Search results

I was only stating that most scholars and some Futurists commentaries Say Daniel 11:31 (sorry wrong verse) is about Antiochus, Exactly how Martin stated it. But i do I believe there was multiple fulfillments of this as well. One with Antiochus and one in AD 70 (the 70 weeks) So I don't...

Daniel 11:34 And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that makes desolate. Most scholar's and even futurist commentaries place this at Antiochus. You don't even know how...

It's the same verse. How can YOU not understand that! He only had one discourse. Luke just explained it because his gospel went to more to gentile nations. The AOD is Jerusalem surrounded by armies. It's a parallel verse. Did Jesus speak two different discourses? Or did they just word it each...

Thats adding a lot to that chapter to make it fit. A third temple, that is spoken no where in the bible. Not one verse. Its only "implied" you can say. A prophecy about the destruction of the second temple being somehow about the end of the world. Because the apostles asked 3 questions They...

You can't even answer simple questions that I asked about the cloud comings in the OT. You are just stuck on repeat.

They are all parallel passages, meaning the same thing. Luke explained what these passages mean... Armies surrounding Jerusalem. I don't think a world wide armageddon is going to matter If we flee to the mountains or not.

I highly doubt 1.1 million jews were aware of it and let it happen.

He was just repeating Joels, prophecy It was future tense in the prophecy.

I don't know about that. Ask the 1.1 million jews that died.

Someone else can restart it if they want. I dont have to. Then we can go from there.

Exactly the way I see it, "Sun not giving Light Moon to blood", only describes major events. Judgment, and the Major event of Pentecost. Just like there is Multiple "Day of the "Lords"

Im simply asking robycop3 to explain what he believes happened in the OT verses. Im not giving a position on what I think here.

I am sorry as well that you don't understand the question presented before you. You keep repeating your only knowledge of the subject. Im not a complete preterist yet ;) My view of revelation and "the man of sin" Is debateable. "cometa" pass? They already happened. They were prophecies...

That is not a written view. Sorry. Please answer my other post. about The explanation of the OT verses.

Finally someone giving an opinion and answering something instead of questioning my motive. How Robycop3 just anwser the question and not jump to conclusions about why i'm asking.

No actually i'm not. Stop making assumptions about my motives. My question was a simple, how do you explain these passages. That is all. Im curious on how you explain them.

I dont see how that is relevant to that question I asked Robycop3. Im not questioning my own view on this matter.

People did have time to flee, just like it says, but who fled? The people of the Church in Jerusalem were commanded by an oracle given by revelation before the war to those in the city who were worthy of it to depart and dwell in one of the cities of Perea which they called Pella. To it those...

So the moon turning to blood in appearance has never happened before? Im not trying to be silly, Im trying to figure out what your key to literalism is. So how do you explain this? Im asking seriously How? Ezekiel 32:7-8 7 And when I shall put thee out, I will cover the heaven, and make...

Thats exactly what I want to know :Biggrin