Search results

Regarding the OP...once again..God=God, and there is nothing posed which is debated by anyone. Icon is correct that an Omnipotent deity=an Omnipotent deity....there is simply no debate here.

This is insane.....Lemme explain reality to you 1.) Bronconagurski is an intelligent and informative Bible-believing Calvinist who does not agree with "HoS" on many Soteriological issues. 2.) That being said: Bronconagurski is a poster who often gives intelligent and reasoned responses to...

John the Baptist's Preaching...and that of Christ's were not "either/or"...John came to preach the message to repent....So did Christ. Jesus also said "Except ye repent you shall all likewise perish." I was unaware of the fact that somehow the preaching of John the Baptist and Jesus Christ...

JoJ.... Your fixation on Confucius as a true "mono-theist" may be reaching somewhat. I am decidedly not prepared to "Debate" you (in a point/counter-point kind of way) on the topic as I have read little of him. But, as an amateur Historian....I don't know too many people who would classify...

Everyone agrees with you on this. Nothing you have stated in your OP is debated or Scripturally debateable. God "Reigns" over ALL....always has, always will. :wavey:

John.... I appreciate your responses on this thread...but there is a confusion here. You are correct that you are using the term "Philosophy" differently than others here are. You are speaking past Ht and Ben, and myself and others and vice versa.

What difference would it make for you personally? All the difference in the World...My reaction would be anger and defiance. A volitional being who is not even possibly a party to grace would be like Lucifer and all his fallen angels...Now at enmity with God (actually, that would assume that...

WOW!!! Willis (may I call you that)??? Wonderful votes of confidence you have shown in my rejoinders...I thank you for your kind words about my posts... Now, if only I learn to interract with our fellow Christians with the more Christ-like Spirit of yours (Which I envy).....I might be of...

I admit...I simply don't understand the Op sir......Would you please explain it to us??? I don't understand it. You obviously are confident that you do...So will you explaiin what it means??? My "skull" as you state, is too impenatrably hard to understand it....but others...including lurkers...

There's the "Time-travel" accusation which Van denies that he makes...We merey await Van's reitteration of the "Crystal-ball" accusation which he also denies that he makes.... One down...One more to go...Just wait until he gets so angry that he accuses Skan of "Crystal-ball" Paganism...It'll...

Well, he failed to use the assumed definite particle "the" when he described God as: But who is counting...:rolleyes:

OH....this is too juicy to ignore...Please tell us O.R.....what specific "idea" he has "thought up" which denies the God of the Bible... Dear God....don't respond H.T....................Please...Just let him talk. Let Old Regular please tell us, what Humble thinker has yet said which has...

[ Agreed, actually...and not for the same reasons you would agree to it, but, yes, I agree. You aren't thinking sir....You just denied by this statement that you yourself exist.....(as you phrased it anyway) and thus, by extension, this conversation never occured. "Vain": a term I will...