Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I am not sure what you are trying to get at. What are you trying to prove?
If there is a sin for which one cannot be forgiven, then Christ did not die for their sins, because if He did, that sin would be included. Moreover, people are not condemned for any sin that they do, but because they have never believed on Christ.
Also, if faith is obedience, why is it distinguished from works in James 2? The faith in John 3:16 cannot be the faith in James 2, if faith is obedience. Why does it say faith without works is dead, if faith does not mean to simply believe?
Some of the reformers misinterpreted the Bible and their writings are not dependable for doctrine.
Original thread.
I get a kick out of some of these threads. Don't you realize that you came at this with a preconceived theology of your own? You started a thread that began with the premise that the "unforgivable sin" has to be simple unbelief - all the while ignoring clear scriptures that indicate it to be something far more. You tried to dovetail that into your theology of a universal atonement, "Jesus left no sin unpaid when he died for all people's sins". And now you have judged the reformers and apparently they have come up short. This from a guy who has another current thread where you changed your theology. I keep forgetting that we do live in the age of self-esteem.
I already disbelieved the reformers then got confused.
Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is not the same as simple unbelief. And "the reformers" takes in a huge range of people, some of which were not Calvinists. You can even find articles asking if Calvin was a Calvinist. A large part of theology involves people trying to take the teachings of scripture and fit them into a "system" of belief that they can grasp. It won't be perfect. I agree that the reformers were flawed, sometimes deeply, but I tell you, you will miss out on some of the best writing on things pertaining to God and living a Christian life if you dismiss them out of hand.
Well, for a long time I'd been afraid I committed the unpardonable sin somehow so I don't want to believe that kind of theology.
See. This is what I mean. So you reject a whole system of theology - when theologians from that very system from old times to modern times could have helped you greatly. Would it help if I told you that John Owen, the Puritan, Tom Schreiner, a modern reformed theologian, and Calvin himself all say or said that your being afraid that you committed the unpardonable sin was the best indication that you have NOT done so? Yet your answer is to reject a whole system.
And what is that supposed to mean?
The sheep and goats, wheat and tares are the final states. Tares don't turn to wheat and the goats don't turn into sheep.The Bible says that Christ came to die for His sheep, not the goats.
I did that because I couldn't find scriptural evidence of that.
No; they've been in the 'torments' area of HADES. They won't be in gehenna (hell) til after the Great White Throne judgment.Essau, Haman, and Cain
have been in Hell a long time.
Notice that all those were sinners and the bible says they were saved because they believed the gospel message.
Well, in the video there, Schreiner uses scripture constantly. The article in an earlier post from Calvin's Institutes uses scripture constantly. Puritan writings never go more than 2 sentences without presenting scripture. I find it strange, the theme that runs through this forum that some of the non Calvinists take. Namely; that Calvinist's rely on theology instead of scripture. What I have found in reality is that there is very little written at all by non Calvinists. That is because there are hardly any non Calvinist theologians and hardly any non Calvinists in the pews who want to talk about such things. The reason I lean toward Calvinism (I am not totally convinced of all aspects of it), is that all of the good literature that has helped me for real in my actual Christian life, has been written by Calvinists. I don't think there are many exceptions except for Richard Baxter and Wesley and Thomas Kempis.
Ken you have got to get out of theological box that you are in.
You just keep proving your lack of comprehension skills.
The sheep and goats, wheat and tares are the final states.
Do you believe that we have to persevere in good works to be saved?