• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Where does God's Wrath Go?

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
It includes jews and gentiles as vessels of wrath, just like it includes jews and gentiles as vessels of mercy who are called Rom 9:22-24

20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?

21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:

23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,

24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?
Yep. That is my point (Gentiles are children of the promise as well).

That is a great answer for those who question our faith by asking why God would create those who end up in Hell.

But yes, God has the right over the clay. Even those who do not believe are used for His purposes and ultimately as a demonstration of His glory. And yes, God chose those based on the Promise rather than the flesh. And yes, this was to His glory.

The only time I have seen Christians and "Christians" get into problems with this passage is when they try to read into it rather than read it.

Anyway, I have no issue with the passage or what you have posted of it as well. That was not what I was talking about. My point is no passage describes men who are lost as being elect in terms of salvation.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But the wrath of God must be propitiated, must have someone take it in order to have it able to have God the Father able to freely forgive, as being Holy, cannot just pat sinners on the head and tell them "good boys, I now forgive you"
This is correct. God's wrath is His righteous anger, and it is satisfied by the propitiation wrought by the Lord Jesus Christ on the cross. God's love is shown by the fact that is was He who set Christ forth as a propitiation by His blood so that He might be just and the justifier of the one who believes in Jesus (Romans 3:25-26).
 

Paleouss

Active Member
Site Supporter
But the law of sin and death existed even where the Law did not. Those from Adam to Moses sinned. They died. "Sin begats death", "the wages of sin is death".

Where I disagree is saying that the law of sin and death is like the Law. There is nothing to transgress witg the law of sin and death. The wages of sin is death.
Greetings JonC. Grace and hope to you through our Lord Jesus Christ.

I would first like to say that I am not commenting on "where does wrath go" or commenting based on the others in this thread. Since wrath is tied to the law I am focusing on what you said in the quote above regarding the law.

My observations are these (looking for what you think or how you consider it).

1. Sin is lawlessness (1John 3:4). This means that sin is without law or there is no law or order concerning sin. Under the uncheck dominion of sin, there was no law and order, if you will, which is shown in 1John 3:4 (which you affirmed in another thread).

2. Paul alludes to a law of sin and death (Rom 7:23, 25, 8:2) that he contrasts against the law of the Spirit of life in Christ.


My observation is this... if sin is lawlessness how can there be a law of sin? This seems to be a contradiction. If sin is lawlessness then framing sin under a structure of law seems like an error. But what if Paul knows full well that this would be a contradiction and intends his phrase to mean something slightly different than the isolated dominion of power of sin that was found from Adam until Moses.

What if Paul intends to present the law of sin and death as a post Law of Moses. In this since the law of sin and death means, sin + God's law = law of sin and death.

We see that Paul shows this concept in 1 Corinthians 15:56 when he says, "The sting of death [is] sin, and the strength of sin [is] the law." Here Paul frames sin and the law together, working together in a way that brings death. In other words, a law that gives strength to sin and death... or another possible way ... a law of sin and death.

One last observation, In Romans 7 Paul talks about how sin "taking the opportunity by the commandment, produced in me all manner of evil desire" (Rom 7:8). Here Paul again combines the two. In this case, Paul tells us that "desire" was generated by sin that worked through the law.

Is this what Paul means when he says the "law of sin and death"? Which does he mean...

1. Sin + lawlessness dominion = law of sin and death
2. Sin + law = law of sin and death

Keep seeking God's truth (Prov 2)
 

Ben1445

Well-Known Member
@JonC
Without getting too deep into the details, if there is nothing to the idea that Jesus took the wrath of God for us, why did Jesus suffer the way He did?
Couldn’t He have just given His life for ours? Why all of the suffering?
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
I disagree. But I guess people see hints based on what they already believe.

For example, when I read those verses I do not see a hint that Jesus absorbed Gid's wratg but that He was made like us, but without sin. The Law works wrath, but I do not see Jesus as suffering under the Law (I see Jesus as fulfilling the Law, thereby canceling that certificate of debt against those under the Law). I see Jesus suffering under the bondage of sin and death because of our sin.

But where you end usually depends on where you start, so that can color what we see as "hints" or "implied".
Jesus became our own atonement seat, as he was willing to take upon Himself the earned and due wrath and condemantion we should hvae received, that is Pauline justification 101
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
I do not see that. First, the Law brings wrath in that it highlights human sin (kinda like a school teacher). But the curse here is different. It shows that Jesus came under sin and death (our curse). The Law taught this as well (Jesus was hung on a tree).

We have to remember that there is a difference between sin and transgression the Law. Every transgression is a sin, but not all sins are transgressions. Sin was in the world even when the Law was not.
God the father has active wrath to be directed against all sinners in judgement , not a merely passive one
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
No, not reasoning out but definitely interpreting differently.

I do not believe Jesus becoming a curse for us is a curse under the Law but under sin. The reason is Jesus did not come to redeem people from the Law but from sin and death. I believe Paul makes this clear in Romans 5.

