Search results

Yet another denial that the Doctrines of Disgrace are destructive heresies. But no response to the overwhelming evidence. 1) The lost seek God, thus total spiritual inability is a destructive heresy. 2) God chooses individuals for salvation through faith in the truth, thus individual...

I see Luke 11:10 has been trotted out as if the verse supported the idea that none ever seek God, because if they did, all would find Him. Again, utter biblical nonsense. Who decides if a prayer will be answered? The person persistently knocking, trying to talk with God, or God who decides...

Folks, this poster made a false claim about Greek grammar, then rather admitting error, changes the subject to my qualifications. Thus his character is confirmed. The present tense indicates an action that is in progress, such as the sun is "rising." It does not indicate the sun will continue...

In Colossians 1:3-5 we see that our hope of everlasting life with God is at least part of the basis for our faith in Christ and our love for God's chosen ones. And we came to have this hope, faith and love because we heard, and learned from the gospel of truth.

Why does it matter whether 5000 years BC or 4000 years BC is the date for the first human according to scripture? Adding another example of where numbers found in various early texts do not agree, only reinforces the belief that errors have been introduced in the transmission of the inspired...

I like to look at the CSB to compare various renderings of a verse under study. I prefer the NASB as my primary study bible, but I have a friend who thinks the CSB is best. The use of Yahweh rather than LORD, the NASB choice, does not bother me, but that change did bother many, hence the walk...

First, when continuity is meant, the perfect tense is used. Second, Luke 13:24 says many seek God and do not find him, such as those seeking God by works rather than faith. Romans 9. So your "undoubtedly" find Him is unbiblical nonsense. You seem to be advocating a rewrite of Romans 3:11...

These false teachers rewrite none seek God to none ever seek God and then claim those pointing out that is a rewrite are rewriting the verse. Yes I know they are pretending to be idiots but it bothers me that folks who claim to be Christians would be so deceitful. None seek after God could...

There is no reason to continue. I pointed out where I thought your OP was off the mark scripturally, and you do not see any reason to discuss the issues.

When I was a young person, the pulpit uniform was a dark suit and tie. Now, a goodly portion of preachers dress informally. But most avoid short pants, and open shirts. It is hard not to make accommodations with the cultural norms of your audience. Vulgar words are increasingly heard on TV...

I completely disagree that Christ did not come with the gospel of grace for all humanity. And then He said to them, “You foolish men and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken! “Was it not necessary for the Christ to suffer these things and to come into His glory?” Then...

All these naysayers have are false claims, rewriting scripture from none seek after God to none ever seek after God.

Genesis 1:1 does not say in my translation, from the beginning. And Ephesians 1:4 does not say from the beginning. So more diversion, more gibberish, more nonsense from the deceivers.

Yes, none seek God when sinning. Yes many seek the narrow door when they are not sinning.

I will consider your direct dealing when and if you want to discuss the issues. 1) Christ came with His gospel of grace for all humanity. 2) Christ did teach He would suffer and die to His disciples. See Luke 24:46-47

More diversion, more ignoring the issue, more deception.

So none seek God when sinning or all the time is what the verse means, and to claim it means Jesus is a liar is blasphemy. He said many seek the narrow door... This is all they have folks, denial and diversion.

Repeating gibberish is a standard ploy of deceivers. They deny Galatians Chapter 3 where God says Gentiles belong to the house of Israel as they become children of the promise with Abraham becoming their father. And for the second post, they ignore Luke 26:46-47.

Here are the fallacies shot down by 2 Thessalonians 2:13. 1) Unconditional Election of individuals for Salvation. 2) From the beginning is only used to refer to the creation week. 3) People are not chosen for salvation before creation, but during their physical lifetime, after they have...

Matthew Chapter 15 Why do you post and not address Luke 24:46-47? I have already informed you that the house of Israel includes believing Gentiles. And that Christ first presented His gospel to the Jews, but then also to the Gentiles. Your fiction is unbiblical nonsense.