The thing about accusers is they are often hypocrites. So yes they probably drink and got drunk. The accusation about eating wasn't the eating part but whom he ate with. The accusation was that Jesus hung out with bad people and must therefore by association be bad. So the implication by their accusation was that Jesus by drinking wine and eating with sinners was a drunkard and a sinner himself. That's where his accusers wanted to go with the accusation. So by implication its clear Jesus drank wine as well as hang out with sinners. However, what they failed to reason was just because Jesus partook in wine and spent time with sinners didn't make him a drunkard or a sinner.
There you go! Amen!