Featured KJVO and the Strongs Concordance

I can read a 1611 alongside my KJV and get the same thing.

i suppose some folks aren't into ancient English these days.

 

First, I don't use Strong's so no. Second, what does Copyright have to do with anything in the first place? Nothing. Third, you are brainwashed and not an objective thinker.

 

LOL then you either aren't reading an actual 1611, or just being dishonest.

 

The idiocy of this post is astounding. I was talking about manuscripts and instead of dealing with that you start talking about pro KJVO and Anti KJVO as if that had ANYTHING to do with what I was talking about.

Further, you said you google KJVO sources, yeah, that's objective. Good grief, go do some REAL study.

 

You fail to prove your opinion to be factually true.

Someone did make changes to the translators' work. A revision committee of twelve made changes to the work of the around 50 translators. Miles Smith and Bishop Thomas Bilson acted as editors and made some changes to the work of the translators. According to documented historical evidence in the 1600's, Church of England prelates whether Bishop Thomas Bilson, who was not a translator, or Archbishop Richard Bancroft or both made some changes to the translators' work. Later editors in 1629 and in 1638 at Cambridge also retranslated or changed some of the translation decisions in the 1611. Later editors in 1743, 1762, 1769 and other years retranslated or changed some of the translation decisions in the 1611 edition.

 

You repeat or invent a bogus, false allegation. You fail to prove what you claim to be true. You have been misinformed or deceived as you blindly believe claims that are not true.

 

You will NOT be getting the same thing between the 1611 and the 1769 edition!

 

Yes, the "pure" word of God existing today is the Lord Jesus!

 

Seems like extreme KJVO

 

Exactly! I am not anti-KJV. I don't even mind people who are KJV Preferred.

I do have issues with the uneducated position of KJVO PURE WORD etc... The people who usually hold to that have no idea what they are talking about with regard to any historical accuracy.

 

In which case I would send those people to

¶ And the brethren immediatly sent away Paul and Silas by night vnto Berea: who comming thither, went into the Synagogue of the Iewes.

11These were more noble then those in Thessalonica, in that they receiued the word with all readinesse of minde, and searched the Scriptures dayly, whether those things were so.

 

You could read a 1611 edition, but you may have your eyes closed to seeing the differences. The actual differences are there if your eyes are open to seeing them.

 

Copyright translations forbid about 50,000 words from their competitors to avoid infringement.

If you and I want to make our own modern "word of God", we must change the words to satisfy the copyright law.

Wanna try?

 

Folks say "here, read this" and post the 1611.

No problem.

 

How do you know they are posting the actual 1611?