Search results

...and make SCOTUS even more conservative if the chance arises. Republicans win control of the Senate; House remains up for grabs

He's a one term POTUS, a perfect opportunity to tackle such things as fixing SS and getting spending under control.

2016 Deja Vu?

My wife texted me Amish vote is keeping Trump in the race in Pennsylvania. Amish turn out for Pennsylvania vote in 'unprecedented numbers': source

I posted scripture, NOT Calvinist teaching, like it or not. ...hehe...surprise, surprise :) Nelson's ASV has the most relevant cross references for me, and I like their margin notes. I actually bought the 1909 Scofield notes PDF years ago, never did really dig into them, they're on my other...

Excellent.

I posted scripture, NOT Calvinist teaching. Are you able to clearly flesh that out from the context of Romans 9? I'd very much like to see it, if you're able. ,,,and I'm no fan of Scofield. I grew up in a hyper-Dispensational SB 'Scofield church'.

No Charlie, I'm going with scripture: 6 For while we were yet weak, in due season Christ died for the ungodly. 7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: for peradventure for the good man some one would even dare to die. 8 But God commendeth his own love toward us, in that, while we were...

21 And Jehovah God made for Adam and for his wife coats of skins, and clothed them. Gen 3 I agree with Pink and others that this is a wonderful type of Christ's imputed righteousness, brought about by the shedding of the animal's blood. Charlie, they ran and hid when Jehovah God was looking...

All who come to Him do so because God has already wrought within them [John 3:21]. The natural man, void of the Spirit, will never come to Him [1 Corinthians 2:14]. Romans 9 is not about proffering the gospel, it's about the purpose of God according to election, "not from the Jews only, but...

Bingo! The blood was shed to provide those skins.

It's your ignorance of scripture, Charlie. It's scripture, Charlie. 14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the likeness of Adam's transgression, who is a figure of him that was to come. 15 But not as the trespass, so also [is] the free...

Nope. I don't recall using 'their arguments' of late. I may quote Gill, or Pink. or even Edersheim whenever I like the way they've articulated something, but I've my own mind when it comes to scripture. Good grief, you're 'the commentary guy' here, not me. Again, there's no mention of...

...not interested in what Calvinists have done. Besides, there's no mention of them in the text. You say Romans 9 is applicable to 'Jews only' until the 24th verse. Did God not have a people among the nations during the Old Covenant? [John 10:16; Isaiah 54:1; Galatians 4:27]

@DaveXR650 Does it somehow lessen the severity of Ro 9, make it more palatable, by assigning the hard parts to Jews only?

Sounds a whole lot like Vanology.

...and, pretend this isn't there, smack dab in the middle of the context: 22 What if God, willing to show his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering vessels of wrath fitted unto destruction: 23 and that he might make known the riches of his glory upon vessels of...

Excellent.

1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called [to be] an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God, 7 To all that are in Rome, beloved of God, called [to be] saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. Ro 1 24 [even] us, whom he also called, not from the Jews...

HERE