have you sent it to a lab so they can test it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top