• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Nine Tenets of Fundamentalism

Status
Not open for further replies.

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
Your understanding of the end time really is!
Jesus didn't mention a millennium in the gospels. Neither did any of the others. He uses 1000 years as a symbol for the saints reigning over Satan, binding him. The 1000 years are not the kingdom. Satan attacks the kingdom when loosed.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
When the believers are raised from the dead (Revelation 20:4-6; John 6:40), just at the time of the rapture (1 Thessalonians 4:15-16-17).
And then ushers in His kingdom for 1000 years upon this earth!
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jesus said his kingdom is spiritual. There is no physical kingdom.


"Spiritual" can include the physical when a possession of the Lord
mortal men can be spiritual

Galatians 6:1 Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
"Spiritual" can include the physical when a possession of the Lord
mortal men can be spiritual

Galatians 6:1 Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.
Following are a few passages that we need to consider before developing views on Revelation 20.

Please consider the spiritual nature of the Kingdom:

“And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” (Matthew 3:2) (KJV 1900)


“And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.” (Matthew 11:12) (KJV 1900)


“Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.” (Matthew 16:28) (KJV 1900)


“Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” (John 3:3) (KJV 1900)


“Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.” (John 18:36) (KJV 1900)


“And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:” (Luke 17:20) (KJV 1900)


“Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.” (Luke 17:21) (KJV 1900)


“But if I cast out demons by the finger of God, then the kingdom of God has already overtaken you.” (Luke 11:20)


“because we are not looking at what can be seen but at what cannot be seen. For what can be seen is temporary, but what cannot be seen is eternal.” (2 Corinthians 4:18)


“Now when the people saw the miraculous sign that Jesus performed, they began to say to one another, “This is certainly the Prophet who is to come into the world.”Then Jesus, because he knew they were going to come and seize him by force to make him king, withdrew again up the mountainside alone.” (John 6:14–15)
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jesus didn't mention a millennium in the gospels. Neither did any of the others. He uses 1000 years as a symbol for the saints reigning over Satan, binding him. The 1000 years are not the kingdom. Satan attacks the kingdom when loosed.
John mentioned it!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As a symbol depicting Satan's binding by the saints. Otherwise, you contradict all that Jesus said about the kingdom.
You have to include what all of the Apostle said aboute the Kingdom, as they looked for Him to set it up at His returning!
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As a symbol depicting Satan's binding by the saints. Otherwise, you contradict all that Jesus said about the kingdom.
As a symbol - Thus folks make the scripture say whatever they want it to say by faulty discernment and thereby misapplying symbols.
So we will just have to wait and see what actually happens.

Probably won't care by then :)
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As a symbol - Thus folks make the scripture say whatever they want it to say by faulty discernment and thereby misapplying symbols.
So we will just have to wait and see what actually happens.

Probably won't care by then :)
Interesting that the scenerio in Revelation is though that jesus has already returned before satan is Bound, so he woul dhve to be into preterism to claim it as he does!
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
As a symbol - Thus folks make the scripture say whatever they want it to say by faulty discernment and thereby misapplying symbols.
So we will just have to wait and see what actually happens.

Probably won't care by then :)
Do you expect to see any green horses or red dragons floating in outer space anytime soon?
 

atpollard

Well-Known Member
esus didn't mention a millennium in the gospels. Neither did any of the others. He uses 1000 years as a symbol for the saints reigning over Satan, binding him. The 1000 years are not the kingdom. Satan attacks the kingdom when loosed.
So when does that symbolic 1000 years of the saints binding satan and rendering him powerless until released start? Looking at the History Books and the News, I don't see it having started yet.

Your interpretation does not align with reality.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Do you expect to see any green horses or red dragons floating in outer space anytime soon?
No. Please note I said "misapplying" symbols. many dispensational books correctly apply the the meanings of symbols and metaphors in the Book of Revelation, I believe you know that Dave.

In any case - What then is your own explanation (you don't need to answer) i.e. the 4 horsemen of the Apocalypse. I understand completely what the symbolism is and have a hermeneutic to explain them. I also believe there were 7 real not symbolic churches in Asia Minor to which the Revelation was sent.

However These 7 churches are also representative of churches in the 21st century e.g. The church of Laodicea representing lukewarm (wishy-washy) churches.

In Revelation 20 there is "the 1000 years" which I believe is literal.

So in the final analysis I repeat as I have for many years here at the BB. Our eschatological differences are explained by the different assignments (or not) that we give to what is considered "symbolic".

Having said that - I have no real problem of fellowship with you Dave and I respect your symbolic view of the millennium of Revelation 20 completely.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So when does that symbolic 1000 years of the saints binding satan and rendering him powerless until released start? Looking at the History Books and the News, I don't see it having started yet.

Your interpretation does not align with reality.
It would have to be after the second coming, as per the scxriptures!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No. Please note I said "misapplying" symbols. many dispensational books correctly apply the the meanings of symbols and metaphors in the Book of Revelation, I believe you know that Dave.

In any case - What then is your own explanation (you don't need to answer) i.e. the 4 horsemen of the Apocalypse. I understand completely what the symbolism is and have a hermeneutic to explain them. I also believe there were 7 real not symbolic churches in Asia Minor to which the Revelation was sent.

However These 7 churches are also representative of churches in the 21st century e.g. The church of Laodicea representing lukewarm (wishy-washy) churches.

In Revelation 20 there is "the 1000 years" which I believe is literal.

So in the final analysis I repeat as I have for many years here at the BB. Our eschatological differences are explained by the different assignments (or not) that we give to what is considered "symbolic".

Having said that - I have no real problem of fellowship with you Dave and I respect your symbolic view of the millennium of Revelation 20 completely.
Jesus first coming as fulfilling prophecies all in a physical sense, why would not His second Coming and end time events?
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Just to cover my own position - I do believe there will be a literal 1000 year kingdom reign of Christ.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Just to cover my own position - I do believe there will be a literal 1000 year kingdom reign of Christ.
I just cannot see how an all spiritual millinium would fulfill the OT prophecies of the King ruling here on the earth!
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
No. Please note I said "misapplying" symbols. many dispensational books correctly apply the the meanings of symbols and metaphors in the Book of Revelation, I believe you know that Dave.

In any case - What then is your own explanation (you don't need to answer) i.e. the 4 horsemen of the Apocalypse. I understand completely what the symbolism is and have a hermeneutic to explain them. I also believe there were 7 real not symbolic churches in Asia Minor to which the Revelation was sent.

However These 7 churches are also representative of churches in the 21st century e.g. The church of Laodicea representing lukewarm (wishy-washy) churches.

In Revelation 20 there is "the 1000 years" which I believe is literal.

So in the final analysis I repeat as I have for many years here at the BB. Our eschatological differences are explained by the different assignments (or not) that we give to what is considered "symbolic".

Having said that - I have no real problem of fellowship with you Dave and I respect your symbolic view of the millennium of Revelation 20 completely.
If we do not make Revelation conform to the clear teachings of Jesus about the kingdom, it becomes nothing more than a giant Rorschach test for ever prophecy buff stuffing their armchairs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top