Search results

There is no Laodicean church age. That is Dispensationalism that twists scripture better than you do.

You are still twisting the original meaning.

You are using it to take liberties with scripture you should fear taking. “For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:” Revelation 22:18 (KJV 1900)

You are re-writing scripture. There is no such thing. They were 7 churches in the first century with churches today having similarities.

I'm not superstitious as far as KJV only. But I use it as my main study bible and quite a few others to help understand obscure passages.

I believe Dispensationalism places the Papal Antichrist, as identified by the Reformers, into Protestant Churches of our day. His control remains, only now through false doctrines originally created by the Jesuits to deceive Protestants into thinking the Antichrist is yet future. I think...

How many Antichrist doctrines do you hold to? You probably cannot identify them let alone see them. And you must think all of the Reformers were wrong?

The Catholic Church smears itself with its own pedophilia that goes all the way to the top. I don't read comic books, so I'm not familiar with Chick tracts.

Paul says we don't need to keep the Christian Holy Days. “One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth...

I mentioned it possibly as a reason to avoid fellowship with you. But you keep dredging it up. With respect, I responded to you even though you were taking the discussion off-topic.

Hopefully, you will understand my views of Antichrist still seated in the temple of God through His false teachings. One of which is Dispensationalism based on Jesuit lies meant to deceive Protestants. Even Clarence Larkin claims this. "In its present form it (Dispensationalism) may be said to...

Also, having Jesuit origins, Dispensationalism is a means by which Antichrist still remains embedded in the temple of God. You need to be aware of this. Also, many other Catholic doctrines replaced Christian truth today.

He kept the conversation going. I responded as a courtesy.

Insults only show a lack of thought.

How many times have you brought up Dispensationalism? Drop it and I will gladly not extend the courtesy of replying in good manners.

“Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.” Romans 5:9 (KJV 1900) Limited atonement justifies all for whom God intended. We are understood to be atoned for by Christ when we believe and live a holy life.

Thanks for noticing this. Notice I only respond to others as a courtesy if it seems to be drifting off-topic. Not all are Dispensationalists. You call yourselves "Baptists" and some are by historic standards. But in reply to John, I would no more attend a Dispensational "Baptist" church than I...

I don't fellowship with Dispensationalists any more than I would Mormons or any other cult.

Do you sit around reading comic books all day to be so well informed about them? Do you have any quotes from them to support your claims?

Dispensationalism is darkness. Man-made false prophecies. Inspired by Jesuits according to Clarance Larkin, the "yoda" of Dispies.