I am not arguing against you. I took it as you offering your interpretation which, perhaps mistakenly, I saw as an invitation for me to offer mine as well.
he was able to be our Atoning sacrifice by bearing our deserved wrath and judgment in our place
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
@JonC
Without getting too deep into the details, if there is nothing to the idea that Jesus took the wrath of God for us, why did Jesus suffer the way He did?
Couldn’t He have just given His life for ours? Why all of the suffering?
He was forced to experince for first and only time in his eternal existence beign seperated from the father as all lost sinners will experience
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
This is correct. God's wrath is His righteous anger, and it is satisfied by the propitiation wrought by the Lord Jesus Christ on the cross. God's love is shown by the fact that is was He who set Christ forth as a propitiation by His blood so that He might be just and the justifier of the one who believes in Jesus (Romans 3:25-26).
That great truth of Pauline Justification is what causes Rome and others to deny that truth, as we are at same time unholy sinners and yet clothed with righteousness of Christ himself, so sinner and saint both before Holy God
 

Brightfame52

Well-Known Member
Yep. That is my point (Gentiles are children of the promise as well).
Thats right, jew and gentile are of the vessels of wrath and the vessels of mercy. The point is, you cant transfer from one group to the other, we had that destiny predetermined by God which group we are in.
That was not what I was talking about. My point is no passage describes men who are lost as being elect in terms of salvation.

Well the elect from a spiritual and practical perspective are born lost, that's why Jesus came to save His People from their sins Matt 1:21 this is about the elect.

The elect are described as lost i believe here Lk 19:10

10 For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Thats right, jew and gentile are of the vessels of wrath and the vessels of mercy. The point is, you cant transfer from one group to the other, we had that destiny predetermined by God which group we are in.


Well the elect from a spiritual and practical perspective are born lost, that's why Jesus came to save His People from their sins Matt 1:21 this is about the elect.

The elect are described as lost i believe here Lk 19:10

10 For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.
????

I am not trying to transform one group to another.

I am saying that the Bible does not speak of the elect except they already believe (that "Christ is in them).

I was merely pointing out that fact. I was not transforming groups.

Predestination is not to salvation (biblically, anyway). Christians are "predestined to be conformed to the image of Christ." Christians are "saved to do good works that God prepared before hand that they would do them".

Yes,I know Jesus cane to seek and save the lost. Those who are saved were once list, enemies of God.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Frankley I dont understand what you saying, nor do I believe you understand what you saying friend.
I believe that you do not understand what I am saying. Thus far, you have been the only one on this thread, but we all understand differently. I can assure you that I understand exactly what I have said. It is really not difficult at all. I can tell you facts, but I cannot understand them for you.

So it doesn't get lost in the junk, for the other members on this forum (and those who may pass by), what we are talking about (what @Brightfame52 does not understand) is this statement I made:

Scripture does not speak of the lost as "elect". Instead Scripture speaks of those who believe as the elect.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
The elect are described as lost i believe here Lk 19:10

10 For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.
9 And Jesus said to him, “Today salvation has come to this house, because he, too, is a son of Abraham. 10 For the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost.”

No. This verse speaks of the salvation of Zaccheus. Jesus came to save the lost.

But yes, those who are "numbered among the elect" were once numbered among the lost.

2 Corinthians 13 and 2 Peter 1 equate "elect" and "numbered among the elect" with belief in Christ.

2 Corinthians 13 tells us that if we do not believe we are not the elect.

That pretty much sums it up.
 

Brightfame52

Well-Known Member
I believe that you do not understand what I am saying. Thus far, you have been the only one on this thread, but we all understand differently. I can assure you that I understand exactly what I have said. It is really not difficult at all. I can tell you facts, but I cannot understand them for you.

So it doesn't get lost in the junk, for the other members on this forum (and those who may pass by), what we are talking about (what @Brightfame52 does not understand) is this statement I made:

Scripture does not speak of the lost as "elect". Instead Scripture speaks of those who believe as the elect.
You just confirmed what I stated.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Yes that describes the elect in a spiritual lost condition by nature
Elsewhere as well.
Ephesians 2:1-3.

You both have misunderstood what is being discussed.

We all agree that we were once dead in our trespasses, unbelievers, enemies of God, lost, and in need of Spiritual life. What we have been talking about is the fact that nowhere in the Bible are the elect referred to as "dead in their trespasses", lost, unbelievers, etc.

And you were dead in your offenses and sins, in which you previously walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, of the spirit that is now working in the sons of disobedience. Among them we too all previously lived in the lusts of our flesh, indulging the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, just as the rest.

There are no passages in the Bible that speaks of the elect as being lost.

@Martin Marprelate 's post misses the issue completely, just as your did.


But yes, we are Chriatians so we all agree that we were once dead in our trespasses. We all agree that Jesus came to save the lost. As Christians we also all believe the passages in 2 Cor and 2 Peter, that equate election with belief and being "numbered among the elect" with spiritual life as well.
 
Top