Search results

Briefly? I posted one small paragraph. You posted 7 lengthy responses. That is why I didn't respond in the first place. If you take issue, and I know you do, then be more concise or go more slowly. How do you expect anyone to respond to all that you have written? The RCC cannot take any credit...

Very willing to try. In fact on many things one can agree to disagree. However IT just responded: "The error" that is directly mentioned in this thread is part of the Baptist Faith and Message of the SBC. It is very similar to what I believe. And yet for that belief it has elicited such...

In reading through this thread I believe the OP, as stated, has an agenda. IT has twice referred to it. In post #58 he said: It is where I stand and make a stance. I believe you would too, especially if you agree with John MacArthurs stance. Implied here is all that disagree with MacArthur...

Please be careful not to post links to other Catholic sites that promote the Catholic faith. It is against the rules here. As Darrell mentioned he is here to debate you. The administration, however, will look at it as either propagating or even proselytizing for the RCC. The Catechism is fine...

To bait and kill rats on a farm a cup of grain mixed with just a little bit of arsenic will kill them. The RCC has a whole lot of arsenic in it and only some truth. It is difficult to defend error as truth. Much of that will come later perhaps. I think I made my point that the Pope made the...

The Catechism specifically says: Thus the current pope has gone against his own teaching. http://www.kofc.org/un/en/catechism/index.html#

This is your assertion: Meanwhile, the Catholic Church holds fast to the truths of Christ, but it is false. It is false because the Bible is silent on this subject and doesn't speak for or against contraception. It would only speak against that form of contraception which would lead to abortion...

Perhaps. I made one or two posts and then you answered with a full page of posts which I didn't want to take the time or energy to go through. If you are going to devote so much time to one point then take one point at a time. For example, concerning birth control or contraception, it seems...

I have been willing to let this go a long time ago. Yes, I said I was a literalist, and took the statement literally, not recognizing the sarcasm. I regret that my post has offended you (IT). I trust we can move on.

Truth? Are you sure about that? Here we are on page 16, past post #320. But this all started when you responded to a post by SG which he posted sometime after 10:00 pm MDT yesterday. Your response was less than two hours after mid-night, on page 11, over 100 posts ago, and you are still whining...

True. That is what I believe the Millennium will be like. Right now it is under a curse. That curse will be lifted. That is how the lion will lie down with the lamb. The harmony of nature will be restored. Man will live much longer. In order to do so the atmosphere will have to be changed. The...

I agree with that.

Then it wouldn't be a "millennium" by very definition of the word, would it? :)

He will sit on David's throne for a thousand years. After that will be the Great White Throne Judgment. Shortly after that, as far as I understand Scripture, this earth will be destroyed and an new earth and a new heaven will be created. His Kingdom, even in a new earth will be forever and...

Who has the rights to one that has given himself over to Satan (i.e., a Satanist), God or the devil? That answer should be obvious. You must be born again.

Yes, I am a literalist. So the question is: When I read those chapters, I ask myself the question, what did John really see when he was transported to heaven? What was he trying to describe. I will give you an example. Quite a few years ago I was on the mission field for a lengthy period of...

Have you ever considered that to be an atheist, the a-theist first must admit "theism" that is, the existence of God. To be an a-millennialist, one must first admit there is a Millennium. Funny thing about that. You do agree then that by very definition, there is a one thousand year reign. You...

That was one of the reasons, the famed atheist, Madeline O'hare attacked the Bible and tried to get it banned from public schools--because of such asinine reasoning like yours. She did use that argument.

Not me, at least not from Revelation 20. It doesn't teach that.

He created all things. He doesn't "own" all things. Look in Job. He allowed Job to have "control" over Job's life, and today he has given Satan control over this world. That is control, not ownership.