At the foundation of your belief is the "mind is immaterial" argument. If the premise is flawed the argument will be flawed. You continually accuse everyone of rejecting the Word while you are espousing the ancient Greek philosophy of DUALISM advanced by Aristotle, Plato and Descartes. You have accused others of embracing the DSM-IV while you embrace Principia Philosophiæ. I don't get it.
I am not getting the complaint here: Are you suggesting that some form of mind/body substance Dualism is an unsound viewpoint? With respect, the inestimable Rene' Descartes was quite within reason to embrace Dualism, at least on some level as Substance Dualism is the philosophy most consistent with a Religious World-view....I think if you look into it most
Modern Christian Philosophers are substance Dualists in some way or another....(nothing "ancient" about it, except that the patently obvious has been understood for millennia). The alternative is a Materialistic View not particularly consistent with Theology.
If there is no validity to Dualism then Romans 12:2
King James Version (KJV)
2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the
renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
Would read something to the effect of:
Be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by
the miraculous rearrangement of various particles of brain matter, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable and perfect, will of God.