In this case I would like to prolong the issue a little more.
Apostolic succession implies a succession going back to the original 12 apostles.
OR
An authoritative body to confer the gift.
OR
Someone claiming and able to prove they are an apostle.
May I see you list of predecessors if the first above? OR
Who is the authority for conferring it OR
What evidence is there forthcoming if someone claims they are an apostle?
If I may...
Your comment for defining an apostle said "sent one."
That is one of the definitions for an apostle. Very simply it means "sent one."
Here is the word in usage elsewhere:
Mark 6:27 (KJV)
27 And immediately the king
sent [apostolos] an executioner, and commanded his head to be brought: and he went and beheaded him in the prison,
There is nothing spiritual about the word.
An apostle can be you if the Lord were to speak audibly to you and send you on some mission.
But then are you a true apostle if you can't raise the dead, or the other RESTRICTED teachings in Scripture that are relied on to identify a true apostle?
Still, you have been sent but can't raise the dead as is commonly nd erroneously held in the Church today?
Would you be an apostle without the Scriptural identifying "marks" assigned to an apostle by others?