Amazingyes I have readit, and all Chrsitians should, and no, People were saved way before He was even born!
I was not able to read it completely. Would fall asleep, very small print, etc...
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Amazingyes I have readit, and all Chrsitians should, and no, People were saved way before He was even born!
Jesus didn't mention a millennium in the gospels. Neither did any of the others. He uses 1000 years as a symbol for the saints reigning over Satan, binding him. The 1000 years are not the kingdom. Satan attacks the kingdom when loosed.Your understanding of the end time really is!
And then ushers in His kingdom for 1000 years upon this earth!When the believers are raised from the dead (Revelation 20:4-6; John 6:40), just at the time of the rapture (1 Thessalonians 4:15-16-17).
I have read it in my Logos software, so madse the text size bigger, and waded thru it over aperiod of time!Amazing
I was not able to read it completely. Would fall asleep, very small print, etc...
Jesus said his kingdom is spiritual. There is no physical kingdom.
Following are a few passages that we need to consider before developing views on Revelation 20."Spiritual" can include the physical when a possession of the Lord
mortal men can be spiritual
Galatians 6:1 Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.
John mentioned it!Jesus didn't mention a millennium in the gospels. Neither did any of the others. He uses 1000 years as a symbol for the saints reigning over Satan, binding him. The 1000 years are not the kingdom. Satan attacks the kingdom when loosed.
As a symbol depicting Satan's binding by the saints. Otherwise, you contradict all that Jesus said about the kingdom.John mentioned it!
You have to include what all of the Apostle said aboute the Kingdom, as they looked for Him to set it up at His returning!As a symbol depicting Satan's binding by the saints. Otherwise, you contradict all that Jesus said about the kingdom.
As a symbol - Thus folks make the scripture say whatever they want it to say by faulty discernment and thereby misapplying symbols.As a symbol depicting Satan's binding by the saints. Otherwise, you contradict all that Jesus said about the kingdom.
Interesting that the scenerio in Revelation is though that jesus has already returned before satan is Bound, so he woul dhve to be into preterism to claim it as he does!As a symbol - Thus folks make the scripture say whatever they want it to say by faulty discernment and thereby misapplying symbols.
So we will just have to wait and see what actually happens.
Probably won't care by then
Do you expect to see any green horses or red dragons floating in outer space anytime soon?As a symbol - Thus folks make the scripture say whatever they want it to say by faulty discernment and thereby misapplying symbols.
So we will just have to wait and see what actually happens.
Probably won't care by then
Paul didn't mention a physical millennium.You have to include what all of the Apostle said aboute the Kingdom, as they looked for Him to set it up at His returning!
So when does that symbolic 1000 years of the saints binding satan and rendering him powerless until released start? Looking at the History Books and the News, I don't see it having started yet.esus didn't mention a millennium in the gospels. Neither did any of the others. He uses 1000 years as a symbol for the saints reigning over Satan, binding him. The 1000 years are not the kingdom. Satan attacks the kingdom when loosed.
No. Please note I said "misapplying" symbols. many dispensational books correctly apply the the meanings of symbols and metaphors in the Book of Revelation, I believe you know that Dave.Do you expect to see any green horses or red dragons floating in outer space anytime soon?
It would have to be after the second coming, as per the scxriptures!So when does that symbolic 1000 years of the saints binding satan and rendering him powerless until released start? Looking at the History Books and the News, I don't see it having started yet.
Your interpretation does not align with reality.
Jesus first coming as fulfilling prophecies all in a physical sense, why would not His second Coming and end time events?No. Please note I said "misapplying" symbols. many dispensational books correctly apply the the meanings of symbols and metaphors in the Book of Revelation, I believe you know that Dave.
In any case - What then is your own explanation (you don't need to answer) i.e. the 4 horsemen of the Apocalypse. I understand completely what the symbolism is and have a hermeneutic to explain them. I also believe there were 7 real not symbolic churches in Asia Minor to which the Revelation was sent.
However These 7 churches are also representative of churches in the 21st century e.g. The church of Laodicea representing lukewarm (wishy-washy) churches.
In Revelation 20 there is "the 1000 years" which I believe is literal.
So in the final analysis I repeat as I have for many years here at the BB. Our eschatological differences are explained by the different assignments (or not) that we give to what is considered "symbolic".
Having said that - I have no real problem of fellowship with you Dave and I respect your symbolic view of the millennium of Revelation 20 completely.
I just cannot see how an all spiritual millinium would fulfill the OT prophecies of the King ruling here on the earth!Just to cover my own position - I do believe there will be a literal 1000 year kingdom reign of Christ.
If we do not make Revelation conform to the clear teachings of Jesus about the kingdom, it becomes nothing more than a giant Rorschach test for ever prophecy buff stuffing their armchairs.No. Please note I said "misapplying" symbols. many dispensational books correctly apply the the meanings of symbols and metaphors in the Book of Revelation, I believe you know that Dave.
In any case - What then is your own explanation (you don't need to answer) i.e. the 4 horsemen of the Apocalypse. I understand completely what the symbolism is and have a hermeneutic to explain them. I also believe there were 7 real not symbolic churches in Asia Minor to which the Revelation was sent.
However These 7 churches are also representative of churches in the 21st century e.g. The church of Laodicea representing lukewarm (wishy-washy) churches.
In Revelation 20 there is "the 1000 years" which I believe is literal.
So in the final analysis I repeat as I have for many years here at the BB. Our eschatological differences are explained by the different assignments (or not) that we give to what is considered "symbolic".
Having said that - I have no real problem of fellowship with you Dave and I respect your symbolic view of the millennium of Revelation 20 completely.