Search results

Essentially...but with the Caveat that I do not believe in "Original Guilt".

Truth is....."Primitive" Baptists are the only logically consistent Calvinists on Earth. As an Arminian...I respect the intellectual honety and logical consistency of "Primitive" Baptists to no end... I disagree that Calvinism necessitates a refusal to engage in World-Wide Evangelism (it's...

Calvinist Modus Operandi: (as revealed succinctly in this thread) Step 1.) State one's OWN position Step 2.) Caricaturize it/ Create from whole-cloth a "straw-man" of your own position, and blame the opposition for it...even though it was, in fact, YOU who submitted it!!!! Step 3.) Cry like...

Good for you for caricatur-izing Calvinism.....You just caricaturized Calvinism....NO Non-Calvinist Did.....YOU DID.. You will proceed to argue that non-Calvinists have argued this weird caricature that YOU submitted, and your Calvinist Brethren will ally with you 100% and they'll even get...

Not so....and I shall explain my beloved freind Benjamin's mistake here forth-with

This is studied confusion....The earth doesn't appear "old"......it appears like it was once catastrophically destroyed by a massive and violent FLOOD....as the Scriptures already clearly state for us in Genesis... And then....lest we STILL don't get it....re-itterates itself in: 2Pe 3:5...

Let's read Scripture: God created the LIGHT on Day one..day uno...day un....day einz... God created the STARS on Day four...day quatro...day quatre....day veir....let's do it in "Belarusian" just for fun: day Чатыры Day 1: Light Day 4: Star How is this so hard to understand?

Adam was created "MATURE"...no doubt...he wasn't an infant. This is what I buy: But the appearance of "age" means Adam was plausibly created with something like: "an appearance of having somehow endured a signifigant amount of successive events properly understood as moments of calculable...

True...so what?

You are abusing II Thess. 3:2: It does NOT say what you think it says: Here are other translations to clarify what the KJV says (no this doesn't mean the KJV is wrong...it's right...you just aren't reading it correctly. Re-read your KJV in light of this) ESV - 2Th 3:2 - and that we may be...

No...that is non sequitor.

You appear to have much to learn...I know how much you will balk at hearing this...but YES..we ABSOLUTELY have the right to "question"...and that is pure Scripture. Look again.

Absolutely!!!! Having experienced the death of a beloved saved family member...I am pretty sure you will find that my prayers will largely be for YOU and your family at least as much as for him..... If he is a child of God now as you say..than his death is TRULY a blessing! For him, and your...

Let's look at the Bible really quick....IT'S SUPERLY-DUPERLY complicated folks (I promise) :rolleyes: So pay attention: Let's begin at Book #1 and Chapter #1: Gen 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. So...light happened but let's keep going Gen 1:5 And God...

Some did...Plenty of them did. An honest look at History with a discerning eye would make this plain. Some VERY early Theologians believed in a Pre-Trib rapture. This doesn't prove pre-trib to be correct of course...but this thread seems to have been started by someone who ONLY wants to...

According to the article Winman Posted....the term "supersessionism" is also appropriate if you take offense to the term "replacement" Theology, and it apparently takes two general forms: (my verbiage used in the definitions here) 1.) "punitive": The idea being that the Church "replaced"...