Search results

Let's break this down..... Do you hold to the view that Pickering has reproduced the autographs? The answer helps me understand your view of f35. Which manuscript has the constant witness? But constant witness, I am assuming you are saying that is same the autograph witness. Did Pickering...

So there is no 100% agreement. Got it Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

That article is becoming quickly outdated. *"Text types" are now rejected in textual criticism. Only the Byzantine text type is recognized Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

You said 100% Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

"The constant witness being the text which all manuscript types agree at 100%." Where is the 100% agreement? All manuscript "types"? What is a type to you? Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Which manuscript of family 35 is the manuscript. None are the same. In fact, Pickering produce a f35 NT that doesnt match a single f35 manuscript Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Yes. The "it" is the example (Acts 15:7) I gave and was shown by Origen that it has indeed been corrected for the future update. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

The CSB is fixing it....as noted by Origen. All new Bibles produced will be correct. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

That should never be your answer when you charge a translation of going to far with gender. Your answer is basically, "I don't know". Let me help you out with the CSB he apostles and the elders gathered to consider this matter. After there had been much debate, Peter stood up and said to...

Blue Bloods is also really good. All episodes but the current season on CBS ate available on Hulu. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

This show is one of the best on TV. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

It makes them extremely uncomfortable to even entertain the idea that the English Bible can have a mistake. So if the KJV is set as the standard for what the Bible should say, everything else, even the Greek must be wrong. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

At times. It is still closer to the NA28 than it is to the Majority text or Byzantine text type, but it is closer to the Byzantine than the NA28. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

The biggest difference I have seen between the THGNT and the NA28, as far as readings go.... The THGNT went with the Byzantine reading for Luke 22:43-44, unlike the NA28 The are other times where the THGNT went with the Byzantine reading, but I can't recall specifics. The apparatus shows were...

There have made their production notes available. — Production notes Tyndale House

Yes....if the reading is found in the above it is in the apparatus and may or may not be included in the text. Other manuscripts support the readings...they are not the source of the reading in the text per se. So Rippon's question of 1739 is.... 1739 is not used to qualify the text as much as...

To answer your question more accurately. It does not look like 1739 is used. This image is from Jongkind's book on the THGNT Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

They will use latter manuscripts in the apparatus and to make textual decisions as long as the reading is found in atleast 1 early manuscript. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

The biggest is book order... which is annoying at first. I have noticed several punctuation difference and the the THGNT will not use anything not found in a Greek manuscript before 500 AD. (I believe. My book by Dirk Jongkind is at the church right now). When the punction is different than the...

I like it. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk