Brother Bob
New Member
Attacks don't accomplish anything we have already proved that. peace :thumbs:I could keep going around and around with you but you are clearly showing either denial or total ignorance.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Attacks don't accomplish anything we have already proved that. peace :thumbs:I could keep going around and around with you but you are clearly showing either denial or total ignorance.
BB. If God is all knowing (and He is) Psalms139...one of many... Then He knows the future as it exists or the alternative is that He is not all knowing. If He knows the future as it exists, then man will always choose in a manner that will be in line with what God already knows. In other words... we do not make a choice in a vaccuum... all our choices are affected by other factors. God is the one, or He puts the other factors in our lives in HIs providence, to cause us to choose in a manner that is consistent with His decreed will. Please read Psalms 139. I've followed these debates and if you will check... I don't post that much. I choose to control my tongue as much as possibleI learn more that way. Grace and peace to you.
Attacks don't accomplish anything we have already proved that. peace
Where did I do that? I have used Scriptures all the way and the misunderstanding is not on my part. peace:Fish:Attacks do not accomplish anything, you are right, but explaining the plain meaning of scripture hasn't accomplished any thing either as you keep denying it says what it says.
Because He knows does not mean He chose. We all believe in a all knowing God but that is entirely a different subject, and is different than a God who chose some for Heaven and the rest for hell before the world began. peace
It was a response to this view...reformedbeliever said:Webdog. I'm a 5 point calvinist, and I absolutely do not believe God is bound by time. All creation is bound by time. He is the creator and not created... and is absolutely not bound by time. He created time for His creation.
If this were true then God would be like a man tied to the railroad tracks with a train coming. Knowing full well what was going to happen, but powerless to change.
He doesn't "see" eternity past and future...He's the "I AM".(He sees eternity past and eternity future right now)
It doesn't prove that at all. Being omnitemporal is not the same as declaring everything.that proves that our destiny is set by God.
Not only His declarative will, but His permissive will. Sovereigny in not negated if God allows things to happen (permissive will). If you negate His permissive will, you then have just reinforced double predestination, and He also becomes the author of sin.all our choices will be consistent with God's decreed will. He is sovereign
This is a human paradox, but would God be bound by this limitation? I don't think He would. If God wanted someone to go back into time, and kill their grandfather, God would use even this for His glory, including altering the future so that the person who killed the grandfather would still exist. Deep stuff, huh? :laugh:Philosophers would say that if man had the capability to travel in time, lets say back in time, that a man would not be able to go back and kill his grandfather... either by accident or on purpose. To do so would mean that the man would have never existed to go back in time. This is called the grandfather paradox.
skypair said:If you guys want a quick "down and dirty"
The OT saints weren't "regenerated" ("born again," indwelt by the Holy Ghost) and yet they were saved. Nicodemus in John 3 is the proof -- "Can a man enter into the womb again?" He, a "Master of Iserael," had no clue what Jesus was talking about. Yet "regeneration" is the key to the "elect's" hearing the [Lazarus-like]"call" of salvation! How does Calvin answer that?
The fact is, he didn't. His entire system might have worked IF it was only the new covenant church that was being saved. But through ignorance of the other covenants of God, he missed the point that OT Israel would be resurrected postrib to the "new birth" that Nicodemus couldn't comprehend. Put simply, the OT saints only got part of the "predestination package" in their first life.
Guys, Israel's inheritance is the earth forever, even in the New Earth -- the church's is in New Jerusalem in heaven. Israel has parts of their "predestination package" still ahead of them -- resurrection, regeneration, indewelling Spirit of sanctification, spiritual gifts, body of "terrestrial glory," rapture (Rev 20:11), body of "celestail glory," New Earth.
Instead of believing Calvin's flawed paradigm, I invite you to receive the Bible's!
skypair
Jesus told Nicodemus only that he needed to be born again. The rest YOU added. The Bible tells us that faith comes by HEARING and hearing by the WORD of God!Jesus was not telling Nicodemus, an Old Testament saint, that he must be born again because only the Spirit, not the gospel, not preaching, can regenerate a soul dead in sin and trespasses.
I have to comment on this, too. You hold the Holy Spirit above Christ. Jesus said I AM the resurrection and the Life! He didn't say the Holy Spirit is the resurrection and the life, and then I take action. The Word is ENOUGH to raise the dead (physical and spiritual) to life. The Spirit and the Word work in unison, not separate!because only the Spirit, not the gospel, not preaching, can regenerate a soul dead in sin and trespasses.